10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Therapeutic Alliance and Rapport Modulate Responses to Psilocybin Assisted Therapy for Depression

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Across psychotherapeutic frameworks, the strength of the therapeutic alliance has been found to correlate with treatment outcomes; however, its role has never been formally assessed in a trial of psychedelic-assisted therapy. We aimed to investigate the relationships between therapeutic alliance and rapport, the quality of the acute psychedelic experience and treatment outcomes.

          Methods: This 2-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial compared escitalopram with psychedelic-assisted therapy for moderate-severe depressive disorder ( N = 59). This analysis focused on the psilocybin condition ( n = 30), who received two oral doses of 25 mg psilocybin, 3-weeks apart, with psychological preparation, in-session support, and integration therapy. A new psychedelic therapy model, called “Accept-Connect-Embody” (ACE), was developed in this trial. The primary outcome was depression severity 6 weeks post treatment (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, QIDS-SR-16). Path analyses tested the hypothesis that therapeutic alliance (Scale To Assess the Therapeutic Relationship Patient Version, STAR-P) would predict depression outcomes via its influence on the acute psychedelic experience, specifically emotional-breakthrough (EBI) and mystical-type experiences (MEQ). The same analysis was performed on the escitalopram arm to test specificity.

          Results: The strength of therapeutic alliance predicted pre-session rapport, greater emotional-breakthrough and mystical-type experience (maximum EBI and MEQ scores across the two psilocybin sessions) and final QIDS scores ( β = −0.22, R 2 = 0.42 for EBI Max; β = −0.19, R 2 = 0.32 for MEQ Max). Exploratory path models revealed that final depression outcomes were more strongly affected by emotional breakthrough during the first, and mystical experience during the second session. Emotional breakthrough, but not mystical experience, during the first session had a positive effect on therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session ( β = 0.79, p < 0.0001). Therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session had a direct impact on final depression scores, not mediated by the acute experience, with a weaker alliance ahead of the second psilocybin session predicting higher absolute depression scores at endpoint ( β = −0.49, p < 0.001)

          Discussion: Future research could consider therapist training and characteristics; specific participant factors, e.g., attachment style or interpersonal trauma, which may underlie the quality of the therapeutic relationship, the psychedelic experience and clinical outcomes; and consider how therapeutic approaches might adapt in cases of weaker therapeutic alliance.

          Clinical Trial Registration: This trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT03429075).

          Related collections

          Most cited references118

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Multivariate Data Analysis

            For over 30 years, this text has provided students with the information they need to understand and apply multivariate data analysis. This text provides an applications-oriented introduction to multivariate analysis for the non-statistician. By reducing heavy statistical research into fundamental concepts, the text explains to students how to understand and make use of the results of specific statistical techniques. In this revision, the organization of the chapters has been greatly simplified. New chapters have been added on structural equations modeling, and all sections have been updated to reflect advances in technology, capability, and mathematical techniques. :Pearson New International Edition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression.

              The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), a new measure of depressive symptom severity derived from the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS), is available in both self-report (QIDS-SR(16)) and clinician-rated (QIDS-C(16)) formats. This report evaluates and compares the psychometric properties of the QIDS-SR(16) in relation to the IDS-SR(30) and the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(24)) in 596 adult outpatients treated for chronic nonpsychotic, major depressive disorder. Internal consistency was high for the QIDS-SR(16) (Cronbach's alpha =.86), the IDS-SR(30) (Cronbach's alpha =.92), and the HAM-D(24) (Cronbach's alpha =.88). QIDS-SR(16) total scores were highly correlated with IDS-SR(30) (.96) and HAM-D(24) (.86) total scores. Item-total correlations revealed that several similar items were highly correlated with both QIDS-SR(16) and IDS-SR(30) total scores. Roughly 1.3 times the QIDS-SR(16) total score is predictive of the HAM-D(17) (17-item version of the HAM-D) total score. The QIDS-SR(16) was as sensitive to symptom change as the IDS-SR(30) and HAM-D(24), indicating high concurrent validity for all three scales. The QIDS-SR(16) has highly acceptable psychometric properties, which supports the usefulness of this brief rating of depressive symptom severity in both clinical and research settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                31 March 2022
                2021
                : 12
                : 788155
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Brain Sciences, Centre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine , London, United Kingdom
                [2] 2 Medical Psychotherapy, South West London and St. Georges NHS Trust , London, United Kingdom
                [3] 3 Department of Psychology, Ryerson University , Toronto, ON, Canada
                [4] 4 Medical Psychotherapy and General Adult Psychiatry, Devon Partnership NHS Trust , Exeter, United Kingdom
                [5] 5 Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University , Surrey, United Kingdom
                [6] 6 Psychedelics Division Neuroscape, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Katrin H. Preller, University of Zurich, Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Chris Stauffer, VA Portland Health Care System, United States

                Monnica T. Williams, University of Ottawa, Canada

                *Correspondence: Roberta Murphy, roberta.ni.mhurchu@ 123456gmail.com
                [ † ]

                These authors share last authorship

                This article was submitted to Neuropharmacology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                788155
                10.3389/fphar.2021.788155
                9009076
                35431912
                3138a79a-4804-487d-971d-dfa544e79808
                Copyright © 2022 Murphy, Kettner, Zeifman, Giribaldi, Kartner, Martell, Read, Murphy-Beiner, Baker-Jones, Nutt, Erritzoe, Watts and Carhart-Harris.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 October 2021
                : 07 December 2021
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                psilocybin,therapeutic alliance,therapeutic relationship,emotional breakthrough,mystical experience,depression,acute psychedelic experience,psychedelic assisted therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article