79
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Are animal models predictive for humans?

      review-article
      1 , 2 , , 2
      Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is one of the central aims of the philosophy of science to elucidate the meanings of scientific terms and also to think critically about their application. The focus of this essay is the scientific term predict and whether there is credible evidence that animal models, especially in toxicology and pathophysiology, can be used to predict human outcomes. Whether animals can be used to predict human response to drugs and other chemicals is apparently a contentious issue. However, when one empirically analyzes animal models using scientific tools they fall far short of being able to predict human responses. This is not surprising considering what we have learned from fields such evolutionary and developmental biology, gene regulation and expression, epigenetics, complexity theory, and comparative genomics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Modelling the molecular circuitry of cancer.

          Cancer arises from a stepwise accumulation of genetic changes that liberates neoplastic cells from the homeostatic mechanisms that govern normal cell proliferation. In humans, at least four to six mutations are required to reach this state, but fewer seem to be required in mice. By rationalizing the shared and unique elements of human and mouse models of cancer, we should be able to identify the molecular circuits that function differently in humans and mice, and use this knowledge to improve existing models of cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Opinion: Comparative biology of mouse versus human cells: modelling human cancer in mice.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Philos Ethics Humanit Med
                Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM
                BioMed Central
                1747-5341
                2009
                15 January 2009
                : 4
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wichita State University, Department of History, 1845 N Fairmont, Fiske Hall, Wichita KS 67260, USA
                [2 ]Americans For Medical Advancement, 2251 Refugio Rd Goleta, CA 93117, USA
                Article
                1747-5341-4-2
                10.1186/1747-5341-4-2
                2642860
                19146696
                0dc3cbec-78ae-499e-bbf7-399f3d27df0b
                Copyright © 2009 Shanks et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 July 2008
                : 15 January 2009
                Categories
                Review

                Philosophy of science
                Philosophy of science

                Comments

                Comment on this article