3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The DsrD functional marker protein is an allosteric activator of the DsrAB dissimilatory sulfite reductase

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Metagenomic data have recently transformed our view of the role played by sulfur metabolism in anoxic environments by showing that this trait is much more widespread than previously believed. A key enzyme in sulfur metabolism is the dissimilatory sulfite reductase DsrAB that is ubiquitous in organisms with a reductive, oxidative, or disproportionating activity. However, the function of some dsr genes, such as dsrD, has so far been unknown despite its use as a functional marker to genomically assign the type of sulfur energy metabolism, sometimes with unclear results. Here, we disclose the function of DsrD as an activator of DsrAB that significantly increases its activity, providing important insights into the mechanism of this enzyme in different types of sulfur metabolism.

          Abstract

          Dissimilatory sulfur metabolism was recently shown to be much more widespread among bacteria and archaea than previously believed. One of the key pathways involved is the dsr pathway that is responsible for sulfite reduction in sulfate-, sulfur-, thiosulfate-, and sulfite-reducing organisms, sulfur disproportionators and organosulfonate degraders, or for the production of sulfite in many photo- and chemotrophic sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes. The key enzyme is DsrAB, the dissimilatory sulfite reductase, but a range of other Dsr proteins is involved, with different gene sets being present in organisms with a reductive or oxidative metabolism. The dsrD gene codes for a small protein of unknown function and has been widely used as a functional marker for reductive or disproportionating sulfur metabolism, although in some cases this has been disputed. Here, we present in vivo and in vitro studies showing that DsrD is a physiological partner of DsrAB and acts as an activator of its sulfite reduction activity. DsrD is expressed in respiratory but not in fermentative conditions and a Δ dsrD deletion strain could be obtained, indicating that its function is not essential. This strain grew less efficiently during sulfate and sulfite reduction. Organisms with the earliest forms of dsrAB lack the dsrD gene, revealing that its activating role arose later in evolution relative to dsrAB.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Harnessing homologous recombination in vitro to generate recombinant DNA via SLIC.

          We describe a new cloning method, sequence and ligation-independent cloning (SLIC), which allows the assembly of multiple DNA fragments in a single reaction using in vitro homologous recombination and single-strand annealing. SLIC mimics in vivo homologous recombination by relying on exonuclease-generated ssDNA overhangs in insert and vector fragments, and the assembly of these fragments by recombination in vitro. SLIC inserts can also be prepared by incomplete PCR (iPCR) or mixed PCR. SLIC allows efficient and reproducible assembly of recombinant DNA with as many as 5 and 10 fragments simultaneously. SLIC circumvents the sequence requirements of traditional methods and functions much more efficiently at very low DNA concentrations when combined with RecA to catalyze homologous recombination. This flexibility allows much greater versatility in the generation of recombinant DNA for the purposes of synthetic biology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic consortia.

            Multicellular assemblages of microorganisms are ubiquitous in nature, and the proximity afforded by aggregation is thought to permit intercellular metabolic coupling that can accommodate otherwise unfavourable reactions. Consortia of methane-oxidizing archaea and sulphate-reducing bacteria are a well-known environmental example of microbial co-aggregation; however, the coupling mechanisms between these paired organisms is not well understood, despite the attention given them because of the global significance of anaerobic methane oxidation. Here we examined the influence of interspecies spatial positioning as it relates to biosynthetic activity within structurally diverse uncultured methane-oxidizing consortia by measuring stable isotope incorporation for individual archaeal and bacterial cells to constrain their potential metabolic interactions. In contrast to conventional models of syntrophy based on the passage of molecular intermediates, cellular activities were found to be independent of both species intermixing and distance between syntrophic partners within consortia. A generalized model of electric conductivity between co-associated archaea and bacteria best fit the empirical data. Combined with the detection of large multi-haem cytochromes in the genomes of methanotrophic archaea and the demonstration of redox-dependent staining of the matrix between cells in consortia, these results provide evidence for syntrophic coupling through direct electron transfer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle

              A critical step in the biogeochemical cycle of sulfur on Earth is microbial sulfate reduction, yet organisms from relatively few lineages have been implicated in this process. Previous studies using functional marker genes have detected abundant, novel dissimilatory sulfite reductases (DsrAB) that could confer the capacity for microbial sulfite/sulfate reduction but were not affiliated with known organisms. Thus, the identity of a significant fraction of sulfate/sulfite-reducing microbes has remained elusive. Here we report the discovery of the capacity for sulfate/sulfite reduction in the genomes of organisms from 13 bacterial and archaeal phyla, thereby more than doubling the number of microbial phyla associated with this process. Eight of the 13 newly identified groups are candidate phyla that lack isolated representatives, a finding only possible given genomes from metagenomes. Organisms from Verrucomicrobia and two candidate phyla, Candidatus Rokubacteria and Candidatus Hydrothermarchaeota, contain some of the earliest evolved dsrAB genes. The capacity for sulfite reduction has been laterally transferred in multiple events within some phyla, and a key gene potentially capable of modulating sulfur metabolism in associated cells has been acquired by putatively symbiotic bacteria. We conclude that current functional predictions based on phylogeny significantly underestimate the extent of sulfate/sulfite reduction across Earth’s ecosystems. Understanding the prevalence of this capacity is integral to interpreting the carbon cycle because sulfate reduction is often coupled to turnover of buried organic carbon. Our findings expand the diversity of microbial groups associated with sulfur transformations in the environment and motivate revision of biogeochemical process models based on microbial community composition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                21 January 2022
                25 January 2022
                21 January 2022
                : 119
                : 4
                : e2118880119
                Affiliations
                [1] aInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal;
                [2] bDepartamento de Química, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Caparica 2829-516, Portugal
                Author notes
                2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: ipereira@ 123456itqb.unl.pt or sofiasvenceslau@ 123456gmail.com .
                 

                Edited by Bo Barker Jorgensen, Department of Biology, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus C, Denmark; received October 15, 2021; accepted December 14, 2021

                Author contributions: S.S.V. and I.A.C.P. designed research; D.F., A.C.C.B., G.P.O., T.C., and S.S.V. performed research; D.F., A.C.C.B., T.C., S.S.V., and I.A.C.P. analyzed data; and D.F., A.C.C.B., T.C., S.S.V., and I.A.C.P. wrote the paper.

                1D.F. and A.C.C.B. contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-6422
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-2927
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3782-4014
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8774-1351
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3283-4520
                Article
                202118880
                10.1073/pnas.2118880119
                8794893
                35064091
                1ee3860a-ee07-48f3-a703-09708b68b140
                Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 14 December 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                423
                Biological Sciences
                Microbiology

                sulfur metabolism,dissimilatory sulfite reductase,sulfate-reducing bacteria,sulfur disproportionation,allosteric activation

                Comments

                Comment on this article