1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contemporary trends in management of uveal melanoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          In the management of uveal melanoma, eye plaque brachytherapy (EPBT) has replaced enucleation as the standard of care for small size tumors that require treatment, and for medium size tumors. In the modern era, EPBT is being utilized more frequently for certain large tumors as well. While there is prospective randomized evidence to support utilization of EPBT for tumors of appropriate dimensions, it is unclear what the actual practice patterns are across the United States. The purpose of this publication was to look at contemporary trends in the management of uveal melanoma across the United States to determine whether practices are appropriately adopting EPBT, and to investigate demographic and socio-economic factors that might be associated with deviations from this standard of care.

          Material and methods

          The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for patients with uveal melanoma. Data regarding tumor characteristics and treatment were collected. Two-sided Pearson χ 2 test was used to compare categorical frequencies between patients who received globe preserving treatments vs. those who received enucleation. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to determine characteristics predictive for receiving enucleation.

          Results

          The enucleation rate for small/medium tumors (≤ 10 mm apical height and ≤ 16 mm basal diameter) decreased from 20% in 2004 to 10% in 2015. The EPBT rate for large tumors increased from 30% in 2004 to 45% in 2015. Numerous demographic and socio-economic factors were found to be associated with higher rates of enucleation.

          Conclusions

          The overall trend across the nation is a decreased enucleation rate for small/medium tumors, and an increased EPBT rate for large tumors. A fraction of patients who should be candidates for EPBT are instead receiving enucleation, and in this study, we have shown that certain adverse demographic factors are associated with this.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival.

          To determine trends in incidence, treatment, and survival with primary uveal melanoma in the United States over a 36-year period from 1973 to 2008. Systematic review of existing databases. A total of 4070 patients with primary uveal melanoma (International Classification of Disease for Oncology [ICD-O-2] codes C69.3 [choroid], C69.4 [ciliary body and iris], and C69.2 [retina]) derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database in the United States from 1973 to 2008. The significance of trends in age-adjusted incidence, treatment, and 5-year relative survival rates were determined using chi-square testing and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Age-adjusted incidence, form of treatment (surgery, radiation, or both), and 5-year relative survival rates. There were 4070 cases of uveal melanoma representing 3.1% of all recorded cases of melanoma. The majority of cases (98.3%) were reported by hospital inpatient/outpatient clinics. Histopathologic confirmation was available in 2804 cases (72.1% for all years). The mean age-adjusted incidence of uveal melanoma in the United States was 5.1 per million (95% CI, 4.8-5.3). The majority of cases (97.8%) occurred in the white population. There was a statistically significant variation of age-adjusted incidence between sexes (male = 5.8, 95% CI, 5.5-6.2; and female = 4.4, 95% CI, 4.2-4.7). A decreasing trend was observed in patients treated with surgery alone (93.8% for 1973-1975 vs. 28.3% for 2006-2008), whereas a corresponding increase was seen in those treated with radiation (1.8% for 1973-1975 vs. 62.5% for 2006-2008). No change in the 5-year relative survival rate (81.6%) was observed from 1973 to 2008. The age-adjusted incidence of uveal melanoma (5.1 per million) has remained unchanged from 1973 to 2008. Despite a shift toward more conservative treatments, survival has not improved during this time period. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: V. Twelve-year mortality rates and prognostic factors: COMS report No. 28.

            (2006)
            To report refined rates of death and related outcomes by treatment arm through 12 years after primary treatment of choroidal melanoma and to evaluate characteristics of patients and tumors as predictors of relative treatment effectiveness and time to death. Randomized multicenter clinical trial of iodine 125 ((125)I) brachytherapy vs enucleation conducted as part of the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. Eligible patients were free of metastasis and other cancers at enrollment. All patients were followed up for 5 to 15 years at scheduled examinations for metastasis or another cancer or until death. Decedents were classified by the independent Mortality Coding Committee as having histopathologically confirmed melanoma metastasis, suspected melanoma metastasis without histopathologic confirmation, another cancer but not melanoma metastasis, or no malignancy. Deaths from all causes and deaths with histopathologically confirmed melanoma metastasis. Within 12 years after enrollment, 471 of 1317 patients died. Of 515 patients eligible for 12 years of follow-up, 231 (45%) were alive and clinically cancer free 12 years after treatment. For patients in both treatment arms, 5- and 10-year all-cause mortality rates were 19% and 35%, respectively; by 12 years, cumulative all-cause mortality was 43% among patients in the (125)I brachytherapy arm and 41% among those in the enucleation arm. Five-, 10-, and 12-year rates of death with histopathologically confirmed melanoma metastasis were 10%, 18%, and 21%, respectively, in the (125)I brachytherapy arm and 11%, 17%, and 17%, respectively, in the enucleation arm. Older age and larger maximum basal tumor diameter were the primary predictors of time to death from all causes and death with melanoma metastasis. Longer follow-up of patients confirmed the earlier report of no survival differences between patients whose tumors were treated with (125)I brachytherapy and those treated with enucleation. Estimated mortality rates by baseline characteristics should facilitate counseling of patients who have choroidal melanoma of a size and in a location suitable for enucleation or (125)I brachytherapy and no evidence of metastasis or another malignancy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for plaque brachytherapy of uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma.

              (2014)
              To present the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines for plaque brachytherapy of choroidal melanoma and retinoblastoma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Contemp Brachytherapy
                J Contemp Brachytherapy
                JCB
                Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
                Termedia Publishing House
                1689-832X
                2081-2841
                02 April 2022
                April 2022
                : 14
                : 2
                : 123-129
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA,
                [2 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA,
                [3 ]Retina Consultants of Houston, Houston, TX, USA,
                [4 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA,
                [5 ]Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Bin S. Teh, MD, Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 6565 Fannin St., DB1-077, Houston, TX 77030, USA, phone: +1-713-441-4812, fax: +1-713-441-4493, ✉ e-mail: bteh@ 123456houstonmethodist.org
                Article
                46801
                10.5114/jcb.2022.115210
                9044301
                35494177
                2c678306-53a9-46b5-9124-a07de95bdc3e
                Copyright © 2022 Termedia

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

                History
                : 08 December 2021
                : 07 February 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                eye plaque brachytherapy,uveal melanoma,enucleation
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                eye plaque brachytherapy, uveal melanoma, enucleation

                Comments

                Comment on this article