1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Older Adults’ Perspectives of Independence Through Time: Results of a Longitudinal Interview Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives

          Understanding how older people experience independence has implications for person-centered care. Existing understanding of older people’s experience of independence, generated through methods that provide a “snapshot” view of a person’s independence at a given time point, provides little insight into the process of maintaining independence through time. The aim of this study was to explore older participants’ perceptions to understand the processes and resources that were most important for maintaining independence.

          Research Design and Methods

          Two semistructured interviews were conducted longitudinally to explore the perspectives of 12 community-dwelling, older people, aged 76–85 years. A social constructivist approach, using dramaturgical and descriptive codes, facilitated the interpretation of the data. Sixteen analytical questions guided the exploration of participants’ perceptions of independence through time.

          Results

          Older people suggested that objective representations underestimated, and omitted, important aspects of their independence through time. Some participants perceived “snapshot” judgments of their independence as insensitive to their individual values and context. Change over time required some participants to adapt their methods for maintaining independence. The stability of participants’ sense of independence was value dependent and informed by the purpose a participant ascribed to maintaining independence.

          Discussion and Implications

          This study augments the understanding of independence as a complex and multifaceted construct. The findings challenge the congruence of common interpretations of independence with older people’s views, showing areas of commonality, and discrepancy. Exploration of independence in terms of form and function provides an important understanding of how function takes precedence to form in determining the maintenance of independence through time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

            Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is "saturation." Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept "information power" to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?

              Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet little methodological research exists on parameters that influence saturation. Our study compared two approaches to assessing saturation: code saturation and meaning saturation. We examined sample sizes needed to reach saturation in each approach, what saturation meant, and how to assess saturation. Examining 25 in-depth interviews, we found that code saturation was reached at nine interviews, whereby the range of thematic issues was identified. However, 16 to 24 interviews were needed to reach meaning saturation where we developed a richly textured understanding of issues. Thus, code saturation may indicate when researchers have "heard it all," but meaning saturation is needed to "understand it all." We used our results to develop parameters that influence saturation, which may be used to estimate sample sizes for qualitative research proposals or to document in publications the grounds on which saturation was achieved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Decision Editor
                Journal
                Gerontologist
                Gerontologist
                geront
                The Gerontologist
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0016-9013
                1758-5341
                February 2024
                18 June 2023
                18 June 2023
                : 64
                : 2
                : gnad073
                Affiliations
                Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter , Exeter, UK
                Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter , Exeter, UK
                NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter , Exeter, UK
                Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds , Bradford, UK
                Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research , Bradford, UK
                Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter , Exeter, UK
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to: Victoria A. Goodwin, PhD. E-mail: v.goodwin@ 123456exeter.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-3249
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3860-9607
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-1097
                Article
                gnad073
                10.1093/geront/gnad073
                10825833
                37330641
                2bfc2dfe-045c-405b-b160-06a823707054
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 January 2023
                : 27 May 2023
                : 14 July 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health and Care Research, DOI 10.13039/501100000272;
                Funded by: Department of Health and Social Care, DOI 10.13039/501100000276;
                Categories
                Research Article
                AcademicSubjects/SOC02600

                Geriatric medicine
                autonomy and self-efficacy,life course/life span,resilience,person-centered care

                Comments

                Comment on this article