24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: an international exploratory study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • We investigated the change in visitation of urban green spaces (UGS) during COVID-19 pandemic.

          • Social isolation reduced extent, type and distance of visited UGS on the basis of legal restrictions.

          • Reasons for visiting UGS changed from non-essential before the pandemic to essential during it.

          • Respondents missed visiting UGS regardless of the view of UGS from their window.

          • Respondents expressed the need for UGS integrated within the urban fabric.

          Abstract

          Urban green space (UGS) is an essential element in the urban environment, providing multiple ecosystem services as well as beneficial effects on physical and mental health. In a time of societal crisis these effects may be amplified, but ensuring that they are maintained requires effective planning and management – which is a complex challenge given the rapid changes in modern society and the need for continual adaptation. This study aims to identify the drivers that normally attract visitors to UGS, and to assess the effects of social isolation on the usage and perception of UGS during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted an online survey during the period in which restrictive measures were imposed in response to the pandemic (March-May 2020), in Croatia, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Slovenia and Spain.

          Results showed that urban residents normally have a need for accessible UGS, mainly for physical exercise, relaxing and observing nature. The reduction in UGS visitation during the containment period was related to distinct changes in the motivations of those who did visit, with a relative increase in "necessary activities" such as taking the dog out, and a reduction in activities that could be considered non-essential or high-risk such as meeting people or observing nature. Behavioral changes related to proximity were also observed, with an increase in people walking to small urban gardens nearby (e.g. in Italy) or tree-lined streets (e.g. in Spain, Israel), and people traveling by car to green areas outside the city (e.g. in Lithuania). What the respondents missed the most about UGS during the pandemic was "spending time outdoors" and "meeting other people" – highlighting that during the COVID-19 isolation, UGS was important for providing places of solace and respite, and for allowing exercise and relaxation. Respondents expressed the need for urban greenery even when legally mandated access was limited – and many proposed concrete suggestions for improved urban planning that integrates green spaces of different sizes within the fabric of cities and neighborhoods, so that all residents have access to UGS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health - A systematic review of reviews.

            Increasing urbanisation, changing disease scenarios, and current predictions of climate change impacts require innovative strategies for providing healthy and sustainable cities, now and in the future. The recently coined concept, Nature-based solutions (NBS), is one such strategy referring to actions that are inspired by, supported by, or copied from nature, designed to address a range of environmental challenges. The objective with this article is to evaluate the evidence on public health benefits of exposure to natural environments and explore how this knowledge could be framed within the NBS concept. We conducted a systematic review of reviews following established methodology, including keyword search in several databases, predefined inclusion criteria, and a data extraction in accordance with the PICOS structure. We reviewed literature on associations between public health and natural environments in relation to pathways - sociobehavioural/cultural ecosystem services (e.g. stress and physical activity) and regulating ecosystem services (e.g. heat reduction) - or defined health outcomes (e.g. cardiovascular mortality). The results show that there is strong evidence for improved affect as well as on heat reduction from urban natural environments. These conditions may mediate the effect seen on cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality by exposure to natural environments. By also reviewing existing literature on NBS and health, we phrase the results within the NBS context, providing guidelines on how public health and well-being could be integrated into implementation of NBS for resilient and liveable urban landscapes and health in a changing climate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health.

              This study investigates whether the presence of green space can attenuate negative health impacts of stressful life events. Individual-level data on health and socio-demographic characteristics were drawn from a representative two-stage sample of 4529 Dutch respondents to the second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2), conducted in 2000-2002. Health measures included: (1) the number of health complaints in the last 14 days; (2) perceived mental health (measured by the GHQ-12); and (3) a single item measure of perceived general health ranging from 'excellent' to 'poor'. Percentages of green space in a 1-km and 3-km radius around the home were derived from the 2001 National Land cover Classification database (LGN4). Data were analysed using multilevel regression analysis, with GP practices as the group-level units. All analyses were controlled for age, gender, income, education level, and level of urbanity. The results show that the relationships of stressful life events with number of health complaints and perceived general health were significantly moderated by amount of green space in a 3-km radius. Respondents with a high amount of green space in a 3-km radius were less affected by experiencing a stressful life event than respondents with a low amount of green space in this radius. The same pattern was observed for perceived mental health, although it was marginally significant. The moderating effects of green space were found only for green space within 3 km, and not for green space within 1 km of residents' homes, presumably because the 3-km indicator is more affected by the presence of larger areas of green space, that are supposed to sustain deeper forms of restoration. These results support the notion that green space can provide a buffer against the negative health impact of stressful life events. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Urban For Urban Green
                Urban For Urban Green
                Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
                Published by Elsevier GmbH.
                1618-8667
                1610-8167
                16 October 2020
                16 October 2020
                : 126888
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council, via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
                [b ]Public Parks and Gardens, Calle Campo de La Estrada N2 Portal C 3 D, 15001, A Coruña, Spain
                [c ]Department of Botany, Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research, IISTA-CEAMA, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, 18071, Granada, Spain
                [d ]Center for Modelling and Monitoring Ecosystems, School of Forest Engineering, Universidad Mayor, Jose Toribio Medina 29, Santiago, Chile
                [e ]Croatian Forest Research Institute, Cvjetno naselje 41, 10450, Jastrebarsko, Croatia
                [f ]Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, 84990, Israel
                [g ]Geography and the Human Environment Department, The Porter School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, POB 39040, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel
                [h ]Siauliai University, P. Višinskio street 25-115, 76351, Šiauliai, Lithuania
                [i ]Institute for Spatial Policies, Tržaška 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [j ]JP VOKA SNAGA d.o.o., Nature conservation unit Landscape park Tivoli, Rožnik and Šiška hill. Vodovodna cesta 90, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [k ]Department of Agro-Environmental Sciences, University of Bari, Via Amendola, 165/A, 70126, Bari, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council, via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
                Article
                S1618-8667(20)30705-6 126888
                10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888
                7566824
                33100944
                20f9aa63-56aa-43e0-b1a7-1320bdba2a0b
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier GmbH.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 12 June 2020
                : 12 October 2020
                : 13 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                citizen perceptions,ecosystem services,green areas,physical isolation,quarantine

                Comments

                Comment on this article