31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Coronavirus (COVID‐19) in the United Kingdom: A personality‐based perspective on concerns and intention to self‐isolate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Public behaviour change is necessary to contain the spread of coronavirus (COVID‐19). Based on the reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) framework, this study presents an examination of individual differences in some relevant psychological factors.

          Design

          Cross‐sectional psychometric.

          Methods

          UK respondents ( N = 202) completed a personality questionnaire (RST‐PQ), measures of illness attitudes, concerns about the impact of coronavirus on health services and socio‐economic infrastructures, personal safety, and likelihood of voluntary self‐isolation.

          Results

          Respondents most concerned were older, had negative illness attitudes, and scored higher on reward reactivity (RR), indicating the motivation to take positive approach action despite prevailing worry/anxiety. Personal safety concerns were highest in those with negative illness attitudes and higher fight–flight–freeze system (FFFS, reflecting fear/avoidance) scores. Results suggest people are experiencing psychological conflict: between the urge to stay safe (FFFF‐related) and the desire to maintain a normal, pleasurable (RR‐related) life. Ways of ameliorating conflict may include maladaptive behaviours (panic buying), reflecting reward‐related displacement activity. Intended self‐isolation related to FFFS, but also low behavioural inhibition system (related to anxiety) scores. Older people reported themselves less likely to self‐isolate.

          Conclusions

          Interventions need to consider individual differences in psychological factors in behaviour change, and we discuss relevant literature to inform policy makers and communicators.

          Statement of contribution

          What is already known on this subject?

          • Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) personality systems can influence perception of persuasive health messages.

          • However, there is limited evidence for their direct effects on health concerns and behaviours, and none relating to specific infectious diseases.

          What does this study add?

          • Reward reactivity (RR) is associated with concern about impact of coronavirus on the NHS and other social infrastructures, indicating the motivation to take positive‐approach action despite worry/anxiety.

          • Personal safety concerns are related to fight–flight–freeze system traits (FFFS, reflecting fear/avoidance).

          • Intended self‐isolation related to FFFS, but also low behavioural inhibition system (related to anxiety) scores.

          • Older people reported themselves less likely to self‐isolate.

          • Results suggest psychological conflict: between the urge to stay safe (FFFF‐related) and the desire to maintain a normal, pleasurable life (RR‐related).

          • Ways of ameliorating conflict may include maladaptive behaviours (panic buying), reflecting reward‐related displacement activity

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Emotional Contagion

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis.

            To derive a robust and comprehensive estimate of the overall relation between Big Five personality traits and health variables using metasynthesis (i.e., second-order meta-analysis).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review

              This article provides an overview of the recent literature on the use of internet-based testing to address important questions in perception research. Our goal is to provide a starting point for the perception researcher who is keen on assessing this tool for their own research goals. Internet-based testing has several advantages over in-lab research, including the ability to reach a relatively broad set of participants and to quickly and inexpensively collect large amounts of empirical data, via services such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk or Prolific Academic. In many cases, the quality of online data appears to match that collected in lab research. Generally-speaking, online participants tend to be more representative of the population at large than those recruited for lab based research. There are, though, some important caveats, when it comes to collecting data online. It is obviously much more difficult to control the exact parameters of stimulus presentation (such as display characteristics) with online research. There are also some thorny ethical elements that need to be considered by experimenters. Strengths and weaknesses of the online approach, relative to others, are highlighted, and recommendations made for those researchers who might be thinking about conducting their own studies using this increasingly-popular approach to research in the psychological sciences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ambacon@plymouth.ac.uk
                Journal
                Br J Health Psychol
                Br J Health Psychol
                10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8287
                BJHP
                British Journal of Health Psychology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1359-107X
                2044-8287
                29 April 2020
                : 10.1111/bjhp.12423
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Psychology University of Plymouth UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychology City, University of London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence should be addressed to Alison M. Bacon, School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK (email: ambacon@ 123456plymouth.ac.uk ).

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-3814
                Article
                BJHP12423
                10.1111/bjhp.12423
                7267391
                32348015
                276cee63-c617-42be-b761-5dc6c424e18a
                © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 23 March 2020
                : 09 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Pages: 10, Words: 10095
                Categories
                Brief Report
                Brief Reports
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.3 mode:remove_FC converted:03.06.2020

                coronavirus,reinforcement sensitivity theory,self‐isolation,fear,anxiety,depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content47

                Cited by55

                Most referenced authors463