29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mental health prevalence and predictors among university students in nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-national study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The student population has been highly vulnerable to the risk of mental health deterioration during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to reveal the prevalence and predictors of mental health among students in Poland, Slovenia, Czechia, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, Turkey, Israel, and Colombia in a socioeconomic context during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted among 2349 students (69% women) from May–July 2020. Data were collected by means of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Gender Inequality Index (GII), Standard & Poor's Global Ratings, the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), and a sociodemographic survey. Descriptive statistics and Bayesian multilevel skew-normal regression analyses were conducted. The prevalence of high stress, depression, and generalized anxiety symptoms in the total sample was 61.30%, 40.3%, and 30%, respectively. The multilevel Bayesian model showed that female sex was a credible predictor of PSS-10, GAD-7, and PHQ-8 scores. In addition, place of residence (town) and educational level (first-cycle studies) were risk factors for the PHQ-8. This study showed that mental health issues are alarming in the student population. Regular psychological support should be provided to students by universities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

              Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self-report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marco.held@uni-bamberg.de
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                20 September 2021
                20 September 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 18644
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1035.7, ISNI 0000000099214842, Faculty of Medicine, , University of Technology, ; 40-555 Katowice, Poland
                [2 ]GRID grid.107891.6, ISNI 0000 0001 1010 7301, Institute of Psychology, , University of Opole, ; 45-052 Opole, Poland
                [3 ]GRID grid.440608.e, ISNI 0000 0000 9187 132X, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, , Opole University of Technology, ; 45-758 Opole, Poland
                [4 ]GRID grid.29328.32, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1303, Faculty of Economics, , Maria Curie-Sklodowska University in Lublin, ; 20-031 Lublin, Poland
                [5 ]GRID grid.7359.8, ISNI 0000 0001 2325 4853, Department of Psychology, , University of Bamberg, ; 96047 Bamberg, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.412740.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0688 0879, Faculty of Management, , University of Primorska, ; 6101 Koper, Slovenia
                [7 ]GRID grid.18098.38, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0562, Department of Special Education, , University of Haifa, ; 3498838 Haifa, Israel
                [8 ]The Center for Compassionate Mindful Education, 69106 Tel Aviv, Israel
                [9 ]GRID grid.12136.37, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0546, Bob Shapell School of Social Work, , Tel-Aviv University, ; 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
                [10 ]GRID grid.32495.39, ISNI 0000 0000 9795 6893, Institute of Industrial Management, Economics and Trade, , Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, ; St. Petersburg, 195251 Russia
                [11 ]GRID grid.445848.1, Department of Theory and Methods of Physical Culture, , Lviv State University of Physical Culture, ; Lviv, 79007 Ukraine
                [12 ]GRID grid.7112.5, ISNI 0000000122191520, Department of Regional and Business Economics, , Mendel University in Brno, ; Brno, 613 00 Czech Republic
                [13 ]GRID grid.448543.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0369 6517, Health Management Department, , Bingöl University, ; Bingöl, 12000 Turkey
                [14 ]GRID grid.411445.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0775 759X, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, , Ataturk University, ; Erzurum, 25240 Turkey
                [15 ]GRID grid.448590.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0399 2543, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, , Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University, ; Ağrı, 04000 Turkey
                [16 ]GRID grid.412191.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2205 5940, School of Management, , Universidad del Rosario, ; 111711 Bogotá, PC Colombia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-7091
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8111-4469
                Article
                97697
                10.1038/s41598-021-97697-3
                8452732
                34545120
                288a07fa-f3ef-424d-b00a-3134e44308d1
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 March 2021
                : 23 August 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg (3120)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                quality of life,population screening
                Uncategorized
                quality of life, population screening

                Comments

                Comment on this article