0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mutual Occurrence Ratio of Planets. I. New Clues to Reveal Origins of Hot- and Warm-Jupiter from the RV Sample

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many studies have analyzed planetary occurrence rates and their dependence on the host's properties to provide clues to planet formation, but few have focused on the mutual occurrence ratio of different kinds of planets. Such relations reveal whether and how one type of planet evolves into another, e.g. from a cold Jupiter to a warm or even hot Jupiter, and demonstrate how stellar properties impact the evolution history of planetary systems. We propose a new classification of giant planets, i.e. cold Jupiter(CJ), warm Jupiter(WJ), and hot Jupiter(HJ), according to their position relative to the snow line in the system. Then, we derive their occurrence rates(\({\eta}_{\rm HJ}\), \({\eta}_{\rm WJ}\), \({\eta}_{\rm CJ}\)) with the detection completeness of RV(Radial Velocity) surveys(HARPS\(\&\) CORALIE) considered. Finally, we analyze the correlation between the mutual occurrence ratios, i.e. \({\eta}{_{\rm CJ}} / {\eta}_{\rm WJ}\), \({\eta}{_{\rm CJ}} / {\eta}_{\rm HJ}\) or \({\eta}{_{\rm WJ}}/{\eta}_{\rm HJ}\), and various stellar properties, e.g. effective temperature \(T_{\rm eff}\). Our results show that the \({\eta}_{\rm HJ}\), \({\eta}_{\rm WJ}\) and \({\eta}_{\rm CJ}\) are increasing with the increasing \(T_{\rm eff}\) when \(T_{\rm eff}\in (4600,6600] K\). Furthermore, the mutual occurrence ratio between CJ and WJ, i.e. \({\eta}{_{\rm CJ}} /{\eta}_{\rm WJ}\), shows a decreasing trend with the increasing \(T_{\rm eff}\). But, both \({\eta}{_{\rm CJ}}/{\eta}_{\rm HJ}\) and \({\eta}{_{\rm WJ}}/{\eta}_{\rm HJ}\) are increasing when the \(T_{\rm eff}\) increases. Further consistency tests reveal that the formation processes of WJ and HJ may be dominated by orbital change mechanisms rather than the in-situ model. However, unlike WJ, which favors gentle disk migration, HJ favors a more violent mechanism that requires further investigation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          16 April 2024
          Article
          10.1093/mnras/stae733
          2404.11005
          15c6b2ea-a60f-4185-8bbd-579bb3c73848

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          2024MNRAS.529.3958S
          14 pages, 11 figures,accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
          astro-ph.EP

          Planetary astrophysics
          Planetary astrophysics

          Comments

          Comment on this article