6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      From phytoremediation of soil contaminants to phytomanagement of ecosystem services in metal contaminated sites

      1 , 2 , 1 , 1
      International Journal of Phytoremediation
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references118

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Accumulators and excluders ‐strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals

          A Baker (2008)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils.

            Technogenic activities (industrial-plastic, textiles, microelectronics, wood preservatives; mining-mine refuse, tailings, smelting; agrochemicals-chemical fertilizers, farm yard manure, pesticides; aerosols-pyrometallurgical and automobile exhausts; biosolids-sewage sludge, domestic waste; fly ash-coal combustion products) are the primary sources of heavy metal contamination and pollution in the environment in addition to geogenic sources. During the last two decades, bioremediation has emerged as a potential tool to clean up the metal-contaminated/polluted environment. Exclusively derived processes by plants alone (phytoremediation) are time-consuming. Further, high levels of pollutants pose toxicity to the remediating plants. This situation could be ameliorated and accelerated by exploring the partnership of plant-microbe, which would improve the plant growth by facilitating the sequestration of toxic heavy metals. Plants can bioconcentrate (phytoextraction) as well as bioimmobilize or inactivate (phytostabilization) toxic heavy metals through in situ rhizospheric processes. The mobility and bioavailability of heavy metal in the soil, particularly at the rhizosphere where root uptake or exclusion takes place, are critical factors that affect phytoextraction and phytostabilization. Developing new methods for either enhancing (phytoextraction) or reducing the bioavailability of metal contaminants in the rhizosphere (phytostabilization) as well as improving plant establishment, growth, and health could significantly speed up the process of bioremediation techniques. In this review, we have highlighted the role of plant growth promoting rhizo- and/or endophytic bacteria in accelerating phytoremediation derived benefits in extensive tables and elaborate schematic sketches. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                International Journal of Phytoremediation
                International Journal of Phytoremediation
                Informa UK Limited
                1522-6514
                1549-7879
                March 27 2018
                March 21 2018
                September 2017
                March 21 2018
                : 20
                : 4
                : 384-397
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Conservation of Natural Resources, NEIKER-Tecnalia, Basque Institute of Agricultural Research and Development, Soil Microbial Ecology Group, Derio, Spain
                [2 ] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, BIOFISIKA Institute (CSIC-UPV/EHU), University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
                Article
                10.1080/15226514.2017.1365340
                28862473
                174d930e-7cfe-42ec-8de4-20cc98f5ab92
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article