6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of nurses’ knowledge and practice of pressure injuries prevention for critically ill patients in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pressure injuries are costly and can lead to mortality and psychosocial consequences if not managed effectively. Proper management of pressure injuries is crucial for quality nursing care. However, there is limited research on nurses’ knowledge and practices in preventing and managing pressure injuries among critically ill patients in Rwanda. In addition, barriers affecting nurses’ practices in this area also need further investigation in order to inform the interventions to improve nursing care of patients with pressure injuries in Rwandan hospitals.

          Methodology

          A cross-sectional study involving 129 health nurses was conducted to determine their knowledge and practice levels regarding the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients, and barriers impeding practice in this area. The research modified the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test to evaluate the knowledge of nurses concerning the prevention of pressure injuries. A 33-item instrument drawn from pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention toolkits established by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was used to assess nurses’ practices. Additionally, barriers influencing nurses’ knowledge and practices related to the prevention of pressure injuries were evaluated through questions derived from a comparable study conducted in Ethiopia. Descriptive statistics were computed for each variable. Mean scores were computed to categorize nurses’ level of knowledge and practice. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the influence of sociodemographic factors and training on the nurses’ knowledge and practice, with a statistical significance set at a p-value less than 0.05.

          Results

          The study found that 40.0% of nurses had inadequate knowledge towards pressure injury prevention, and 60.0% reported that they inadequately practiced pressure injury prevention among critically ill patients. Nurses who have not been trained in pressure injury prevention have a 52.4% reduction in the odd of having adequate practice compared to those who have been trained (OR 0.476; 95% CI 0.211–0.996). Heavy workload, inadequate staff, shortage of equipments, presence of other priorities than pressure injury prevention, inadequate training coverage of pressure injury prevention were the most prevalent barriers reported.

          Conclusion

          The evaluation of nurses’ knowledge and practices on pressure injury prevention in critically ill patients at the study setting found that while nurses have satisfactory knowledge, their practical application is lacking due to factors like high workloads and insufficient staffing. The study recommends caution in interpreting the results due to a limited sample size, suggesting further research to guide improvements in nursing practices.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-025-02754-1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in hospitalised adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Risk factors for pressure injuries among critical care patients: A systematic review

            Objective To identify risk factors independently predictive of pressure injury (also known as pressure ulcer) development among critical-care patients Design We undertook a systematic review of primary research based on standardized criteria set forth by the Institute of Medicine. Data Sources We searched the following databases: CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Library (Wilson), Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest), PubMed (National Library of Medicine), and Scopus. There was no language restriction. Method A research librarian coordinated the search strategy. Articles that potentially met inclusion criteria were screened by two investigators. Among the articles that met selection criteria, one investigator extracted data and a second investigator reviewed the data for accuracy. Based on a literature search, we developed a tool for assessing study quality using a combination of currently available tools and expert input. We used the method developed by Coleman and colleagues in 2014 to generate evidence tables and a summary narrative synthesis by domain and subdomain. Results Of 1753 abstracts reviewed, 158 were identified as potentially eligible and 18 fulfilled eligibility criteria. Five studies were classified as high quality, two were moderate quality, nine were low quality, and two were of very low quality. Age, mobility/activity, perfusion, and vasopressor infusion emerged as important risk factors for pressure injury development, whereas results for risk categories that are theoretically important, including nutrition, and skin/pressure injury status, were mixed. Methodological limitations across studies limited the generalizability of the results, and future research is needed, particularly to evaluate risk conferred by altered nutrition and skin/pressure injury status, and to further elucidate the effects of perfusion-related variables. Conclusions Results underscore the importance of avoiding overinterpretation of a single study, and the importance of taking study quality into consideration when reviewing risk factors. Maximal pressure injury prevention efforts are particularly important among critical-care patients who are older, have altered mobility, experience poor perfusion, or who are receiving a vasopressor infusion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Knowledge and practice of nurses towards prevention of pressure ulcer and associated factors in Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

              Background Pressure ulcers are the common conditions among patients hospitalized in acute and chronic care facilities and impose significant burden on patients, their relatives and caregivers. Pressure ulcers have been described as one of the most costly and physically debilitating complications since the 20th century. The pain and discomfort due to pressure ulcer prolongs illness, rehabilitation, time of discharge and even contribute to disability and death. This study was aimed to assess knowledge, practice and factors associated with pressure ulcer prevention among nurses in Gondar University Hospital, North-west Ethiopia. Method An institution-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from March 15 - April 10, 2014 among 248 nurses in Gondar University hospital. A pretested and structured self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Data were entered using EPI info version 3.5.3 statistical software and analyzed using SPSS version 20 statistical package. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the study population in relation to relevant variables. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was also carried out to see the effect of each independent variable on the dependent variable. Result Nearly half (54.4 %) of the nurses had good knowledge; similarly 48.4 % of them had good practice on prevention of pressure ulcer. Educational status [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.4, 95 % CI (1.39-4.15)], work experience [AOR = 4.8, 95 % CI (1.31-10.62)] and having formal training [AOR = 4.1, 95 % CI (1.29-9.92)] were significantly associated with knowledge on prevention of pressure ulcer. While, satisfaction with nursing leadership [AOR = 1.9, 95 % CI (1.04-3.82)], staff shortage [AOR = 0.07, 95 % CI (0.03-0.13)] and inadequate facilities and equipment [AOR = 0.4, 95 % CI (0.19-0.83)] were found to be significantly associated with the practice on prevention of pressure ulcer. Conclusion Knowledge and practice of the nurses regarding prevention of pressure ulcer was found to be inadequate. Having higher educational status, attending formal training and being experienced were positively associated with knowledge; while shortage of facilities and equipments, dissatisfaction with nursing leadership and inadequate staff number showed negative association with practice of nurse’s pressure ulcer prevention. In-service training and upgrading courses are some of the important steps to improve nurses’ knowledge and practice on prevention of ulcer pressure. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12912-015-0076-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tcuhawenimana@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Nurs
                BMC Nurs
                BMC Nursing
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6955
                28 January 2025
                28 January 2025
                2025
                : 24
                : 104
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Intensive Care Unit, Kigali University Teaching Hospital, ( https://ror.org/038vngd42) Kigali, Rwanda
                [2 ]College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Rwanda, ( https://ror.org/00286hs46) Po. Box: 3286, Kigali, Rwanda
                [3 ]School of Medicine, Adventist University of Central Africa, ( https://ror.org/02n0het18) Kigali, Rwanda
                Article
                2754
                10.1186/s12912-025-02754-1
                11776269
                39875962
                13e3040b-77d1-493a-a5d0-9234f602513e
                © The Author(s) 2025

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 October 2024
                : 22 January 2025
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2025

                Nursing
                assessment,nurse’s knowledge,prevention of pressure injury,critically ill patients
                Nursing
                assessment, nurse’s knowledge, prevention of pressure injury, critically ill patients

                Comments

                Comment on this article