17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      On the Epistemological Similarities of Market Liberalism and Standpoint Theory

      ,
      Episteme
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this paper, we draw attention to the epistemological assumptions of market liberalism and standpoint theory and argue that they have more in common than previously thought. We show that both traditions draw on a similar epistemological bedrock, specifically relating to the fragmentation of knowledge in society and the fact that some of this knowledge cannot easily be shared between agents. We go on to investigate how market liberals and standpoint theorists argue with recourse to these similar foundations, and sometimes diverge, primarily because of normative pre-commitments. One conclusion we draw from this is that these similarities suggest that market liberals ought to, by their own epistemological lights, be more attentive towards various problems raised by feminist standpoint theorists, and feminist standpoint theorists ought to be more open to various claims made by market liberals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references128

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Epistemic Injustice

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Use of Knowledge

              (1936)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Episteme
                Episteme
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1742-3600
                1750-0117
                May 10 2021
                : 1-21
                Article
                10.1017/epi.2021.13
                1441c969-b413-4779-97a4-84e19cb2c838
                © 2021

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content155

                Most referenced authors684