41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High adherence to the ‘Wise List’ treatment recommendations in Stockholm: a 15-year retrospective review of a multifaceted approach promoting rational use of medicines

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 1 , 7
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      BMJ Open
      BMJ Publishing Group
      Adherence, Drug and therapeutics committee, Essential medicines, prescribing, Rational Use of Medicines, Health systems

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To present the ‘Wise List’ (a formulary of essential medicines for primary and specialised care in Stockholm Healthcare Region) and assess adherence to the recommendations over a 15-year period.

          Design

          Retrospective analysis of all prescription data in the Stockholm Healthcare Region between 2000 and 2015 in relation to the Wise List recommendations during the same time period.

          Setting

          All outpatient care in the Stockholm Healthcare Region.

          Participants

          All prescribers in the Stockholm Healthcare Region.

          Main outcome measures

          The number of core and complementary substances included in the Wise List, the adherence to recommendations by Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) 1st level using defined daily doses (DDDs) adjusted to the DDD for 2015, adherence to recommendations over time measured by dispensed prescriptions yearly between 2002 and 2015.

          Results

          The number of recommended core substances was stable (175–212). Overall adherence to the recommendations for core medicines for all prescribers increased from 75% to 84% (2000 to 2015). The adherence to recommendations in primary care for core medicines increased from 80% to 90% (2005 to 2015) with decreasing range in practice variation (32% to 13%). Hospital prescriber adherence to core medicine recommendations was stable but increased for the combination core and complementary medicines from 77% to 88% (2007 to 2015). Adherence varied between the 4 therapeutic areas studied.

          Conclusions

          High and increasing adherence to the Wise List recommendations was seen for all prescriber categories. The transparent process for developing recommendations involving respected experts and clinicians using strict criteria for handling potential conflicts of interests, feedback to prescribers, continuous medical education and financial incentives are possible contributing factors. High-quality evidence-based recommendations to prescribers, such as the Wise List, disseminated through a multifaceted approach, will become increasingly important and should be developed further to include recommendations and introduction protocols for new expensive medicines.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register--opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months.

          To describe the content and potentials of the new Swedish national register on prescribed and dispensed medicines. The Swedish Prescribed Drug Register contains information about age, sex and unique identifier of the patient as well as the prescriber's profession and practice. Information regarding drug utilization and expenditures for prescribed drugs in the entire Swedish population was extracted from the first six months July-December 2005 and compared with total drug sales in the country including OTC and hospital use. The total quantity of drugs sold in Sweden was 2666 million DDDs, corresponding to 1608 DDD/1000 inhabitants daily. The total expenditures were 1.6 billion Euro. The prescribed drugs, included in the register, accounted for 84% of the total utilization and 77% of the total expenditures. About half of all men and two-thirds of all women in the country purchased drugs. The proportion increased by age. The most common drugs for chronic treatment were diuretics among women (8.8% of the population) and antithrombotic agents among men (7.6%). Psychotropic drugs, corticosteroids and analgesics were more common among women, while men used antithrombotic agents, antidiabetic drugs, lipid lowering agents and ACE inhibitors to a greater extent. The new register provides valuable data on exposure to drugs and is useful to study patterns of drug utilization. The possibilities for record linkage to other health registers gives from an international perspective good opportunities to explore drug and disease associations and the risks, benefits, effectiveness and health economical effects of drug use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care

            The Lancet, 362(9391), 1225-1230
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.

              To determine the effectiveness of different types of interventions in improving health professional performance and health outcomes. MEDLINE, SCISEARCH, CINAHL and the Research and Development Resource Base in CME were searched for trials of educational interventions in the health care professions published between 1970 and 1993 inclusive. Studies were selected if they provided objective measurements of health professional performance or health outcomes and employed random or quasi-random allocation methods in their study designs to assign individual subjects or groups. Interventions included such activities as conferences, outreach visits, the use of local opinion leaders, audit and feedback, and reminder systems. Details extracted from the studies included the study design; the unit of allocation (e.g., patient, provider, practice, hospital); the characteristics of the targeted health care professionals, educational interventions and patients (when appropriate); and the main outcome measure. The inclusion criteria were met by 102 trials. Areas of behaviour change included general patient management, preventive services, prescribing practices, treatment of specific conditions such as hypertension or diabetes, and diagnostic service or hospital utilization. Dissemination-only strategies, such as conferences or the mailing of unsolicited materials, demonstrated little or no changes in health professional behaviour or health outcome when used alone. More complex interventions, such as the use of outreach visits or local opinion leaders, ranged from ineffective to highly effective but were most often moderately effective (resulting in reductions of 20% to 50% in the incidence of inappropriate performance). There are no "magic bullets" for improving the quality of health care, but there are a wide range of interventions available that, if used appropriately, could lead to important improvements in professional practice and patient outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2017
                2 May 2017
                : 7
                : 4
                : e014345
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                [3 ]Stockholm Drug and Therapeutics Committee, Public Healthcare Services Committee , Stockholm, Sweden
                [4 ]Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [5 ]Department of Quality and Development, Södersjukhuset , Stockholm, Sweden
                [6 ]Public Healthcare Services Committee , Stockholm, Sweden
                [7 ]Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Internal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [8 ]Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Jaran Eriksen; jaran.eriksen@ 123456ki.se
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1146-5615
                Article
                bmjopen-2016-014345
                10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014345
                5775463
                28465306
                21682057-ed97-4ae2-a5ef-01c385a89db7
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 5 October 2016
                : 26 January 2017
                : 13 February 2017
                Categories
                Health Services Research
                Research
                1506
                1704
                1723
                1703
                1701
                1694

                Medicine
                adherence,drug and therapeutics committee,essential medicines,prescribing,rational use of medicines,health systems

                Comments

                Comment on this article