2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      “Listen to the People”: Public Deliberation About Social Distancing Measures in a Pandemic

      , ,
      The American Journal of Bioethics
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Public engagement in ethically laden pandemic planning decisions may be important for transparency, creating public trust, improving compliance with public health orders, and ultimately, contributing to just outcomes. We conducted focus groups with members of the public to characterize public perceptions about social distancing measures likely to be implemented during a pandemic. Participants expressed concerns about job security and economic strain on families if businesses or school closures are prolonged. They shared opposition to closure of religious organizations, citing the need for shared support and worship during times of crises. Group discussions elicited evidence of community-mindedness (e.g., recognition of an extant duty not to infect others), while some also acknowledged strong self-interest. Participants conveyed desire for opportunities for public input and education, and articulated distrust of government. Social distancing measures may be challenging to implement and sustain due to strains on family resources and lack of trust in government.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An ethics framework for public health.

          Nancy Kass (2001)
          More than 100 years ago, public health began as an organized discipline, its purpose being to improve the health of populations rather than of individuals. Given its population-based focus, however, public health perennially faces dilemmas concerning the appropriate extent of its reach and whether its activities infringe on individual liberties in ethically troublesome ways. In this article a framework for ethics analysis of public health programs is proposed. To advance traditional public health goals while maximizing individual liberties and furthering social justice, public health interventions should reduce morbidity or mortality; data must substantiate that a program (or the series of programs of which a program is a part) will reduce morbidity or mortality; burdens of the program must be identified and minimized; the program must be implemented fairly and must, at times, minimize preexisting social injustices; and fair procedures must be used to determine which burdens are acceptable to a community.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Basic Content Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Deliberative Democracy

              Jon Elster (1998)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The American Journal of Bioethics
                The American Journal of Bioethics
                Informa UK Limited
                1526-5161
                1536-0075
                November 04 2009
                November 04 2009
                : 9
                : 11
                : 4-14
                Article
                10.1080/15265160903197531
                19882444
                12c3706b-5558-43c0-8425-b14e2cb40d74
                © 2009
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article