32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 10. Programme performance and its assessment

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          While the evidence supporting the effectiveness of community health worker (CHW) programmes is substantial, there is also considerable evidence that many of these programmes have notable weaknesses that need to be addressed in order for them to reach their full potential. Thus, considerations about CHW programme performance and its assessment must be taken into account as the importance of these programmes is becoming more widely appreciated. In this paper, the tenth in our 11-paper series, “Community health workers at the dawn of a new era”, we address CHW programme performance and how it is assessed from a systems perspective.

          Methods

          The paper builds on the 2014 CHW Reference Guide, a compendium of case studies of 29 national CHW programmes, the 2018 WHO guideline on health policy and system support to optimize CHW programmes, and scientific studies on CHW programme performance published in the past 5 years.

          Results

          The paper provides an overview of existing frameworks that are useful for assessing the performance of CHW programmes, with a specific focus on how individual CHW performance and community-level outcomes can be measured. The paper also reviews approaches that have been taken to assess CHW programme performance, from programme monitoring using the routine health information system to national assessments using quantitative and/or qualitative study designs and assessment checklists. The paper also discusses contextual factors that influence CHW programme performance, and reflects upon gaps and needs for the future with regard to assessment of CHW programme performance.

          Conclusion

          Assessments of CHW programme performance can have various approaches and foci according to the programme and its context. Given the fact that CHW programmes are complex entities and part of health systems, their assessment ideally needs to be based on data derived from a mix of reliable sources. Assessments should be focused not only on effectiveness (what works) but also on contextual factors and enablers (how, for whom, under what circumstances). Investment in performance assessment is instrumental for continually innovating, upgrading, and improving CHW programmes at scale. Now is the time for new efforts in implementation research for strengthening CHW programming.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review

            Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly recognized as an integral component of the health workforce needed to achieve public health goals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many factors influence CHW performance. A systematic review was conducted to identify intervention design related factors influencing performance of CHWs. We systematically searched six databases for quantitative and qualitative studies that included CHWs working in promotional, preventive or curative primary health services in LMICs. One hundred and forty studies met the inclusion criteria, were quality assessed and double read to extract data relevant to the design of CHW programmes. A preliminary framework containing factors influencing CHW performance and characteristics of CHW performance (such as motivation and competencies) guided the literature search and review. A mix of financial and non-financial incentives, predictable for the CHWs, was found to be an effective strategy to enhance performance, especially of those CHWs with multiple tasks. Performance-based financial incentives sometimes resulted in neglect of unpaid tasks. Intervention designs which involved frequent supervision and continuous training led to better CHW performance in certain settings. Supervision and training were often mentioned as facilitating factors, but few studies tested which approach worked best or how these were best implemented. Embedment of CHWs in community and health systems was found to diminish workload and increase CHW credibility. Clearly defined CHW roles and introduction of clear processes for communication among different levels of the health system could strengthen CHW performance. When designing community-based health programmes, factors that increased CHW performance in comparable settings should be taken into account. Additional intervention research to develop a better evidence base for the most effective training and supervision mechanisms and qualitative research to inform policymakers in development of CHW interventions are needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Framing the Questions

              In the first of a series of articles addressing the current challenges and opportunities for the development of Health Policy & Systems Research (HPSR), Kabir Sheikh and colleagues lay out the main questions vexing the field.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hperry2@jhu.edu
                Journal
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Research Policy and Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1478-4505
                12 October 2021
                12 October 2021
                2021
                : 19
                Issue : Suppl 3 Issue sponsor : Publication costs were covered by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Supplement Editors were not involved in the peer review for any article that they co-authored. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no other competing interests.
                : 108
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11503.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2181 1687, Department of Global Health, , KIT Royal Tropical Institute, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Crigler Consulting, LLC, Hillsborough, NC USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.11194.3c, ISNI 0000 0004 0620 0548, Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, , Makerere University College of Health Sciences, ; Kampala, Uganda
                [4 ]Community Health Impact Coalition, New York, NY USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.59734.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, Department of Global Health and Health Systems Design, , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, ; New York, NY USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.17089.37, School of Public Health, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, AB Canada
                [7 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Department of International Health, , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0889-8663
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0107-4047
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-3311
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0561-0492
                Article
                758
                10.1186/s12961-021-00758-2
                8506096
                33388085
                13795d88-e9ed-49c7-946a-bb50e6df8982
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 16 June 2021
                : 17 June 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation;
                Award ID: ID OPP 1197181
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Health & Social care
                community health workers,performance,monitoring,primary healthcare
                Health & Social care
                community health workers, performance, monitoring, primary healthcare

                Comments

                Comment on this article