103
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Hospital Readmission in General Medicine Patients: A Prediction Model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Previous studies of hospital readmission have focused on specific conditions or populations and generated complex prediction models.

          Objective

          To identify predictors of early hospital readmission in a diverse patient population and derive and validate a simple model for identifying patients at high readmission risk.

          Design

          Prospective observational cohort study.

          Patients

          Participants encompassed 10,946 patients discharged home from general medicine services at six academic medical centers and were randomly divided into derivation (n = 7,287) and validation (n = 3,659) cohorts.

          Measurements

          We identified readmissions from administrative data and 30-day post-discharge telephone follow-up. Patient-level factors were grouped into four categories: sociodemographic factors, social support, health condition, and healthcare utilization. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors of unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge and developed a scoring system for estimating readmission risk.

          Results

          Approximately 17.5% of patients were readmitted in each cohort. Among patients in the derivation cohort, seven factors emerged as significant predictors of early readmission: insurance status, marital status, having a regular physician, Charlson comorbidity index, SF12 physical component score, ≥1 admission(s) within the last year, and current length of stay >2 days. A cumulative risk score of ≥25 points identified 5% of patients with a readmission risk of approximately 30% in each cohort. Model discrimination was fair with a c-statistic of 0.65 and 0.61 for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.

          Conclusions

          Select patient characteristics easily available shortly after admission can be used to identify a subset of patients at elevated risk of early readmission. This information may guide the efficient use of interventions to prevent readmission.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial.

          Emergency department visits and rehospitalization are common after hospital discharge. To test the effects of an intervention designed to minimize hospital utilization after discharge. Randomized trial using block randomization of 6 and 8. Randomly arranged index cards were placed in opaque envelopes labeled consecutively with study numbers, and participants were assigned a study group by revealing the index card. General medical service at an urban, academic, safety-net hospital. 749 English-speaking hospitalized adults (mean age, 49.9 years). A nurse discharge advocate worked with patients during their hospital stay to arrange follow-up appointments, confirm medication reconciliation, and conduct patient education with an individualized instruction booklet that was sent to their primary care provider. A clinical pharmacist called patients 2 to 4 days after discharge to reinforce the discharge plan and review medications. Participants and providers were not blinded to treatment assignment. Primary outcomes were emergency department visits and hospitalizations within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes were self-reported preparedness for discharge and frequency of primary care providers' follow-up within 30 days of discharge. Research staff doing follow-up were blinded to study group assignment. Participants in the intervention group (n = 370) had a lower rate of hospital utilization than those receiving usual care (n = 368) (0.314 vs. 0.451 visit per person per month; incidence rate ratio, 0.695 [95% CI, 0.515 to 0.937]; P = 0.009). The intervention was most effective among participants with hospital utilization in the 6 months before index admission (P = 0.014). Adverse events were not assessed; these data were collected but are still being analyzed. This was a single-center study in which not all potentially eligible patients could be enrolled, and outcome assessment sometimes relied on participant report. A package of discharge services reduced hospital utilization within 30 days of discharge. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial.

            Comprehensive discharge planning by advanced practice nurses has demonstrated short-term reductions in readmissions of elderly patients, but the benefits of more intensive follow-up of hospitalized elders at risk for poor outcomes after discharge has not been studied. To examine the effectiveness of an advanced practice nurse-centered discharge planning and home follow-up intervention for elders at risk for hospital readmissions. Randomized clinical trial with follow-up at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks after index hospital discharge. Two urban, academically affiliated hospitals in Philadelphia, Pa. Eligible patients were 65 years or older, hospitalized between August 1992 and March 1996, and had 1 of several medical and surgical reasons for admission. Intervention group patients received a comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up protocol designed specifically for elders at risk for poor outcomes after discharge and implemented by advanced practice nurses. Readmissions, time to first readmission, acute care visits after discharge, costs, functional status, depression, and patient satisfaction. A total of 363 patients (186 in the control group and 177 in the intervention group) were enrolled in the study; 70% of intervention and 74% of control subjects completed the trial. Mean age of sample was 75 years; 50% were men and 45% were black. By week 24 after the index hospital discharge, control group patients were more likely than intervention group patients to be readmitted at least once (37.1 % vs 20.3 %; P<.001). Fewer intervention group patients had multiple readmissions (6.2% vs 14.5%; P = .01) and the intervention group had fewer hospital days per patient (1.53 vs 4.09 days; P<.001). Time to first readmission was increased in the intervention group (P<.001). At 24 weeks after discharge, total Medicare reimbursements for health services were about $1.2 million in the control group vs about $0.6 million in the intervention group (P<.001). There were no significant group differences in post-discharge acute care visits, functional status, depression, or patient satisfaction. An advanced practice nurse-centered discharge planning and home care intervention for at-risk hospitalized elders reduced readmissions, lengthened the time between discharge and readmission, and decreased the costs of providing health care. Thus, the intervention demonstrated great potential in promoting positive outcomes for hospitalized elders at high risk for rehospitalization while reducing costs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adverse drug events occurring following hospital discharge.

              To describe the incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs), preventable ADEs, and ameliorable ADEs occurring after hospital discharge and their associated risk factors. Prospective cohort study. Urban academic health sciences center. Consecutive patients discharged home from the general medical service. We determined posthospital outcomes approximately 24 days following discharge by performing a chart review and telephone interview. Using the telephone interview, we identified new or worsening symptoms, the patient's health system use, and recollection of processes of care. Posthospital outcomes were judged by 2 internists independently. Four hundred of 581 potentially eligible patients were evaluated. Of the 400 patients, 45 developed an ADE (incidence, 11%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 14%). Of these, 27% were preventable and 33% were ameliorable. Injuries were significant in 32 patients, serious in 6, and life threatening in 7. Patients were less likely to experience an ADE if they recalled having side effects of prescribed medications explained (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8). The risk of ADE per prescription was highest for corticosteroids, anticoagulants, antibiotics, analgesics, and cardiovascular medications. Risk increased with prescription number. Failure to monitor was an especially common cause of preventable and ameliorable ADEs. Following discharge, ADEs were common and many were preventable or ameliorable. Medication side effects should be discussed, and interventions should include better monitoring and target patients receiving specific drug classes or multiple medications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +1-617-7326201 , +1-617-7327072 , jschnipper@partners.org
                Journal
                J Gen Intern Med
                Journal of General Internal Medicine
                Springer-Verlag (New York )
                0884-8734
                1525-1497
                15 December 2009
                15 December 2009
                March 2010
                : 25
                : 3
                : 211-219
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02120-1613 USA
                [2 ]BWH Academic Hospitalist Service and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
                [3 ]Department of Medicine and Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
                [4 ]Departments of Medicine and Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto and Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
                [5 ]Iowa City VA Medical Center and the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA USA
                [6 ]University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
                [7 ]University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA
                Article
                1196
                10.1007/s11606-009-1196-1
                2839332
                20013068
                1769afd8-e399-40f5-ad8c-f83f0af1c387
                © The Author(s) 2009
                History
                : 2 June 2009
                : 4 November 2009
                : 6 November 2009
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

                Internal medicine
                predictive,readmission,model,hospital
                Internal medicine
                predictive, readmission, model, hospital

                Comments

                Comment on this article