2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Decrease in viral hepatitis diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor: The COVID-19 pandemic has put a major strain on healthcare systems around the globe. Early reports have shown sharp reductions in most non-COVID diagnoses, from aortic dissections to cancer. 1 , 2 Efforts to control the pandemic have also had an important impact on the availability and capacity of viral hepatitis testing services. 3 In addition, the perceived risk of COVID-19 may affect a patient’s willingness to visit healthcare professionals. Together, this may result in delayed or missed opportunities to diagnose patients with chronic viral hepatitis. A recent modelling study by Blach et al. published in Journal of Hepatology, underscores the potential detrimental effect on patient outcomes associated with disruptions in interventions aimed at viral hepatitis elimination. 4 However, the magnitude of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on viral hepatitis care in the EU region is currently unclear. HBV/HCV infections are notifiable conditions under the Dutch Public Health Act, and testing facilities automatically report novel positive test results to the local Public Health Service. After assessment by specialised staff the cases are classified as novel acute or chronic infections and reported electronically to the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. In order to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on novel chronic HBV and HCV diagnoses, we compared the number of reported cases in 2020 to the number of cases reported in 2019. In 2019, there were 1,105 novel chronic HBV and 664 novel chronic HCV diagnoses, which declined to 674 and 379 in 2020. We therefore observed an overall reduction of novel chronic viral hepatitis diagnoses of 40% (39% for HBV and 43% for HCV, p <0.001 compared to 2019). Interestingly, the weekly relative reduction in new chronic HBV and HCV diagnoses mirrored the weekly number of COVID-19 admission in the Netherlands. The sharpest drops in novel reported cases coincided with the peaks of the first and second COVID-19 admission waves (COVID-19 data from the NICE foundation, 5 Fig. 1 ). Still, even during the summer months when the number of COVID-19 admissions was limited, the number of reported chronic viral hepatitis cases remained below the number reported in 2019. Fig. 1 COVID-19 admissions and HBV/HCV diagnoses in the Netherlands. The number of COVID-19 admissions in the Netherlands per week in 2020 (upper panel) and the reduction in the number of weekly reported new chronic HBV and HCV diagnoses in 2020 compared to the same week in 2019 (lower panel, with weekly reported cases in grey and the moving average in dashed black). It is important to note that the current findings contrast sharply with previous observations that the number of reported acute HBV cases in the Netherlands did not decline during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. 6 This discrepancy is probably explained by the high frequency of clinical symptoms in patients with acute HBV, which may prompt consultation with healthcare providers. Conversely, chronic HBV and HCV are often asymptomatic and novel cases are typically identified only through additional testing performed in patients with elevated liver enzymes found during evaluation of (often unrelated) non-specific complaints, or as part of screening for sexually transmitted infections. A study in primary care practices in the Netherlands reported a rapid decline in the number of patients consulting general practitioners for non-severe symptoms during the COVID pandemic, 7 and the strong reduction in novel chronic viral hepatitis cases that persisted even during periods with low numbers of COVID admissions therefore most likely reflects missed opportunities for diagnosis and not delays in reporting. This is all the more relevant since the next opportunity for diagnosis may only come once the first liver-related complication has already developed. 8 It is therefore imperative that once widespread vaccination strategies allow for reallocation of healthcare assets to non-COVID related care, we refocus our attention to meeting WHO hepatitis elimination goals by identifying and linking these non-diagnosed patients to care. We will continue our monitoring of viral hepatitis diagnoses in the Netherlands to quantify to what extent these efforts are successful. Financial support The authors received no financial support to produce this manuscript. Authors’ contributions Study concept and design, data acquisition and analysis, critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content and approval of final version: all authors. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest that pertain to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fewer cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 epidemic in the Netherlands

          The dreadful consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) put an unprecedented pressure on health-care services across the globe. 1 The Netherlands, a country with 17·4 million inhabitants that provides its citizens with universal access to essential health-care services—with the general practitioner as the gatekeeper to secondary care—is no exception in this regard. The first patient with COVID-19 in the Netherlands was confirmed on Feb 27, 2020, in the southern part of the country. 2 Thereafter, the disease spread rapidly throughout the country. Subsequently, strict social distancing policies were implemented by the Dutch government as of March 15, 2020, to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.3, 4 The mayhem caused by COVID-19 has brought about substantial changes in cancer diagnosis in the Netherlands. Data from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry in the period between Feb 24, 2020, and April 12, 2020—which are based on initial case ascertainment through pathological cancer notifications from the Nationwide Network of Histopathology and Cytopathology—show that there is a notable decrease in cancer diagnoses when compared with the period before the COVID-19 outbreak. This effect was most pronounced for skin cancers (figure ) and observed across all age groups and geographical regions, and almost all cancer sites (appendix). Several arguments might explain this decrease. First, individuals with potential, non-specific symptoms of cancer might have barriers to consulting a general practitioner, including moral concerns about wasting the general practitioner's time for non-COVID-19-related symptoms, assumptions about insufficient capacity for essential non-COVID-19-related health-care services, and anxiety about acquiring COVID-19 in a health-care setting. Second, most of the general practitioner consultations for non-acute issues are transitioned to telehealth. A general practitioner might, therefore, postpone initial investigations for symptoms that do not immediately hint towards a potential cancer diagnosis, resulting in delayed or postponed hospital referrals. Third, hospitals might have postponed diagnostic evaluation or have longer turnaround times for diagnostic evaluation because many hospital-based resources are being allocated to tackle COVID-19. Lastly, national screening programmes for breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer are temporarily halted as of March 16, 2020, to alleviate the demand on the health-care system due to COVID-19. The effect of this pause in cancer diagnosis might be more pronounced after extended periods of follow-up. However, this effect might be less notable for cervical cancer because screening aims to identify precancerous lesions. Collectively, fewer cancer diagnoses in the COVID-19 era will result from patient, doctor, and system factors. 5 Figure Number of cancer diagnoses by week in the Netherlands in the period between Jan 6, 2020 (calendar week 2) and April 12, 2020 (calendar week 15) Basal cell carcinoma of the skin is not included in the statistics. The point estimates for the change in cancer diagnoses per calendar week are based on the mean total number of cancer diagnoses in the calendar weeks from 2 to 8; that is, the period before the COVID-19 outbreak in the Netherlands. Approximately 3400 malignancies were notified per week to the Netherlands Cancer Registry in the calendar weeks from 2 to 8. Of note, these figures do not yet include cases diagnosed in one of the 74 hospitals in the Netherlands. COVID-19=coronavirus disease 2019. The upsetting findings of fewer cancer diagnoses were initially disseminated among the Dutch community on April 2, 2020, and again on April 15, 2020, by the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation—which hosts the Netherlands Cancer Registry—to create awareness of this issue. The aims of this dissemination were multifold. First, individuals were encouraged to consult their general practitioner whenever symptoms continued to be troublesome. Second, general practitioners were encouraged to refer patients with suspected cancer to oncology specialists. Third, an appeal was made to restart national cancer screening programmes. Lastly, misconceptions were eliminated about a heightened risk of contracting COVID-19 in a health-care setting because of inadequate policies for infection control at the institutional level and resource constraints in the delivery of essential oncological care. Priorities for cancer care amid the COVID-19 pandemic will be meticulously triaged on the basis of a multitude of factors that are outside the scope of this Comment. General frameworks to inform cancer treatment decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed elsewhere.6, 7, 8, 9 It does merit brief acknowledgment that the effect of a reasonable delay in the management of particular low-risk malignancies (eg, many skin cancers) will only marginally affect the quantity and quality of life. Conversely, the treatment for potentially curable cancers with an imminent risk of early death (eg, acute leukaemias) cannot be safely postponed. The data discussed here support the National Oncology Taskforce and the National Coordination Centre for Patient Distribution to safeguard optimal patient access to essential oncological care throughout all hospitals in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Cancer Registry will, in due course, complete the registration of current and new cases via retrospective medical records review. These more detailed data—including various patient (eg, COVID-19 positivity), tumour, and treatment characteristics, and follow-up—will ultimately establish the effect of the COVID-19 outbreak on oncological care in the Netherlands. This information can also guide the public, policymakers, and physicians in the future whenever an outbreak of a similar magnitude occurs. This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com/oncology on May 4, 2020
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of COVID-19 on global hepatitis C elimination efforts

            Background & Aims COVID-19 has placed significant strain on national healthcare systems at a critical moment in the context of hepatitis elimination. Mathematical models can be used to evaluate the possible impact of programmatic delays on hepatitis disease burden. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the incremental change in hepatitis C liver-related deaths and liver cancer, following a 3-month, 6-month, or 1-year hiatus in hepatitis elimination program progress. Methods Previously developed models were adapted for 110 countries to include a status quo or “no delay” scenario and a “1-year delay” scenario assuming significant disruption in interventions (screening, diagnosis and treatment) in the year 2020. Annual, country-level, model outcomes were extracted, and weighted averages were used to calculate regional (WHO and World Bank Income Group) and global estimates from 2020 to 2030. The incremental annual change in outcomes was calculated by subtracting the “no-delay” estimates from the “1-year delay” estimates. Results The “1-year delay” scenario resulted in 44,800 (95% UI: 43,800 – 49,300) excess hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases and 72,300 (95% UI: 70,600 – 79,400) excess liver-related deaths (LRDs), relative to the “no delay” scenario globally, from 2020-2030. Most missed treatments would be in lower-middle income countries, while most excess HCC and LRDs would be among high-income countries. Conclusions The impact of COVID-19 extends beyond the direct morbidity and mortality associated with exposure and infection. In order to mitigate the impact on viral hepatitis programming and reduce excess mortality from delayed treatment, policy makers should prioritize hepatitis programs as soon as it becomes safe to do so.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on testing services for HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections in the WHO European Region, March to August 2020

              We present preliminary results of a coronavirus disease (COVID-19) impact assessment on testing for HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections in the WHO European Region. We analyse 98 responses from secondary care (n = 36), community testing sites (n = 52) and national level (n = 10). Compared to pre-COVID-19, 95% of respondents report decreased testing volumes during March–May and 58% during June–August 2020. Reasons for decreases and mitigation measures were analysed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hepatol
                J Hepatol
                Journal of Hepatology
                European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V.
                0168-8278
                1600-0641
                20 April 2021
                September 2022
                20 April 2021
                : 77
                : 3
                : 896-897
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                [2 ]National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, Epidemiology and Surveillance, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Donor Medicine Research, Laboratory of Blood Borne Infections, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Address: Gastroenterologist & Hepatologist, Epidemiologist, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
                Article
                S0168-8278(21)00250-6
                10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.015
                9377202
                33887356
                0b8227ba-5396-48db-babe-a9d6ddd2c367
                © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 19 March 2021
                : 9 April 2021
                : 12 April 2021
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                hbv,hcv,covid-19
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                hbv, hcv, covid-19

                Comments

                Comment on this article