19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Who pays for healthcare in Bangladesh? An analysis of progressivity in health systems financing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The relationship between payments towards healthcare and ability to pay is a measure of financial fairness. Analysis of progressivity is important from an equity perspective as well as for macroeconomic and political analysis of healthcare systems. Bangladesh health systems financing is characterized by high out-of-pocket payments (63.3%), which is increasing. Hence, we aimed to see who pays what part of this high out-of-pocket expenditure. To our knowledge, this was the first progressivity analysis of health systems financing in Bangladesh.

          Methods

          We used data from Bangladesh Household Income and Expenditure Survey, 2010. This was a cross sectional and nationally representative sample of 12,240 households consisting of 55,580 individuals. For quantification of progressivity, we adopted the ‘ability-to-pay’ principle developed by O’Donnell, van Doorslaer, Wagstaff, and Lindelow (2008). We used the Kakwani index to measure the magnitude of progressivity.

          Results

          Health systems financing in Bangladesh is regressive. Inequality increases due to healthcare payments. The differences between the Gini coefficient and the Kakwani index for all sources of finance are negative, which indicates regressivity, and that financing is more concentrated among the poor. Income inequality increases due to high out-of-pocket payments. The increase in income inequality caused by out-of-pocket payments is 89% due to negative vertical effect and 11% due to horizontal inequity.

          Conclusions

          Our findings add substantial evidence of health systems financing impact on inequitable financial burden of healthcare and income. The heavy reliance on out-of-pocket payments may affect household living standards. If the government and people of Bangladesh are concerned about equitable financing burden, our study suggests that Bangladesh needs to reform the health systems financing scheme.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measurement of Tax Progressivity: An International Comparison

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Insuring Consumption Against Illness

            One of the most sizable and least predictable shocks to economic opportunities in developing countries is major illness. We investigate the extent to which families are able to insure consumption against major illness using a unique panel data set from Indonesia that combines excellent measures of health status with consumption information. We find that there are significant economic costs associated with major illness, and that there is very imperfect insurance of consumption over illness episodes. These estimates suggest that public disability insurance or subsidies for medical care may improve welfare by providing consumption insurance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Equity in Health Care Financing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Studies Using Benefit and Financing Incidence Analyses

              Introduction Health financing reforms in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) over the past decades have focused on achieving equity in financing of health care delivery through universal health coverage. Benefit and financing incidence analyses are two analytical methods for comprehensively evaluating how well health systems perform on these objectives. This systematic review assesses progress towards equity in health care financing in LMICs through the use of BIA and FIA. Methods and Findings Key electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Scopus, Global Health, CinAHL, EconLit and Business Source Premier were searched. We also searched the grey literature, specifically websites of leading organizations supporting health care in LMICs. Only studies using benefit incidence analysis (BIA) and/or financing incidence analysis (FIA) as explicit methodology were included. A total of 512 records were obtained from the various sources. The full texts of 87 references were assessed against the selection criteria and 24 were judged appropriate for inclusion. Twelve of the 24 studies originated from sub-Saharan Africa, nine from the Asia-Pacific region, two from Latin America and one from the Middle East. The evidence points to a pro-rich distribution of total health care benefits and progressive financing in both sub-Saharan Africa and Asia-Pacific. In the majority of cases, the distribution of benefits at the primary health care level favoured the poor while hospital level services benefit the better-off. A few Asian countries, namely Thailand, Malaysia and Sri Lanka, maintained a pro-poor distribution of health care benefits and progressive financing. Conclusion Studies evaluated in this systematic review indicate that health care financing in LMICs benefits the rich more than the poor but the burden of financing also falls more on the rich. There is some evidence that primary health care is pro-poor suggesting a greater investment in such services and removal of barriers to care can enhance equity. The results overall suggest that there are impediments to making health care more accessible to the poor and this must be addressed if universal health coverage is to be a reality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                amolla@murraystate.edu , maazaher@gmail.com
                chunhuei.chi@oregonstate.edu
                Journal
                Int J Equity Health
                Int J Equity Health
                International Journal for Equity in Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1475-9276
                6 September 2017
                6 September 2017
                2017
                : 16
                : 167
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1498 6059, GRID grid.8198.8, Institute of Health Economics, , University of Dhaka, ; Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0740 0726, GRID grid.214409.a, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Public and Community Health, , School of Nursing and Health Professions, Murray State University, ; Murray, KY USA
                [3 ]School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Milam 13, Corvallis, OR 97331-5109 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2112 1969, GRID grid.4391.f, Graduate Program in Health Management and Policy, , College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, ; Milam 13, Corvallis, OR 97331-5109 USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2112 1969, GRID grid.4391.f, Graduate Program in Applied Economics, , Oregon State University, ; Milam 13, Corvallis, OR 97331-5109 USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2112 1969, GRID grid.4391.f, Graduate Program in Public Policy, , Oregon State University, ; Milam 13, Corvallis, OR 97331-5109 USA
                Article
                654
                10.1186/s12939-017-0654-3
                5586060
                28874198
                0c47c359-9b19-49ba-874d-da5f950d4328
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 March 2017
                : 20 August 2017
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Health & Social care
                progressivity,ability-to-pay,household healthcare expenditure,health equity,out-of-pocket payments

                Comments

                Comment on this article