36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      More than colour attraction: behavioural functions of flower patterns

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Insects perceive separately chromatic and achromatic aspects of colour patterns.

          • Flowers present colour patterns as individual or shared displays.

          • Visual appearance of flowers changes considerably with viewing distance.

          • Pollinators use close-up views for landing and handling of flowers.

          • Further away shared displays within the visual scene guide approach trajectories.

          Abstract

          Flower patterns are thought to influence foraging decisions of insect pollinators. However, the resolution of insect compound eyes is poor. Insects perceive flower patterns only from short distances when they initiate landings or search for reward on the flower. From further away flower displays jointly form larger-sized patterns within the visual scene that will guide the insect's flight. Chromatic and achromatic cues in such patterns may help insects to find, approach and learn rewarded locations in a flower patch, bringing them close enough to individual flowers. Flight trajectories and the spatial resolution of chromatic and achromatic vision in insects determine the effectiveness of floral displays, and both need to be considered in studies of plant–pollinator communication.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Energetics of Pollination

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Detection and learning of floral electric fields by bumblebees.

            Insects use several senses to forage, detecting floral cues such as color, shape, pattern, and volatiles. We report a formerly unappreciated sensory modality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), detection of floral electric fields. These fields act as floral cues, which are affected by the visit of naturally charged bees. Like visual cues, floral electric fields exhibit variations in pattern and structure, which can be discriminated by bumblebees. We also show that such electric field information contributes to the complex array of floral cues that together improve a pollinator's memory of floral rewards. Because floral electric fields can change within seconds, this sensory modality may facilitate rapid and dynamic communication between flowers and their pollinators.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Memory use in insect visual navigation.

              The navigational strategies that are used by foraging ants and bees to reach a goal are similar to those of birds and mammals. Species from all these groups use path integration and memories of visual landmarks to navigate through familiar terrain. Insects have far fewer neural resources than vertebrates, so data from insects might be useful in revealing the essential components of efficient navigation. Recent work on ants and bees has uncovered a major role for associative links between long-term memories. We emphasize the roles of these associations in the reliable recognition of visual landmarks and the reliable performance of learnt routes. It is unknown whether such associations also provide insects with a map-like representation of familiar terrain. We suggest, however, that landmarks act primarily as signposts that tell insects what particular action they need to perform, rather than telling them where they are.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Opin Insect Sci
                Curr Opin Insect Sci
                Current Opinion in Insect Science
                Elsevier
                2214-5745
                2214-5753
                1 December 2015
                December 2015
                : 12
                : 64-70
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Exeter, Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Department of Psychology, Exeter, UK
                [2 ]University of Auckland, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Auckland, New Zealand
                Article
                S2214-5745(15)00136-4
                10.1016/j.cois.2015.09.005
                4804388
                27064650
                26947b14-d011-40e0-b46b-5257c8d72cae
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content423

                Cited by35

                Most referenced authors251