9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Inter-relationship between cognitive performance and depressive symptoms and their association with quality of life in older adults: A network analysis based on the 2017–2018 wave of Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS)

      , , , , , , ,
      Journal of Affective Disorders
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

          L Radloff (1977)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Dementia prevention, intervention, and care

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper

              The usage of psychological networks that conceptualize behavior as a complex interplay of psychological and other components has gained increasing popularity in various research fields. While prior publications have tackled the topics of estimating and interpreting such networks, little work has been conducted to check how accurate (i.e., prone to sampling variation) networks are estimated, and how stable (i.e., interpretation remains similar with less observations) inferences from the network structure (such as centrality indices) are. In this tutorial paper, we aim to introduce the reader to this field and tackle the problem of accuracy under sampling variation. We first introduce the current state-of-the-art of network estimation. Second, we provide a rationale why researchers should investigate the accuracy of psychological networks. Third, we describe how bootstrap routines can be used to (A) assess the accuracy of estimated network connections, (B) investigate the stability of centrality indices, and (C) test whether network connections and centrality estimates for different variables differ from each other. We introduce two novel statistical methods: for (B) the correlation stability coefficient, and for (C) the bootstrapped difference test for edge-weights and centrality indices. We conducted and present simulation studies to assess the performance of both methods. Finally, we developed the free R-package bootnet that allows for estimating psychological networks in a generalized framework in addition to the proposed bootstrap methods. We showcase bootnet in a tutorial, accompanied by R syntax, in which we analyze a dataset of 359 women with posttraumatic stress disorder available online. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Affective Disorders
                Journal of Affective Disorders
                Elsevier BV
                01650327
                January 2023
                January 2023
                : 320
                : 621-627
                Article
                10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.159
                36206885
                143ce8e2-56e9-42ba-b6c3-9d418485daab
                © 2023

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article