7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers to recruiting primary care practices for implementation research during COVID-19: A qualitative study of practice coaches from the Stop Unhealthy (STUN) Alcohol Use Now trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought widespread change to health care practice and research. With heightened stress in the general population, increased unhealthy alcohol use, and added pressures on primary care practices, comes the need to better understand how we can continue practice-based research and address public health priorities amid the ongoing pandemic. The current study considers barriers and facilitators to conducting such research, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, within the context of recruiting practices for the STop UNhealthy (STUN) Alcohol Use Now trial. The STUN trial uses practice facilitation to implement screening and interventions for unhealthy alcohol use in primary care practices across the state of North Carolina. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 15 practice coaches to discuss their recruitment experiences before and after recruitment was paused due to the pandemic. An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes. Results: Pandemic-related barriers, including challenges in staffing, finances, and new COVID-19-related workflows, were most prominent. Competing priorities, such as quality improvement measures, North Carolina's implementation of Medicaid managed care, and organizational structures hampered recruitment efforts. Coaches also described barriers specific to the project and to the topic of alcohol. Several facilitators were identified, including the rising importance of behavioral health due to the pandemic, as well as existing relationships between practice coaches and practices. Conclusions: Difficulty managing competing priorities and obstacles within existing practice infrastructure inhibit the ability to participate in practice-based research and implementation of evidence-based practices. Lessons learned from this trial may inform strategies to recruit practices into research and to gain buy-in from practices in adopting evidence-based practices more generally.

          Plain Language Summary

          What is known: Unhealthy alcohol use is a significant public health issue, which has been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Screening and brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use is an evidence-based practice shown to help reduce drinking-related behaviors, yet it remains rare in practice. What this study adds: Using a qualitative approach, we identify barriers and facilitators to recruiting primary care practices into a funded trial that uses practice facilitation to address unhealthy alcohol use. We identify general insights as well as those specific to the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers are primarily related to competing priorities, incentives, and lack of infrastructure. Facilitators are related to framing of the project and the anticipated level and type of resources needed to address unhealthy alcohol use especially as the pandemic wanes. Implications: Our findings provide information on barriers and facilitators to recruiting primary care practices for behavioral health projects and to implementing these activities. Using our findings, we provide a discussion of suggestions for conducting these types of projects in the future which may be of interest to researchers, practice managers, and providers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

          D R Thomas (2006)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2010 National and State Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption.

            Excessive alcohol use cost the U.S. $223.5 billion in 2006. Given economic shifts in the U.S. since 2006, more-current estimates are needed to help inform the planning of prevention strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach.

              Despite rapid advances in the clinical and psycho-educational management of diabetes, the quality of care received by the average patient with diabetes remains lackluster. The "collaborative" approach--the Breakthrough Series (BTS; Institute for Healthcare Improvement [IHI]; Boston)--coupled with a Chronic Care Model was used in an effort to improve clinical care of diabetes in 26 health care organizations. Descriptive and pre-post data are presented from 23 health care organizations participating in the 13-month (August 1998-September 1999) BTS to improve diabetes care. The BTS combined the system changes suggested by the chronic care model, rapid cycle improvement, and evidence-based clinical content to assist teams with change efforts. The characteristics of organizations participating in the diabetes BTS, the collaborative process and content, and results of system-level changes are described. Twenty-three of 26 teams completed participation. Both chart review and self-report data on care processes and clinical outcomes suggested improvement based on changes teams made in the collaborative. Many of the organizations evidencing the largest improvements were community health centers, which had the fewest resources and the most challenged populations. The initial Chronic Illness BTS was sufficiently encouraging that replication and evaluation of the BTS collaborative model is being conducted in more than 50 health care systems for diabetes, congestive heart failure, depression, and asthma. This model represents a feasible method of improving the quality of care across different health care organizations and across multiple chronic illnesses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Implement Res Pract
                Implement Res Pract
                IRP
                spirp
                Implementation Research and Practice
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2633-4895
                24 April 2022
                Jan-Dec 2022
                : 3
                : 26334895221094297
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Rural Health Research, Ringgold 4154, universityEast Tennessee State University; , Johnson City, TN, USA
                [2 ]Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Ringgold 51761, universityUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [3 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Ringgold 12305, universityThe Ohio State University; , Columbus, OH, USA
                [4 ]Ringgold 26521, universityNorth Carolina Area Health Education Centers; , CB 7165, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Casey P. Balio, Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, 1276 Gilbreath Dr., Johnson City, TN 37614, USA. Email: balioc@ 123456etsu.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2987-4268
                Article
                10.1177_26334895221094297
                10.1177/26334895221094297
                9924268
                27ced3f0-4a8e-4973-81b3-f3acc256d9c6
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000133;
                Award ID: 1R18HS027078-01
                Categories
                Original Empirical Research
                Custom metadata
                ts19
                January-December 2022

                quality improvement,implementation initiative < implementation,stages of implementation,behavioral health < service system,practice context,coaching

                Comments

                Comment on this article