6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Introduction of the South African SARS-CoV-2 variant 501Y.V2 into the UK

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The current surge of COVID-19 cases across the UK is now thought to be mostly driven by a new, highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variant (B.1.1.7/ VUI-202012/01), 1 but another highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variant (B.1.351/501Y.V2) from South Africa has already been detected in the UK population [https://cov-lineages.org/global_report.html]. This South African 501Y.V2 variant is characterised by three mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein: K417N (a lysine to asparagine substitution at amino acid position 417 in the S protein), E484K (a glutamic acid to lysine substitution at amino acid position 484 in the S protein) and N501Y (an asparagine to tyrosine substitution at amino acid position 501 in the S protein). This last mutation is also present in the UK VUI-202012/01 variant. 1 This 501Y.V2 variant likely emerged from the first wave of the South African COVID-19 epidemic in the hardest hit Nelson Mandela Bay metropolitan area of the Eastern Cape Province in early October 2020, then spread quickly to become the predominant virus lineage in the Eastern and Western Cape Provinces by the end of November 2020. 2 This virus variant soon spread to neighbouring Botswana in December 2020, as well as several other countries worldwide including England, Scotland, France, Sweden, Switzerland, South Korea during December 2020, and Australia in January 2021 (Figure ). This phylogenetic reconstruction of the whole genome viral sequences suggests that there may have been up to 8-9 independent introductions of the 501Y.V2 variant into England and 2 into Scotland, though the details of the epidemiological linkage between these cases is unknown. Figure A maximum likelihood tree of South African variant B.1.351/501Y.V2 (downloaded 7 January 2020, from GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT: https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/ and manually edited using BioEdit v7.2.5. Phylogenetic tree construction was performed using FastTree v2.1.11 and displayed using FigTree v1.4.4. We gratefully acknowledge and thank all the teams and laboratories that have deposited these sequences into GISAID to make this analysis possible. Red and blue brackets denote 501Y.V2 viruses detected in England or Scotland, respectively, together with any closely related sequences from elsewhere. The larger, bold red bracket indicates a larger cluster of possibly linked viruses that are closely related to viruses from France. Note that this tree is intended to be illustrative and not comprehensive. Figure One hypothesis about the origins of this variant is through intra-host viral evolution due to prolonged infection in an immunocompromised host. 3 Indeed, in this case report, the appearance of the E484K and N501Y mutations were described after 75 and 128 days of infection, respectively. However, this cannot be the only mechanism, as multiple other mutations are present that would require contributions from other viral lineages. 2 Additional mutations in other viral genes may also be secondary mutations that may have arisen as ‘compensatory’ mutations to reduce any fitness penalty resulting from these S protein changes (K417N, E484K, N501Y). 4 Currently, the 501Y.V2 variant is considered to be a more highly transmissible strain due to the rapidity with which it became predominant in this South African population over just a few weeks. 2 There are also some real concerns that the mutations in the S protein (K417N, E484K, N501Y) may result in conformation changes that may impact on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines developed based on earlier SARS-CoV-2 strains. However a recent small study examining the impact of the N501Y mutation on the recently licensed Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine did not show any loss of antibody neutralisation efficacy, 5 though similar further studies examining the impact of this N501Y and the other mutations (K417N, E484K) on the various other COVID-19 vaccines are also required. There appears to be no indication of increased severity of illness, as yet, though research is ongoing in both the UK and South Africa to further characterise the phenotype of this South African 501Y.V2 variant. 6 Despite the presence of these two more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants, the public health messaging remains the same to reduce the spread of these viruses: to maintain social distancing, including masking in crowded indoor areas, and limit the number of contacts that we have each day. Declaration of Competing Interest None

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Persistence and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in an Immunocompromised Host

          To the Editor: A 45-year-old man with severe antiphospholipid syndrome complicated by diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, 1 who was receiving anticoagulation therapy, glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, and intermittent rituximab and eculizumab, was admitted to the hospital with fever (Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). On day 0, Covid-19 was diagnosed by SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay of a nasopharyngeal swab specimen, and the patient received a 5-day course of remdesivir (Fig. S2). Glucocorticoid doses were increased because of suspected diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. He was discharged on day 5 without a need for supplemental oxygen. From day 6 through day 68, the patient quarantined alone at home, but during the quarantine period, he was hospitalized three times for abdominal pain and once for fatigue and dyspnea. The admissions were complicated by hypoxemia that caused concern for recurrent diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and was treated with increased doses of glucocorticoids. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values increased to 37.8 on day 39, which suggested resolving infection (Table S1). 2,3 On day 72 (4 days into another hospital admission for hypoxemia), RT-PCR assay of a nasopharyngeal swab was positive, with a Ct value of 27.6, causing concern for a recurrence of Covid-19. The patient again received remdesivir (a 10-day course), and subsequent RT-PCR assays were negative. On day 105, the patient was admitted for cellulitis. On day 111, hypoxemia developed, ultimately requiring treatment with high-flow oxygen. Given the concern for recurrent diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, the patient’s immunosuppression was escalated (Figs. S1 through S3). On day 128, the RT-PCR Ct value was 32.7, which caused concern for a second Covid-19 recurrence, and the patient was given another 5-day course of remdesivir. A subsequent RT-PCR assay was negative. Given continued respiratory decline and concern for ongoing diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, the patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin, intravenous cyclophosphamide, and daily ruxolitinib, in addition to glucocorticoids. On day 143, the RT-PCR Ct value was 15.6, which caused concern for a third recurrence of Covid-19. The patient received a SARS-CoV-2 antibody cocktail against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Regeneron). 4 On day 150, he underwent endotracheal intubation because of hypoxemia. A bronchoalveolar-lavage specimen on day 151 revealed an RT-PCR Ct value of 15.8 and grew Aspergillus fumigatus. The patient received remdesivir and antifungal agents. On day 154, he died from shock and respiratory failure. We performed quantitative SARS-CoV-2 viral load assays in respiratory samples (nasopharyngeal and sputum) and in plasma, and the results were concordant with RT-PCR Ct values, peaking at 8.9 log10 copies per milliliter (Fig. S2 and Table S1). Tissue studies showed the highest SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in the lungs and spleen (Figs. S4 and S5). Phylogenetic analysis was consistent with persistent infection and accelerated viral evolution (Figures 1A and S6). Amino acid changes were predominantly in the spike gene and the receptor-binding domain, which make up 13% and 2% of the viral genome, respectively, but harbored 57% and 38% of the observed changes (Figure 1B). Viral infectivity studies confirmed infectious virus in nasopharyngeal samples from days 75 and 143 (Fig. S7). Immunophenotyping and SARS-CoV-2–specific B-cell and T-cell responses are shown in Table S2 and Figures S8 through S11. Although most immunocompromised persons effectively clear SARS-CoV-2 infection, this case highlights the potential for persistent infection 5 and accelerated viral evolution associated with an immunocompromised state.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Emergence and rapid spread of a new severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) lineage with multiple spike mutations in South Africa

            Continued uncontrolled transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in many parts of the world is creating the conditions for significant virus evolution. Here, we describe a new SARS-CoV-2 lineage (501Y.V2) characterised by eight lineage-defining mutations in the spike protein, including three at important residues in the receptor-binding domain (K417N, E484K and N501Y) that may have functional significance. This lineage emerged in South Africa after the first epidemic wave in a severely affected metropolitan area, Nelson Mandela Bay, located on the coast of the Eastern Cape Province. This lineage spread rapidly, becoming within weeks the dominant lineage in the Eastern Cape and Western Cape Provinces. Whilst the full significance of the mutations is yet to be determined, the genomic data, showing the rapid displacement of other lineages, suggest that this lineage may be associated with increased transmissibility.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Emergence of a new SARS-CoV-2 variant in the UK

              An earlier article described how new SARS-CoV-2 synonymous nucleotide mutations (which had no impact on the amino acid coding) may have arisen with its move into the human population, but reported no ‘beneficial’ mutations. 1 Subsequent to this, Korber et al. 2 reported on the spread of a SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein mutation, D614G (i.e. an aspartic acid to glycine amino acid substitution at position 614 in the viral S gene) across multiple countries, suggesting that it was a more ‘transmissible’ form of the virus. This was based on higher viral loads found during in vitro replication studies, as well as in clinical samples containing this mutation and animal studies suggesting this. 3 However, others cautioned this interpretation, stating that ‘founder’ effects could not be entirely ruled out to explain the ubiquity of this virus in the global population, 4 and other teams did not find evidence of enhanced transmission of the D614G strain when analysing the frequency of recurrent mutations. 5 Since then a new, rapidly spreading variant in the UK (‘VUI-202012/01′ i.e. ‘variant under investigation’) has been reported in the UK in recent weeks. 6 , 7 This variant is derived from the SARS-CoV-2 20B/GR clade (lineage B.1.1.7) and contains multiple mutations, including a combination of the N501Y (i.e. an asparagine to tyrosine amino acid substitution at position 501 in the viral S gene) and the 69–70del (i.e. a deletion of 6 bases coding for histidine and valine at positions 69 and 70, respectively, in the viral S gene) mutations, both of which have been circulating, separately and independently, globally for many months previously. 8 , 9 Fig. 1 shows an illustrative maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of selected SARS-CoV-2 full genome sequences, highlighting the diversity and timeline of globally circulating strains containing the N501Y (red) and 69–70del (green) mutations that have been existing separately and independently prior to the emergence of the new B.1.1.7 (variant) (pink), after August 2020, that contains both of these characteristic mutations. Note that some of the earliest N501Y-containing viruses originated from Brazil (April 2020) and Australia (June-July 2020), and as early as March 2020 from Slovenia for the 69–70del mutation, though we know that this 69–70del mutant was circulating as early as January in Thailand and February in Germany. 9 Most of the sequences containing both of these mutations (pink) are from the UK during October-November 2020, though there is at least one sequence from Denmark from November 2020. Fig. 1 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of selected SARS-CoV-2 full genome sequences rooted against the original Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 reference strain (NC_045512_Wuhan_Hu_1, blue), highlighting the diversity and timeline of globally circulating strains containing the N501Y (red) and 69–70del (green) mutations that have been existing separately and independently prior to the emergence of the new B.1.1.7 (variant) (pink), after August 2020, that contains both of these characteristic mutations. All sequences were downloaded from GISAID (https://www.gisaid.org/) and were aligned using BioEdit v.7.2.5., the tree was constructed using FastTree v.2.1.11 and displayed in FigTree v.1.4.4. We gratefully acknowledge and thank the various laboratories and contributors of these GISAID for providing these SARS-CoV-2 sequences. Note that this tree is illustrative and not intended to be comprehensive. Fig. 1 Early investigations from the UK suggest an increased transmissibility of up to 71% over and above the previous circulating strains of SARS-CoV-2, which may contribute 0.39–0.93 to the R0 value estimates of the virus, and ongoing monitoring of the situation is in progress. 6 However, so far there is no evidence that this new B.1.1.7 (variant) demonstrates any increased clinical severity of illness, or vaccine escape capability. The fact that these mutations have been reported since October before the surge in test positivity noted in the Southeast of England also raises the question as to whether this is also a founder effect. The practical risk of a more rapidly spreading virus is the potential impact on healthcare services especially if seasonal influenza were to return. If more people are infected over a similar time period compared to other virus strains, potentially more patients may need hospitalisation, with a danger that healthcare services may be overwhelmed. A more rapidly spreading virus will also accelerate the need to reach the COVID-19-vulnerable populations (the elderly and those with multiple comorbidities) with the new COVID-19 vaccines to stay ‘ahead’ of the virus. At the same time, deferring elective surgeries or resources for other illnesses may have unintended consequences if the rapidly spreading virus does not behave as predicted. At the time of writing, further investigations are ongoing of this virus to determine more clearly its impact on society and healthcare capacity. In addition, the impact of the mutation on the effectiveness of vaccines or prior immunity are being explored. Another intriguing question is whether the mutation has arisen from an immunocompromised host, 10 or through an animal source such as mink. 7 Many countries have decided to close the borders to visitors from the UK even though the impact of the new B.1.1.7 (variant) is not fully known. It is critical to have updated and transparent information from across the world to answer these questions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Infect
                J Infect
                The Journal of Infection
                Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.
                0163-4453
                1532-2742
                17 January 2021
                17 January 2021
                Affiliations
                [a ]Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
                [b ]Clinical Microbiology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
                [c ]Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Dr. Julian W. Tang, 5/F Sandringham Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
                Article
                S0163-4453(21)00030-X
                10.1016/j.jinf.2021.01.007
                7813514
                33472093
                169cfe75-f392-408e-93e8-f77a6fe6b8a8
                © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The British Infection Association.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 13 January 2021
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article