5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Understanding integrated HPV testing and treatment of pre-cancerous cervical cancer in Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Guatemala and Philippines: study protocol

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Many low- and-middle-income countries are disproportionately burdened by cervical cancer, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. HPV-DNA testing coupled with treatment with thermal ablation is a recommended screening and precancer treatment strategy, but not enough is known about how this can be effectively implemented in the context of integrated services. The (Scale Up Cervical Cancer Elimination by Secondary prevention Strategy, (SUCCESS) project is conducting a study to understand this approach, integrated into existing women’s health services in Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Guatemala, and the Philippines (2020–2024).

          Methods

          A hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III mixed-methods observational study design is used to assess feasibility, acceptability, and costs of integrated service delivery in 10 sites per country, selected considering urban/rural location, facility level, onsite/offsite laboratories, and health services type. In each country, a sample size of 2227 women aged 25–49 years will be enrolled with about 20% being women living with HIV. The primary outcome is proportion of HPV positive women completing precancer treatment, if eligible, within three months of screening. Data collection and analysis includes; facility and client exit surveys, key informant and client interviews, registries and project records extractions, and costing data analysis. Analysis includes descriptive statistics, context description, thematic analysis, and document analysis. Quantitative analyses will be stratified by participant’s HIV status.

          Discussion

          Recruitment of study participants started in April 2022 (Burkina Faso and Côte d’Ivoire) and August 2022 (Guatemala and the Philippines). Enrolment targets for women screened, client exit, in-depth and key informant interviews conducted were reached in Burkina Faso and Cote d’Ivoire in November 2022. Guatemala and Philippines are expected to complete enrolment by June 2023. Follow-up of study Participants 12-months post-treatment is ongoing and is expected to be completed for all countries by August 2024. In LMICs, integrating cervical cancer secondary prevention services into other health services will likely require specific rather than incidental recruitment of women for screening. Reconfiguration of laboratory infrastructure and planning for sample management must be made well in advance to meet induced demand for screening.

          Trail Registration ClinicalTrials.Gov ID: NCT05133661 (24/11/2021).

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-023-01696-8.

          Abstract

          Low- and middle-income countries bear a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer deaths and suffering from a disease that is preventable and treatable. Unitaid is funding and working collaboratively with the governments of Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Guatemala, and the Philippines to implement Scale Up Cervical Cancer Elimination with Secondary prevention Strategy (SUCCESS) project. Significant advancements on cervical cancer management have been made in last four decades. However, the optimal approaches to translating available evidence into actionable screening and treatment implementation strategies in the context of mass-screening programmes is uncertain. SUCCESS project aims to generate evidence on how to deliver cervical cancer services in a way that promotes human papilloma virus (HPV) screening using newer diagnostic and treatment technologies available. This mixed methods study aims to contribute to the evidence on how HPV testing and treatment can be done in manner that is acceptable and feasible in the context of integrated service delivery. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected over a period of 24 months (2022–2024) across the four countries. In each country, 2227 women aged 25–49 years will be enrolled and screened for HPV, with 20% of them being women living with HIV. In this study, HPV positive will be retested 12-months after initial screening and/or treatment. The findings of the study will add to the body of literature especially from low- and middle-income countries how to implement promising strategies for scaling up cervical cancer screening and treatment coverage.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-023-01696-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

          An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of “implementation outcomes” distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working “taxonomy” of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes—acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability—along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.

            This study proposes methods for blending design components of clinical effectiveness and implementation research. Such blending can provide benefits over pursuing these lines of research independently; for example, more rapid translational gains, more effective implementation strategies, and more useful information for decision makers. This study proposes a "hybrid effectiveness-implementation" typology, describes a rationale for their use, outlines the design decisions that must be faced, and provides several real-world examples. An effectiveness-implementation hybrid design is one that takes a dual focus a priori in assessing clinical effectiveness and implementation. We propose 3 hybrid types: (1) testing effects of a clinical intervention on relevant outcomes while observing and gathering information on implementation; (2) dual testing of clinical and implementation interventions/strategies; and (3) testing of an implementation strategy while observing and gathering information on the clinical intervention's impact on relevant outcomes. The hybrid typology proposed herein must be considered a construct still in evolution. Although traditional clinical effectiveness and implementation trials are likely to remain the most common approach to moving a clinical intervention through from efficacy research to public health impact, judicious use of the proposed hybrid designs could speed the translation of research findings into routine practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening.

              Several studies suggest that HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology in primary cervical screening. These studies had different designs and were reported in different ways. Individual patient data were collected for all European and North American studies in which cytology was routinely performed and HPV testing was included as an additional parallel test. More than 60,000 women were included. The sensitivity and specificity of HPV testing were compared with routine cytology, both overall and for ages <35, 35-49 and 50+. The age-specific prevalence of high risk HPV (hr-HPV) was also analysed. HPV testing was substantially more sensitive in detecting CIN2+ than cytology (96.1% vs. 53.0%) but less specific (90.7% vs. 96.3%). The sensitivity of HPV testing was similar in all studies carried out in different areas of Europe and North America, whereas the sensitivity of cytology was highly variable. HPV sensitivity was uniformly high at all ages, whereas the sensitivity of cytology was substantially better in women over the age of 50 than in younger women (79.3% vs. 59.6%). The specificity of both tests increased with age. Positivity rates for HPV testing in women without high-grade CIN were region dependent. These results support the use of HPV testing as the sole primary screening test, with cytology reserved for women who test HPV positive. Large demonstration projects are needed to fully evaluate this strategy. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Mark.Kabue@Jhpiego.org
                Journal
                Reprod Health
                Reprod Health
                Reproductive Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1742-4755
                13 November 2023
                13 November 2023
                2023
                : 20
                : 167
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Jhpiego, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [2 ]The Hospital for Sick Children, Research Institute, ( https://ror.org/057q4rt57) Toronto, Canada
                [3 ]Expertise France, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
                [4 ]Jhpiego, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
                [5 ]Jhpiego, Guatemala City, Guatemala
                [6 ]Jhpiego, Manila, Philippines
                [7 ]Jhpiego, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
                [8 ]Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, ( https://ror.org/00za53h95) Baltimore, MD USA
                Article
                1696
                10.1186/s12978-023-01696-8
                10644460
                37957689
                15c60190-a045-4ab7-b197-ec255dc01a5a
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 April 2023
                : 9 October 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Unitaid
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                human papilloma virus,cervical cancer,hiv,low-and-middle-income countries,thermal ablation,burkina faso,cote d’ivoire,guatemala,philippines

                Comments

                Comment on this article