6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Youth Use of e-Cigarette Flavor and Device Combinations and Brands Before vs After FDA Enforcement

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , , , PhD 2 , , MSc 2 , , MPH 1 , , PhD 1
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Did e-cigarette use among youth change following the prioritized enforcement efforts from the US Center for Tobacco Products against nontobacco, nonmenthol (ie, sweet)–flavored cartridge e-cigarettes in February 2020?

          Findings

          This US nationally representative cohort study found no difference in e-cigarette continuation rates between youth who used sweet/cartridge e-cigarettes and youth who used other flavor/device combinations. More than 75% of youth who initiated or continued e-cigarette use in 2021 used flavor/device combinations and brands not included in the enforcement priorities of the US Center for Tobacco Products.

          Meaning

          The results of this cohort study suggest that among youth, targeted e-cigarette enforcement was not associated with significant change in flavored e-cigarette use.

          Abstract

          Importance

          The US Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) prioritized its enforcement efforts against nontobacco, nonmenthol (ie, sweet)–flavored cartridge e-cigarettes in February 2020. Within-person e-cigarette initiation, continuation, and switching behaviors among youth are unknown following CTP’s prioritized enforcement efforts.

          Objective

          To describe transitions in youths’ e-cigarette flavor/device combination use, brand use, nicotine use, and frequency of use following CTP’s e-cigarette enforcement prioritization.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          The US population-based, nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health cohort study included data collected in 2019 and 2021 from youth aged 12 to 17 years. The data were analyzed from February to June 2023.

          Exposure

          e-cigarette use (past 30 days), flavor/device combination used, brand used, nicotine use, and frequency of use.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Transitions in e-cigarette use, flavor/device combination used, brand used, nicotine use, and frequency of use between 2019 and 2021 among 9088 youth aged 12 to 17 years in 2019; prevalence of e-cigarette use, flavor/device combination used, and brand used in 2019 (n = 8771) and 2021 (n = 5574) among youth aged 14 to 17 years in each year.

          Results

          The 2019 sample included 8771 youth. The population of those aged 12 to 17 years was 49.0% female (95% CI, 48.7%-49.3%) and 51.0% male (95% CI, 50.8%-51.3%). Participants were 15.4% Black (95% CI, 15.0%-15.7%), 24.1% Hispanic (95% CI, 23.9%-24.4%), 75.9% non-Hispanic (95% CI, 75.6%-76.1%), 69.1% White (95% CI, 68.5%-69.8%), and 15.5% another race (95% CI, 14.9%-16.1%). Among youth ages 12 to 17 years who did not use e-cigarettes in 2019, 531 (6.5%) initiated use in 2021 (95% CI, 5.9%-7.1%); among them, 415 (76.8%) initiated with a combination other than a sweet cartridge (95% CI, 72.2%-80.8%). Among youth ages 12 to 17 who used e-cigarettes in 2019, 360 (47.8%) continued use in 2021 (95% CI, 44.0%-51.1%). Continuation rates were similar for those who used sweet-cartridge e-cigarettes (144 [51.5%]; 95% CI, 45.7%-57.3%) and those who used other combinations (204 [47.6%]; 95% CI, 42.8%-52.4%) in 2019. Among those who continued e-cigarette use in 2021, 121 (84.0%) of those who used sweet-cartridge e-cigarettes in 2019 switched to a different combination (95% CI, 77.0%-89.2%). Overall, among youth who used e-cigarettes in 2021, 177 (53%) used a sweet-disposable combination, 32 (11%) used a sweet-cartridge, and no individual brand was used by more than 10%.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          The results of this longitudinal cohort study of youth in the US suggest that most youth who initiated or continued e-cigarette use in 2021 used flavor/device combinations that were excluded from CTP’s enforcement priorities. Restrictions and enforcement efforts that only cover a subset of products may be ineffective at preventing youth flavored e-cigarette use.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines transitions in youth e-cigarette flavor/device combination use, brand use, nicotine use, and frequency of use following e-cigarette enforcement prioritization by the US Food and Drug Administration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          e-Cigarette Use Among Youth in the United States, 2019

          The prevalence of e-cigarette use among US youth increased from 2011 to 2018. Continued monitoring of the prevalence of e-cigarette and other tobacco product use among youth is important to inform public health policy, planning, and regulatory efforts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Tobacco-Product Use by Adults and Youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014.

            Noncigarette tobacco products are evolving rapidly, with increasing popularity in the United States.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

              This paper describes the methods and conceptual framework for Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study data collection. The National Institutes of Health, through the National Institute on Drug Abuse, is partnering with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products to conduct the PATH Study under a contract with Westat.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                14 August 2023
                August 2023
                14 August 2023
                : 6
                : 8
                : e2328805
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
                [2 ]School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 5, 2023.
                Published: August 14, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28805
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Kasza KA et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Karin A. Kasza, PhD, Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton St, Buffalo, NY 14263 ( karin.kasza@ 123456roswellpark.org ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Kasza had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Kasza, Hyland.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Kasza, Hammond, Rivard.
                Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kasza, Hammond, Reid, Hyland.
                Statistical analysis: Kasza, Hammond, Rivard.
                Obtained funding: Kasza, Hyland.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Kasza, Hammond, Hyland.
                Supervision: Kasza, Hyland.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kasza reported grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Hammond reported personal fees from being an expert witness in legal challenges on behalf of public health authorities and nonprofit government agencies outside the submitted work. Dr Hyland reported grants from National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: This manuscript was funded by NIDA/NIH and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products under award number R21DA053614.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the US Food and Drug Administration.
                Data Sharing Statement: See the Supplement.
                Article
                zoi230829
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28805
                10425823
                37578794
                2f7b0343-4129-4f42-8bf9-b989fa4b934c
                Copyright 2023 Kasza KA et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 26 April 2023
                : 5 July 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Public Health

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content292

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors190