14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Substitutions L50F, E166A, and L167F in SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro Are Selected by a Protease Inhibitor In Vitro and Confer Resistance To Nirmatrelvir

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (3CLpro) has an indispensable role in the viral life cycle and is a therapeutic target for the treatment of COVID-19. The potential of 3CLpro-inhibitors to select for drug-resistant variants needs to be established. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 was passaged in vitro in the presence of increasing concentrations of ALG-097161, a probe compound designed in the context of a 3CLpro drug discovery program. We identified a combination of amino acid substitutions in 3CLpro (L50F E166A L167F) that is associated with a >20× increase in 50% effective concentration (EC 50) values for ALG-097161, nirmatrelvir (PF-07321332), PF-00835231, and ensitrelvir. While two of the single substitutions (E166A and L167F) provide low-level resistance to the inhibitors in a biochemical assay, the triple mutant results in the highest levels of resistance (6× to 72×). All substitutions are associated with a significant loss of enzymatic 3CLpro activity, suggesting a reduction in viral fitness. Structural biology analysis indicates that the different substitutions reduce the number of inhibitor/enzyme interactions while the binding of the substrate is maintained. These observations will be important for the interpretation of resistance development to 3CLpro inhibitors in the clinical setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19

          Background Nirmatrelvir is an orally administered severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 main protease (M pro ) inhibitor with potent pan–human-coronavirus activity in vitro. Methods We conducted a phase 2–3 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in which symptomatic, unvaccinated, nonhospitalized adults at high risk for progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 300 mg of nirmatrelvir plus 100 mg of ritonavir (a pharmacokinetic enhancer) or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days. Covid-19–related hospitalization or death from any cause through day 28, viral load, and safety were evaluated. Results A total of 2246 patients underwent randomization; 1120 patients received nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (nirmatrelvir group) and 1126 received placebo (placebo group). In the planned interim analysis of patients treated within 3 days after symptom onset (modified intention-to treat population, comprising 774 of the 1361 patients in the full analysis population), the incidence of Covid-19–related hospitalization or death by day 28 was lower in the nirmatrelvir group than in the placebo group by 6.32 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], −9.04 to −3.59; P<0.001; relative risk reduction, 89.1%); the incidence was 0.77% (3 of 389 patients) in the nirmatrelvir group, with 0 deaths, as compared with 7.01% (27 of 385 patients) in the placebo group, with 7 deaths. Efficacy was maintained in the final analysis involving the 1379 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population, with a difference of −5.81 percentage points (95% CI, −7.78 to −3.84; P<0.001; relative risk reduction, 88.9%). All 13 deaths occurred in the placebo group. The viral load was lower with nirmaltrelvir plus ritonavir than with placebo at day 5 of treatment, with an adjusted mean difference of −0.868 log 10 copies per milliliter when treatment was initiated within 3 days after the onset of symptoms. The incidence of adverse events that emerged during the treatment period was similar in the two groups (any adverse event, 22.6% with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir vs. 23.9% with placebo; serious adverse events, 1.6% vs. 6.6%; and adverse events leading to discontinuation of the drugs or placebo, 2.1% vs. 4.2%). Dysgeusia (5.6% vs. 0.3%) and diarrhea (3.1% vs. 1.6%) occurred more frequently with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir than with placebo. Conclusions Treatment of symptomatic Covid-19 with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir resulted in a risk of progression to severe Covid-19 that was 89% lower than the risk with placebo, without evident safety concerns. (Supported by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04960202 .)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An oral SARS-CoV-2 M pro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19

            [Figure: see text].
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The SARS-CoV-2 main protease as drug target

              Graphical abstract
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                mBio
                mBio
                mbio
                mBio
                American Society for Microbiology (1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC )
                2150-7511
                10 January 2023
                Jan-Feb 2023
                10 January 2023
                : 14
                : 1
                : e02815-22
                Affiliations
                [a ] KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Transplantation, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Virology & Chemotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
                [b ] Aligos Therapeutics, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
                [c ] CISTIM Leuven vzw, Leuven, Belgium
                [d ] KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Transplantation, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Clinical & Epidemiological Virology, Leuven, Belgium
                [e ] Institute of Virology and Immunology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
                [f ] Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathobiology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
                [g ] Aligos Belgium BV, Leuven, Belgium
                [h ] Centre for Drug Design and Discovery (CD3), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [i ] Global Virus Network (GVN), Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
                Author notes

                Jerome Deval and Koen Vandyck shared last authorship. Author order was determined alphabetically.

                The authors declare a conflict of interest. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Koen Vandyck and Pierre Raboisson are employees of Aligos Belgium BV. Cheng Liu, Antitsa Stoycheva, Sarah K Stevens, Chloe De Vita, Andreas Jekle, Lawrence M Blatt, Leonid Beigelman, Julian A Symons and Jerome Deval are employees of Aligos Therapeutics, Inc. A patent application on ALG-097161 is pending.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9265-6028
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-4356
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4571-5232
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-7514
                Article
                02815-22 mbio.02815-22
                10.1128/mbio.02815-22
                9973015
                36625640
                152c442f-d9a6-4a2e-91ed-b8608b354258
                Copyright © 2023 Jochmans et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

                History
                : 7 October 2022
                : 6 December 2022
                Page count
                supplementary-material: 4, Figures: 6, Tables: 5, Equations: 2, References: 39, Pages: 15, Words: 9474
                Categories
                Research Article
                antimicrobial-chemotherapy, Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
                Custom metadata
                January/February 2023

                Life sciences
                antiviral agents,coronavirus,drug resistance mechanisms,protease inhibitors
                Life sciences
                antiviral agents, coronavirus, drug resistance mechanisms, protease inhibitors

                Comments

                Comment on this article