1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Different SARS-CoV-2 variants, same prevention strategies

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Letter to the Editor On the 24th of November 2021, the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) of South Africa reported the detection of a new COVID-19 variant of concern (VOC), named B.1.1.529, from a specimen collected on the 9th of November 2021 [1]. Early evidence on this variant suggests that it has a very unusual array of mutations, increased antibody resistance and is possibly more transmissible. Some countries have responded by issuing travel restrictions from South Africa and other countries in the region. Several studies are already underway to understand the variant's properties, such as whether it can evade immune responses triggered by vaccines and the severity of disease in infected individuals. The announcement of the detection of VOCs brings anxiety, both to the public and to healthcare providers, as the worst scenarios are anticipated. Similar to when the delta variant was detected, concerns of increased transmissibility, changing disease patterns, vaccine effectiveness, and the effectiveness of the pre-existing infection prevention and control measures arises. From the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and before the availability of vaccines, measures such as physical distancing, wearing of medical facemasks, hand hygiene (washing hands with liquid soap or using alcohol-based hand sanitisers), improving ventilation of indoor spaces and avoiding crowded spaces and unnecessary gatherings were the cruxes of infection prevention and control. These measures were in addition to key public health interventions, such as isolating of confirmed cases and quarantining of close contacts. Throughout the pandemic, from the alpha variant to the beta variant and lastly the delta variant, these interventions have remained very important. With fears of reduced vaccine effectiveness against the delta variant, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that the public maintain these prevention measures. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has also continued to encourage these strategies in the face of vaccine inequity, with many low-to-middle income countries still far from attaining their herd immunity thresholds. Viruses mutate all the time and, whilst the clinical and epidemiological characteristics may change, the control measures remain the same. A few weeks before the B.1.1.529 variant was announced, South Africa had asked Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer to delay delivery of COVID-19 vaccines because the country was overstocked, with reports of serious vaccine hesitancy among the population [2]. As of the 26th of November 2021, 35% of the South African adult population were fully vaccinated [3], which is half the government's year-end target. There is need to rejuvenate the vaccination momentum in South Africa and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa to propel them towards their herd immunity thresholds and realise population-wide benefits. This requires renewed vigour and innovative strategies to fight vaccine hesitancy in these countries. Vaccination is one of the most critical public health interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, and convincing evidence of this has been provided in various studies, with countries that are advanced with vaccination programmes now reporting markedly reduced COVID-19 deaths despite high incident cases. However, it is important to note that vaccination alone is insufficient to contain the outbreak and adherence to the standard infection prevention and control measures remains key. A study conducted among 19,933 adults living in South Africa revealed that over three-quarters of respondents self-reported violating stay home orders [4]. Similarly, poor face mask use and symptomatic individuals not self-isolating has been reported in South Africa [5]. Pandemic fatigue, a phenomenon where the population get tired of hearing about the pandemic and abiding to control measures, which has been described widely in other settings, is a likely driver of the violations of staying home orders, mask wearing and physical distancing. In Zimbabwe, pandemic fatigue, leading to human complacency, was perceived as a key driver of the third COVID-19 wave that occurred between June and August 2020. The public must be reminded of the need to guard against complacency and remain vigilant, especially as we get into the festive season, which is associated with increased human mobility, including in-country and international travels. To this end, various public health stakeholders involved in risk-communication and community engagement need to devise innovative ways of communicating with the public regarding the emergence of VOCs, the need to stick to standard infection prevention and control protocols, and that currently available vaccines are safe and effective. The public also needs to be alerted to the fact that SARS-CoV-2 is likely to persist as an important respiratory pathogen in the future, VOCs will continue to emerge, prevention will remain our key strategy to limit the morbidity and associated mortality, and socioeconomic disruptions associated with harsh epidemic waves will continue. The use of all the different forms of communication available, including diverse social media to dispel falsehoods, myths and misconceptions and fight against vaccine hesitancy ahead of conspiracy theorists and antivaxxers, is important. Lastly, there is a strong need to emphasise that, despite the continued emergence of new VOCs, the same control strategies still work.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          International citizen project to assess early stage adherence to public health measures for COVID-19 in South Africa

          Introduction With over 500 000 infections and nearly 12 000 deaths, South Africa (SA) is the African epicenter of the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. SA has implemented a 5-stage Risk-Adjusted Strategy which includes a phased national lockdown, requiring social distancing, frequent hand washing and wearing face masks. Strict adherence to this strategy is crucial to reducing COVID-19 transmission, flattening the curve, and preventing resurgence. As part of the 22-country International Citizens Project COVID-19 (ICPcovid), this study aimed to describe the SA adherence to the Risk-Adjusted Strategy and identify determinants of adherence. Method During 24 April-15 May 2020, people were electronically invited, through social media platforms and a text blast, to complete an online survey, accessible via www.icpcovid.com. The survey investigated COVID-19 testing and preventative adherence measures, then used logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of adherence. Results There were 951 participants, with 731(76.9%) 25 to 54 years. Most (672;70.7%) were female, and 705(74.1%) had a university degree. Since the epidemic started, 529(55.6%) and 436(45.9%) participants stated they were eating healthier and taking more vitamins, respectively. Only 82(8.6%) had been COVID-19 tested, and 1(1.2%) tested positive. In public, 905(95.2%) socially distanced, however 99(10.4%) participants had recently attended meetings with over ten people. Regular hand washing was practiced by 907(95.4%) participants, 774(81.4%) wore face masks and 854(89.8%) stayed home when they experienced flu-like symptoms. The odds of adhering to the guidelines were lower among men versus women (AOR 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.528, 0.971) and those who had flu-like symptoms (AOR 0.42, 95% CI = 0.277, 0.628). In contrast, increased odds were reported for those who reported increased vitamin intake (AOR 1.37, 95% CI = 1.044,1.798), and were either cohabiting or married (AOR 1.39, 95% CI = 1.042,1.847). Conclusion Despite high reported adherence, face mask use and symptomatic individuals not self-isolating, were areas for improvement. However, these factors cannot solely account for SA’s increasing COVID-19 cases. Larger general population studies are needed to identify other adherence predictors for a strengthened SA COVID-19 response. While the government must continue to educate the entire population on preventative measures, provide personal protective equipment and stress the importance of adherence, there also needs to be implementation of prioritised prevention strategies for men and single individuals to address their demonstrated lower adherence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Compliance with lockdown regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa: findings from an online survey

              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Public Health Pract (Oxf)
              Public Health Pract (Oxf)
              Public Health in Practice (Oxford, England)
              The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health.
              2666-5352
              11 December 2021
              June 2022
              11 December 2021
              : 3
              : 100223
              Affiliations
              [1]University of Pretoria School of Health Systems and Public Health, Pretoria, South Africa
              [2]Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
              [3]ICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe
              Author notes
              []Corresponding author.
              Article
              S2666-5352(21)00148-8 100223
              10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100223
              8664717
              0998e934-a7c6-46f0-be2b-8a1bdb855975
              © 2021 The Authors

              Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

              History
              : 29 November 2021
              : 10 December 2021
              Categories
              Article

              Comments

              Comment on this article