68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: key concepts and terms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Understanding the patient safety literature has been compromised by the inconsistent use of language.

          Objectives

          To identify key concepts of relevance to the International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS) proposed by the World Alliance For Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (WHO), and agree on definitions and preferred terms.

          Methods

          Six principles were agreed upon—that the concepts and terms should: be applicable across the full spectrum of healthcare; be consistent with concepts from other WHO Classifications; have meanings as close as possible to those in colloquial use; convey the appropriate meanings with respect to patient safety; be brief and clear, without unnecessary or redundant qualifiers; be fit-for-purpose for the ICPS.

          Results

          Definitions and preferred terms were agreed for 48 concepts of relevance to the ICPS; these were described and the relationships between them and the ICPS were outlined.

          Conclusions

          The consistent use of key concepts, definitions and preferred terms should pave the way for better understanding, for comparisons between facilities and jurisdictions, and for trends to be tracked over time. Changes and improvements, translation into other languages and alignment with other sets of patient safety definitions will be necessary. This work represents the start of an ongoing process of progressively improving a common international understanding of terms and concepts relevant to patient safety.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Human Error

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events.

            The current US national discussions on patient safety are not based on a common language. This hinders systematic application of data obtained from incident reports, and learning from near misses and adverse events. To develop a common terminology and classification schema (taxonomy) for collecting and organizing patient safety data. The project comprised a systematic literature review; evaluation of existing patient safety terminologies and classifications, and identification of those that should be included in the core set of a standardized taxonomy; assessment of the taxonomy's face and content validity; the gathering of input from patient safety stakeholders in multiple disciplines; and a preliminary study of the taxonomy's comparative reliability. Elements (terms) and structures (data fields) from existing classification schemes and reporting systems could be grouped into five complementary root nodes or primary classifications: impact, type, domain, cause, and prevention and mitigation. The root nodes were then divided into 21 subclassifications which in turn are subdivided into more than 200 coded categories and an indefinite number of uncoded text fields to capture narrative information. An earlier version of the taxonomy (n = 111 coded categories) demonstrated acceptable comparability with the categorized data requirements of the ICU safety reporting system. The results suggest that the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) Patient Safety Event Taxonomy could facilitate a common approach for patient safety information systems. Having access to standardized data would make it easier to file patient safety event reports and to conduct root cause analyses in a consistent fashion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification.

              More needs to be done to improve safety and quality and to manage risks in health care. Existing processes are fragmented and there is no single comprehensive source of information about what goes wrong. An integrated framework for the management of safety, quality and risk is needed, with an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification. The World Alliance for Patient Safety provides a platform for the development of a coherent approach; 43 desirable attributes for such an approach are discussed. An example of an incident management and information system serving a patient safety classification is presented, with a brief account of how and where it is currently used. Any such system is valueless unless it improves safety and quality. Quadruple-loop learning (personal, local, national and international) is proposed with examples of how an exemplar system has been successfully used at the various levels. There is currently an opportunity to "get it right" by international cooperation via the World Health Organization to develop an integrated framework incorporating systems that can accommodate information from all sources, manage and monitor things that go wrong, and allow the worldwide sharing of information and the dissemination of tools for the implementation of strategies which have been shown to work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Qual Health Care
                intqhc
                intqhc
                International Journal for Quality in Health Care
                Oxford University Press
                1353-4505
                1464-3677
                February 2009
                February 2009
                : 21
                : 1
                : 18-26
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of South Australia, Joanna Briggs Institute and Royal Adelaide Hospital , Level 5 McEwin Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Tce Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia
                [2 ]National Patient Safety Agency , 4-8 Maple St, London W1T 5HD, UK
                [3 ]Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University Medical School , Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
                [4 ]Hasselt University , Campus Diepenbeek, Agoralaan, Building D, Room A 55, BE-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
                [5 ]Department of Health Services Research, Division of Quality Measurement and Research, The Joint Commission , One Renaissance Boulevard, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181, USA
                [6 ]Measurements and Health Information Systems Department, Information, Evidence and Research, World Health Organization , 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [* ]Address reprint requests to: William Runciman, University of South Australia, Joanna Briggs Institute and Royal Adelaide Hospital , Level 5 McEwin Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Tce Adelaide 5000, SA, Australia
                Article
                mzn057
                10.1093/intqhc/mzn057
                2638755
                19147597
                110ac880-a3a8-4802-bd9e-138189022374
                Published by Oxford University Press 2009

                The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

                History
                : 12 November 2008
                Categories
                Papers

                Medicine
                patient safety,definitions,concepts,classification,terminology
                Medicine
                patient safety, definitions, concepts, classification, terminology

                Comments

                Comment on this article