3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Emotion regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic: risk and resilience factors for parental burnout (IIPB)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d2705131e115">The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted families' lives around the world. The measures used to contain transmission have led to increased stress and put parents at increased risk for parental burnout (PB). The aim of the current study was to examine the association between COVID-related parental stress and PB, and to test whether emotion regulation (ER) moderated this association. We hypothesised that rumination, which is a generally maladaptive ER strategy, would act as a risk factor. In comparison, we hypothesised that reappraisal, which is a generally adaptive ER strategy, would act as a resilience factor. We assessed 8225 parents from 22 countries using an on-line survey, and focused on general stress and parenting stress. These stressors were associated with greater PB. Importantly, parental ER moderated these associations; rumination strengthened the link between stress-related variables and PB, whereas reappraisal weakened it. This study emphasises the negative effect COVID-19 has on parents and highlights key ER risk and resilience factors. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms.

            As a social species, humans rely on a safe, secure social surround to survive and thrive. Perceptions of social isolation, or loneliness, increase vigilance for threat and heighten feelings of vulnerability while also raising the desire to reconnect. Implicit hypervigilance for social threat alters psychological processes that influence physiological functioning, diminish sleep quality, and increase morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this paper is to review the features and consequences of loneliness within a comprehensive theoretical framework that informs interventions to reduce loneliness. We review physical and mental health consequences of loneliness, mechanisms for its effects, and effectiveness of extant interventions. Features of a loneliness regulatory loop are employed to explain cognitive, behavioral, and physiological consequences of loneliness and to discuss interventions to reduce loneliness. Loneliness is not simply being alone. Interventions to reduce loneliness and its health consequences may need to take into account its attentional, confirmatory, and memorial biases as well as its social and behavioral effects.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Cognition and Emotion
                Cognition and Emotion
                Informa UK Limited
                0269-9931
                1464-0600
                January 02 2022
                November 25 2021
                January 02 2022
                : 36
                : 1
                : 100-105
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
                [2 ]Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
                [3 ]Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
                Article
                10.1080/02699931.2021.2005544
                34821543
                0fdbecfb-72d5-4a54-906c-92aac9f8b435
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article