21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Relationships of Intergroup Ideologies to Ethnic Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis

      1 , 2
      Personality and Social Psychology Review
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This meta-analysis summarizes the results of research on the relationships of majority group members’ endorsement of assimilation, colorblindness, multiculturalism, and the relative relationships of colorblindness and multiculturalism to ethnic prejudice. Random effects analyses found that assimilation was positively related to explicit prejudice ( g. = 0.80), multiculturalism was negatively related to both explicit ( g. = −0.26) and implicit prejudice ( g. = −0.19), and colorblindness was negatively related to explicit prejudice ( g. = −0.07). Multiculturalism was more closely associated with low prejudice than colorblindness ( g. = 0.15). Effect sizes varied as a function of methodology (experimental vs. correlational), country in which research was conducted (United States vs. other countries), and, in experimental studies of multiculturalism, type of prime used (abstract vs. concrete). Discussion points include methodological issues, groups used as targets of prejudice, national diversity norms, additional issues raised in the studies reviewed, and directions for future research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice".

              The authors suggest that the traditional conception of prejudice--as a general attitude or evaluation--can problematically obscure the rich texturing of emotions that people feel toward different groups. Derived from a sociofunctional approach, the authors predicted that groups believed to pose qualitatively distinct threats to in-group resources or processes would evoke qualitatively distinct and functionally relevant emotional reactions. Participants' reactions to a range of social groups provided a data set unique in the scope of emotional reactions and threat beliefs explored. As predicted, different groups elicited different profiles of emotion and threat reactions, and this diversity was often masked by general measures of prejudice and threat. Moreover, threat and emotion profiles were associated with one another in the manner predicted: Specific classes of threat were linked to specific, functionally relevant emotions, and groups similar in the threat profiles they elicited were also similar in the emotion profiles they elicited. 2005 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Personality and Social Psychology Review
                Pers Soc Psychol Rev
                SAGE Publications
                1088-8683
                1532-7957
                October 07 2018
                August 2019
                April 04 2018
                August 2019
                : 23
                : 3
                : 207-237
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA
                [2 ]University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
                Article
                10.1177/1088868318761423
                29616588
                25c10969-5436-4aad-b564-c063b5177a37
                © 2019

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content563

                Cited by19

                Most referenced authors1,135