There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
To the Editor
Online virtual consultation setting enables real-time exchange between two or more
participants at different locations via audio and video communication [1-9]. In terms
of the visualization of the discussion partners, telemedicine thus differs from a
classic telephone conference and expands it to include the visual component [1-6].
The term telemedicine system refers to the technological setup or infrastructure behind
such a telemedicine meeting, the telemedicine technology [1-7]. This refers to the
hardware and software components that are required to carry out telemedicine technically
[2]. The good news is that all these conference quirks no longer come into play in
corona-conditioned video and telephone conferences [6-10]. There simply is not time
for them anymore. Those who use telemedicine need the highest level of discipline.
Telemedicine conferences have to be better prepared mentally, as they run in a more
moderated, concentrated and focused manner. As a result, many employees who were previously
rather critical of conferences are now getting to know a completely new form of treating
children: faster, more productive, and more efficient. Added to this are the advantages
that no one had to drive to the office for this (i.e., more environmentally friendly)
and thus also saved the time that the commute would have taken [7-10].
Online consultation setting and questionnaire is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Online Consultation Setting and Questionnaire
Telemedicine virtual setting
Telemedicine setting will be established by iphone face time setting or other telemedicine
services.
Questionnaire
1) Age of child, problem the child attends the doctor (anamnesis includes fever,
condition of the child, rash, time the problem started), exact fever analysis, two-time
fever measurement.
2) Clinical examination: starting from head to feet:
a) Head: color face; lymph nodes, eyes, ears, mouth, and neck.
b) Thorax: excursions, breathing, jugular withdrawals (obstructive?), distance
belt, support of the auxiliary respiratory muscles (heart auscultation not possible
but ECG and analysis of ECG with telemedicine).
c) Abdomen: assistant examines the abdominal four quadrants by control of the
doctor in telemedicine, examination of umbilicus to diagnose umbilical hernia or inguinal
hernia (hernial sac).
d) Check genitals: testicles inside the scrotum, redding of the scrotum, blue
dot sign, hydrocele, inguinal hernia.
3) Therapy: prescribed medications by telemedicine; nurse provides prescription
in the ambulatory center; parents/patients go to pharmacy.
ECG: electrocardiography.
In conclusion, telemedicine in pediatrics plays a more important role since corona
pandemic [5-10]. In virtual telemedicine, you can urgently react to any pediatric
problem and telemedicine is time saving, especially in pediatric accidents. Compared
to adults, parents are very happy about urgent information what to do, where to go
and how is the next step to handle their child. To date, we use telemedicine to see,
diagnose and treat the child in an ambulatory setting. In Germany, ambulatory pediatric
management is fixed on 3 months terms (quarter treatment). In 1,400 pediatric patients
in the last 3 months, we performed 400 telemedicine consultations (29%). In general,
it is necessary that the pediatrician is well educated and has much experience in
children medical care. Due to this routine, the pediatrician can evaluate the condition,
fever, a rash and other features of the child and can make recommendations to the
parents in a calm manner, without any hurry. The only difficult examination is the
heart auscultation. When you perform highest quality in video conference in a child,
you need a nurse, who has much experience, too. Telemedicine is a new tool to diagnose
and treat children in an ambulatory pediatric setting to allow the pediatrician to
work more flexible, especially in staff shortage situations and high patient volume.
Background It is unclear whether asthma may affect susceptibility or severity of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children and how pediatric asthma services worldwide have responded to the pandemic. Objective To describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric asthma services and on disease burden in their patients. Methods An online survey was sent to members of the Pediatric Asthma in Real Life (PeARL) think-tank and the World Allergy Organization Pediatric Asthma Committee. It included questions on service provision, disease burden and on the clinical course of confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection among children with asthma. Results Ninety-one respondents, caring for an estimated population of >133,000 children with asthma, completed the survey. COVID-19 significantly impacted pediatric asthma services: 39% ceased physical appointments, 47% stopped accepting new patients, 75% limited patients visits. Consultations were almost halved to a median of 20 (IQR: 10-25) patients per week. Virtual clinics and helplines were launched in most centers. Better than expected disease control was reported in 20% (10-40%) of patients, while control was negatively affected in only 10% (7.5-12.5%). Adherence also appeared to increase. Only 15 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were reported among the population; the estimated incidence is not apparently different from the reports of general pediatric cohorts. Conclusion Children with asthma do not appear to be disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Outcomes may even have improved, possibly through increased adherence and/or reduced exposures. Clinical services have rapidly responded to the pandemic by limiting and replacing physical appointments with virtual encounters.
Background Telehealth, the delivery of health care through telecommunication technology, has potential to address multiple health system concerns. Despite this potential, only 15% of pediatric primary care clinicians reported using telemedicine as of 2016, with the majority identifying inadequate payment for these services as the largest barrier to their adoption. The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid changes in payment and regulations surrounding telehealth, enabling its integration into primary care pediatrics. Objective Due to limited use of telemedicine in primary care pediatrics prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, much is unknown about the role of telemedicine in pediatric primary care. To address this gap in knowledge, we examined the association between practice-level telemedicine use within a large pediatric primary care network and practice characteristics, telemedicine visit diagnoses, in-person visit volumes, child-level variations in telemedicine use, and clinician attitudes toward telemedicine. Methods We analyzed electronic health record data from 45 primary care practices and administered a clinician survey to practice clinicians. Practices were stratified into tertiles based on rates of telemedicine use (low, intermediate, high) per 1000 patients per week during a two-week period (April 19 to May 2, 2020). By practice tertile, we compared (1) practice characteristics, (2) telemedicine visit diagnoses, (3) rates of in-person visits to the office, urgent care, and the emergency department, (4) child-level variation in telemedicine use, and (5) clinician attitudes toward telemedicine across these practices. Results Across pediatric primary care practices, telemedicine visit rates ranged from 5 to 23 telemedicine visits per 1000 patients per week. Across all tertiles, the most frequent telemedicine visit diagnoses were mental health (28%-36% of visits) and dermatologic (15%-28%). Compared to low telemedicine use practices, high telemedicine use practices had fewer in-person office visits (10 vs 16 visits per 1000 patients per week, P=.005) but more total encounters overall (in-office and telemedicine: 28 vs 22 visits per 1000 patients per week, P=.006). Telemedicine use varied with child age, race and ethnicity, and recent preventive care; however, no significant interactions existed between these characteristics and practice-level telemedicine use. Finally, clinician attitudes regarding the usability and impact of telemedicine did not vary significantly across tertiles. Conclusions Across a network of pediatric practices, we identified significant practice-level variation in telemedicine use, with increased use associated with more varied telemedicine diagnoses, fewer in-person office visits, and increased overall primary care encounter volume. Thus, in the context of the pandemic, when underutilization of primary care was prevalent, higher practice-level telemedicine use supported pediatric primary care encounter volume closer to usual rates. Child-level telemedicine use differed by child age, race and ethnicity, and recent preventive care, building upon prior concerns about differences in access to telemedicine. However, increased practice-level use of telemedicine services was not associated with reduced or increased differences in use, suggesting that further work is needed to promote equitable access to primary care telemedicine.
[a
]Ped Mind Institute (PMI), Medical and Finance Center Epe, Gronau, Germany
Author notes
[b
]Corresponding Author: Stefan Bittmann, Ped Mind Institute (PMI), Medical and Finance
Center Epe, Gronau, Germany. Email:
stefanbittmann@
123456gmx.de
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial
4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.