Malignant mesothelioma in Australia 2015: Current incidence and asbestos exposure trends

Detection of malignant cells on cytologic examination of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the diagnostic gold standard for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. The absence of cells is a primary endpoint for most therapeutic trials. Unfortunately, false-negative results are common. Practical strategies are necessary to remedy this problem. Four physician-dependent variables (CSF sample volume, site of CSF sampling, processing time, and frequency of CSF sampling) were identified, and their contributions to the false-negative rate of CSF cytology were evaluated prospectively in 39 patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Retrospective data were analyzed to estimate the importance of these variables in daily practice. False-negative CSF cytology results correlated with small CSF volume (P 25% were processed too slowly. False-negative CSF cytology results are common, but can be minimized by: 1) withdrawing at least 10.5 mL of CSF for cytologic analysis; 2) processing the CSF specimen immediately; 3) obtaining CSF from a site of known leptomeningeal disease; and 4) repeating this procedure once if the initial cytology is negative. Show more

Mortality reports on asbestos exposed cohorts which gave information on exposure levels from which (as a minimum) a cohort average cumulative exposure could be estimated were reviewed. At exposure levels seen in occupational cohorts it is concluded that the exposure specific risk of mesothelioma from the three principal commercial asbestos types is broadly in the ratio 1:100:500 for chrysotile, amosite and crocidolite respectively. For lung cancer the conclusions are less clear cut. Cohorts exposed only to crocidolite or amosite record similar exposure specific risk levels (around 5% excess lung cancer per f/ml.yr); but chrysotile exposed cohorts show a less consistent picture, with a clear discrepancy between the mortality experience of a cohort of xhrysotile textile workers in Carolina and the Quebec miners cohort. Taking account of the excess risk recorded by cohorts with mixed fibre exposures (generally<1%), the Carolina experience looks uptypically high. It is suggested that a best estimate lung cancer risk for chrysotile alone would be 0.1%, with a highest reasonable estimate of 0.5%. The risk differential between chrysotile and the two amphibole fibres for lunc cancer is thus between 1:10 and 1:50. Examination of the inter-study dose response relationship for the amphibole fibres suggests a non-linear relationship for all three cancer endpoints (pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas, and lung cancer). The peritoneal mesothelioma risk is proportional to the square of cumulative exposure, lung cancer risk lies between a linear and square relationship and pleural mesothelioma seems to rise less than linearly with cumulative dose. Although these non-linear relationships provide a best fit ot the data, statistical and other uncertainties mean that a linear relationship remains arguable for pleural and lung tumours (but not or peritoneal tumours). Based on these considerations, and a discussion fo the associated uncertainties, a series of quantified risk summary statements for different elvels of cumulative exposure are presented. Show more