39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Ginglymodian Fishes (Actinopterygii: Neopterygii)

      research-article
      *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Ginglymodi is one of the most common, though poorly understood groups of neopterygians, which includes gars, macrosemiiforms, and “semionotiforms.” In particular, the phylogenetic relationships between the widely distributed “semionotiforms,” and between them and other ginglymodians have been enigmatic. Here, the phylogenetic relationships between eight of the 11 “semionotiform” genera, five genera of living and fossil gars and three macrosemiid genera, are analysed through cladistic analysis, based on 90 morphological characters and 37 taxa, including 7 out-group taxa. The results of the analysis show that the Ginglymodi includes two main lineages: Lepisosteiformes and †Semionotiformes. The genera † Pliodetes, † Araripelepidotes, † Lepidotes, † Scheenstia, and † Isanichthys are lepisosteiforms, and not semionotiforms, as previously thought, and these taxa extend the stratigraphic range of the lineage leading to gars back up to the Early Jurassic. A monophyletic † Lepidotes is restricted to the Early Jurassic species, whereas the strongly tritoral species previously referred to † Lepidotes are referred to † Scheenstia. Other species previously referred to † Lepidotes represent other genera or new taxa. The macrosemiids are well nested within semionotiforms, together with †Semionotidae, here restricted to † Semionotus, and a new family including † Callipurbeckia n. gen. minor (previously referred to † Lepidotes), † Macrosemimimus, † Tlayuamichin, † Paralepidotus, and † Semiolepis. Due to the numerous taxonomic changes needed according to the phylogenetic analysis, this article also includes formal taxonomic definitions and diagnoses for all generic and higher taxa, which are new or modified. The study of Mesozoic ginglymodians led to confirm Patterson’s observation that these fishes show morphological affinities with both halecomorphs and teleosts. Therefore, the compilation of large data sets including the Mesozoic ginglymodians and the re-evaluation of several hypotheses of homology are essential to test the hypotheses of the Halecostomi vs. the Holostei, which is one of the major topics in the evolution of Mesozoic vertebrates and the origin of modern fish faunas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references156

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          CONCEPTS AND TESTS OF HOMOLOGY IN THE CLADISTIC PARADIGM

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Outgroup Analysis and Parsimony

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Comprehensive Phylogenetic Study of Amiid Fishes (Amiidae) Based on Comparative Skeletal Anatomy. an Empirical Search for Interconnected Patterns of Natural History

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                11 July 2012
                : 7
                : 7
                : e39370
                Affiliations
                [1]Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, München, Germany
                Biodiversity Insitute of Ontario - University of Guelph, Canada
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: ALA. Performed the experiments: ALA. Analyzed the data: ALA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ALA. Wrote the paper: ALA.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-01423
                10.1371/journal.pone.0039370
                3394768
                22808031
                1ffc4c1c-06c2-4375-b912-c4130693f1b4
                Adriana López-Arbarello. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 4 January 2012
                : 15 May 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 44
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Evolutionary Biology
                Evolutionary Systematics
                Taxonomy
                Animal Taxonomy
                Cladistics
                Phylogenetics
                Organismal Evolution
                Animal Evolution
                Zoology
                Animal Phylogenetics
                Animal Taxonomy
                Comparative Anatomy
                Ichthyology
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Vertebrate Paleontology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article