11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Maintaining or improving quality of life (QoL) and well-being is a universal goal across the lifespan. Being physically active has been suggested as one way to enhance QoL and well-being. In this systematic review, conducted in part for the 2018 U.S. Health and Human Services Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Scientific Advisory Committee Report, we examined the relationship between physical activity (PA) and QoL and well-being experienced by the general population across the lifespan and by persons with psychiatric and neurologic conditions. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and pooled analyses from 2006 to 2018 were used for the evidence base. Strong evidence (predominantly from randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) demonstrated that, for adults aged 18–65 years and older adults (primarily 65 years and older), PA improves QoL and well-being when compared with minimal or no-treatment controls. Moderate evidence indicated that PA improves QoL and well-being in individuals with schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease, and limited evidence indicated that PA improves QoL and well-being for youth and for adults with major clinical depression or bipolar disorder. Insufficient evidence existed for individuals with dementia because of a small number of studies with mixed results. Future high-quality research designs should include RCTs involving longer interventions testing different modes and intensities of PA in diverse populations of healthy people and individuals with cognitive (e.g., dementia) and mental health conditions (e.g., schizophrenia) to precisely characterize the effects of different forms of PA on aspects of QoL and well-being.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

            This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is Suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Translational Behavioral Medicine
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1869-6716
                1613-9860
                October 2020
                October 12 2020
                October 12 2020
                October 2020
                October 12 2020
                October 12 2020
                : 10
                : 5
                : 1098-1109
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, Center for Research on Health and Aging, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
                [2 ]Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
                [3 ]Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
                [4 ]Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
                [5 ]Department of Psychology, Brain Aging and Cognitive Health Lab, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
                [6 ]Department of Psychology and Department of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Center for Cognitive and Brain Health, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
                [7 ]Office of Disease Prevention, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
                [8 ]ICF Next, Fairfax, VA, USA
                [9 ]Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Urbana, IL, USA
                [10 ]Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
                [11 ]Atlanta, GA, USA
                Article
                10.1093/tbm/ibz198
                33044541
                2757cc80-eed4-469b-9d10-82e7edb83743
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article