13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Post-Traumatic Growth and Stress-Related Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a National Representative Sample: The Role of Positive Core Beliefs About the World and Others

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Given the need to understand both the negative and positive psychological consequences of the current global COVID-19 pandemic (Brewin et al. in Perspectives in Public Health 10.1177/1757913920957365 2020), the aim of this study was to test a cognitive model of post-traumatic symptoms (PTS) and post-traumatic growth (PTG) during confinement caused by the SARS-COV-2 epidemic. In line with cognitive models of trauma elaboration (Park in Psychological Bulletin 10.1037/a0018301), we included in our model some beliefs associated to the world (e.g., primal beliefs about a good world), to the self (e.g., death anxiety or orientation toward the future) and to others (e.g., suspiciousness or identification with humanity). To evaluate the explanatory model, a national representative sample of adults between the ages of 18 and 75 (N = 1951) was surveyed between 7th and 13th April, 2020, in the middle of a strict 7-week national confinement. Structural equation modelling yielded a very similar model to the one initially specified. The results highlight the role of both negative and positive core beliefs, which are pertinent to the current pandemic threat, in the appearance of PTS and PTG, respectively. In short, primal beliefs about a good world, openness to the future and identification with humanity were associated with PTG; while suspiciousness, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety about death and also identification with humanity were associated with PTS and consequent impairment. This is an innovative study of different pathways to traumatic responses and growth during a pandemic. Future research is needed to replicate its findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

          Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on public mental health. Therefore, monitoring and oversight of the population mental health during crises such as a panedmic is an immediate priority. The aim of this study is to analyze the existing research works and findings in relation to the prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method In this systematic review and meta-analysis, articles that have focused on stress and anxiety prevalence among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic were searched in the Science Direct, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (ISI) and Google Scholar databases, without a lower time limit and until May 2020. In order to perform a meta-analysis of the collected studies, the random effects model was used, and the heterogeneity of studies was investigated using the I2 index. Moreover. data analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Results The prevalence of stress in 5 studies with a total sample size of 9074 is obtained as 29.6% (95% confidence limit: 24.3–35.4), the prevalence of anxiety in 17 studies with a sample size of 63,439 as 31.9% (95% confidence interval: 27.5–36.7), and the prevalence of depression in 14 studies with a sample size of 44,531 people as 33.7% (95% confidence interval: 27.5–40.6). Conclusion COVID-19 not only causes physical health concerns but also results in a number of psychological disorders. The spread of the new coronavirus can impact the mental health of people in different communities. Thus, it is essential to preserve the mental health of individuals and to develop psychological interventions that can improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              The Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 and Physical Distancing: The Need for Prevention and Early Intervention

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cvazquez@ucm.es
                Journal
                J Happiness Stud
                J Happiness Stud
                Journal of Happiness Studies
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                1389-4978
                1573-7780
                11 January 2021
                : 1-21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4795.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 7667, Department of Personality, Assessment and Clinical Psychology, , Complutense University of Madrid, ; Madrid, Spain
                [2 ]GRID grid.441783.d, ISNI 0000 0004 0487 9411, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Comunicaciones, , Universidad Santo Tomás, ; Santiago, Chile
                [3 ]GRID grid.5380.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2298 9663, Universidad de Concepción, ; Concepción, Chile
                [4 ]GRID grid.11835.3e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, School of Psychology, , University of Sheffield, ; Sheffield, England
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1796-2161
                Article
                352
                10.1007/s10902-020-00352-3
                7798377
                33456320
                2f531d75-5fbd-4407-b73d-cd193c1ee5c1
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 20 December 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100014440, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades;
                Award ID: PSI2016-74987-P
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002911, Universidad Complutense de Madrid;
                Award ID: GR29/20
                Award ID: CT42/18
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007136, Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación;
                Award ID: BES-2017082015
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004587, Instituto de Salud Carlos III;
                Award ID: COV20/00737
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council (UK)
                Award ID: ES/V004379/1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Paper

                post-traumatic growth,post-traumatic stress symptoms,trust,optimism,covid-19

                Comments

                Comment on this article