22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Why Be a Shrub? A Basic Model and Hypotheses for the Adaptive Values of a Common Growth Form

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Shrubs are multi-stemmed short woody plants, more widespread than trees, important in many ecosystems, neglected in ecology compared to herbs and trees, but currently in focus due to their global expansion. We present a novel model based on scaling relationships and four hypotheses to explain the adaptive significance of shrubs, including a review of the literature with a test of one hypothesis. Our model describes advantages for a small shrub compared to a small tree with the same above-ground woody volume, based on larger cross-sectional stem area, larger area of photosynthetic tissue in bark and stem, larger vascular cambium area, larger epidermis (bark) area, and larger area for sprouting, and faster production of twigs and canopy. These components form our Hypothesis 1 that predicts higher growth rate for a small shrub than a small tree. This prediction was supported by available relevant empirical studies (14 publications). Further, a shrub will produce seeds faster than a tree (Hypothesis 2), multiple stems in shrubs insure future survival and growth if one or more stems die (Hypothesis 3), and three structural traits of short shrub stems improve survival compared to tall tree stems (Hypothesis 4)—all hypotheses have some empirical support. Multi-stemmed trees may be distinguished from shrubs by more upright stems, reducing bending moment. Improved understanding of shrubs can clarify their recent expansion on savannas, grasslands, and alpine heaths. More experiments and other empirical studies, followed by more elaborate models, are needed to understand why the shrub growth form is successful in many habitats.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs.

          The commonly observed high diversity of trees in tropical rain forests and corals on tropical reefs is a nonequilibrium state which, if not disturbed further, will progress toward a low-diversity equilibrium community. This may not happen if gradual changes in climate favor different species. If equilibrium is reached, a lesser degree of diversity may be sustained by niche diversification or by a compensatory mortality that favors inferior competitors. However, tropical forests and reefs are subject to severe disturbances often enough that equilibrium may never be attained.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes

            Understanding and predicting ecosystem functioning (e.g., carbon and water fluxes) and the role of soils in carbon storage requires an accurate assessment of plant rooting distributions. Here, in a comprehensive literature synthesis, we analyze rooting patterns for terrestrial biomes and compare distributions for various plant functional groups. We compiled a database of 250 root studies, subdividing suitable results into 11 biomes, and fitted the depth coefficient β to the data for each biome (Gale and Grigal 1987). β is a simple numerical index of rooting distribution based on the asymptotic equation Y=1-βd, where d = depth and Y = the proportion of roots from the surface to depth d. High values of β correspond to a greater proportion of roots with depth. Tundra, boreal forest, and temperate grasslands showed the shallowest rooting profiles (β=0.913, 0.943, and 0.943, respectively), with 80-90% of roots in the top 30 cm of soil; deserts and temperate coniferous forests showed the deepest profiles (β=0.975 and 0.976, respectively) and had only 50% of their roots in the upper 30 cm. Standing root biomass varied by over an order of magnitude across biomes, from approximately 0.2 to 5 kg m-2. Tropical evergreen forests had the highest root biomass (5 kg m-2), but other forest biomes and sclerophyllous shrublands were of similar magnitude. Root biomass for croplands, deserts, tundra and grasslands was below 1.5 kg m-2. Root/shoot (R/S) ratios were highest for tundra, grasslands, and cold deserts (ranging from 4 to 7); forest ecosystems and croplands had the lowest R/S ratios (approximately 0.1 to 0.5). Comparing data across biomes for plant functional groups, grasses had 44% of their roots in the top 10 cm of soil. (β=0.952), while shrubs had only 21% in the same depth increment (β=0.978). The rooting distribution of all temperate and tropical trees was β=0.970 with 26% of roots in the top 10 cm and 60% in the top 30 cm. Overall, the globally averaged root distribution for all ecosystems was β=0.966 (r 2=0.89) with approximately 30%, 50%, and 75% of roots in the top 10 cm, 20 cm, and 40 cm, respectively. We discuss the merits and possible shortcomings of our analysis in the context of root biomass and root functioning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Vulnerability of Xylem to Cavitation and Embolism

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                26 July 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 1095
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg Göteborg, Sweden
                [2] 2Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg Göteborg, Sweden
                [3] 3Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Linnaeus University Växjö, Sweden
                Author notes

                Edited by: Alexander Bucksch, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

                Reviewed by: Gerald Schoenknecht, Oklahoma State University–Stillwater, USA; Roman Zweifel, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Forest Dynamics, Switzerland; Masha Van Der Sande, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Frank Götmark frank.gotmark@ 123456gu.se

                This article was submitted to Plant Biophysics and Modeling, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2016.01095
                4961008
                27507981
                200bd6b8-370a-4522-94ae-e9badb83c60a
                Copyright © 2016 Götmark, Götmark and Jensen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 08 April 2016
                : 11 July 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 110, Pages: 14, Words: 11607
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Hypothesis and Theory

                Plant science & Botany
                woody plants,stem,multi-stemmed,shrubland,scrub,tree,growth,canopy
                Plant science & Botany
                woody plants, stem, multi-stemmed, shrubland, scrub, tree, growth, canopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article