18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Eating and exercise behaviors in eating disorders and the general population during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Australia: Initial results from the COLLATE project

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Emerging evidence suggests that the coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic may be negatively impacting mental health. The impact on eating and exercise behaviors is, however, currently unknown. This study aimed to identify changes in eating and exercise behaviors in an Australian sample among individuals with an eating disorder, and the general population, amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic outbreak.

          Method

          A total of 5,469 participants, 180 of whom self‐reported an eating disorder history, completed questions relating to changes in eating and exercise behaviors since the emergence of the pandemic, as part of the COLLATE (COvid‐19 and you: mentaL heaLth in AusTralia now survEy) project; a national survey launched in Australia on April 1, 2020.

          Results

          In the eating disorders group, increased restricting, binge eating, purging, and exercise behaviors were found. In the general population, both increased restricting and binge eating behaviors were reported; however, respondents reported less exercise relative to before the pandemic.

          Discussion

          The findings have important implications for providing greater monitoring and support for eating disorder patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic. In addition, the mental and physical health impacts of changed eating and exercise behaviors in the general population need to be acknowledged and monitored for potential long‐term consequences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China

          Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users

            COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019) has significantly resulted in a large number of psychological consequences. The aim of this study is to explore the impacts of COVID-19 on people’s mental health, to assist policy makers to develop actionable policies, and help clinical practitioners (e.g., social workers, psychiatrists, and psychologists) provide timely services to affected populations. We sample and analyze the Weibo posts from 17,865 active Weibo users using the approach of Online Ecological Recognition (OER) based on several machine-learning predictive models. We calculated word frequency, scores of emotional indicators (e.g., anxiety, depression, indignation, and Oxford happiness) and cognitive indicators (e.g., social risk judgment and life satisfaction) from the collected data. The sentiment analysis and the paired sample t-test were performed to examine the differences in the same group before and after the declaration of COVID-19 on 20 January, 2020. The results showed that negative emotions (e.g., anxiety, depression and indignation) and sensitivity to social risks increased, while the scores of positive emotions (e.g., Oxford happiness) and life satisfaction decreased. People were concerned more about their health and family, while less about leisure and friends. The results contribute to the knowledge gaps of short-term individual changes in psychological conditions after the outbreak. It may provide references for policy makers to plan and fight against COVID-19 effectively by improving stability of popular feelings and urgently prepare clinical practitioners to deliver corresponding therapy foundations for the risk groups and affected people.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Eating disorders in the time of COVID-19

              We have all been stunned by the speed of this viral pandemic. At the time of writing, one fifth of the world is under lockdown. The main foci have been on the public health effort to contain the spread of the virus, and the care of individuals with acute infection. We, in eating disorders, must have a broader brief. Not only must we help care for those sufferers who contract COVID-19, we must also address the impact –psychological, financial and social - on those that do not. The peculiarities of COVID-19 and the reaction of the public and governments to it, have particular relevance for people living with an eating disorder and those who care for them. Traumatic events impact on people’s mental health. The fear of contagion and of the death of family members has created huge uncertainty. Isolation brings anxiety, sadness, anger and loneliness. Social distancing and ‘quarantine’ are against human nature. The negative emotional effects of “quarantine” [1] are likely to be accentuated for many anorexia nervosa sufferers who are already isolated both emotionally and physically. Impoverished interpersonal function will be more difficult to handle when severe “social distancing” is in place. These concerns do not just apply to people with eating disorders. Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York, has said “People are struggling with the emotions as much as they are struggling with the economics” [2]. People with an eating disorder have a complex problematic relationship with food which will be enhanced at this time of food insecurity and panic buying. There will no doubt be a plethora of research in the coming months and years documenting what impact COVID-19 will have on the eating disorder community from both a clinician and patient perspective. Before speculating on these potential risks and outcomes, it is worth learning from past similar outbreaks and, where indicated, applying these efforts to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Data involving patients suffering from MERS, SARS, influenza and Ebola [3] were unequivocal in high risk populations (both healthcare providers and patients alike) in revealing a relationship between the neuropsychiatric symptoms experienced, and the outbreak concerned. There are similarities between these past outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic in that such outbreaks resulted in an ever-increasing sense of foreboding and fear, as well as elevated feelings of anxiety and panic and symptoms associated with post-traumatic stress disorder. What seems to be even more concerning is that there is now evidence to suggest that these adverse cognitive and psychiatric sequelae may have long lasting effects on people at risk [3]. The adverse impact that COVID-19 may have on the eating disorder population is at this stage unknown. However, there are some features that stand out and are deserving of our immediate attention. In the short term, the prevalence of COVID-19 will mean that standard treatment approaches should be re-considered. Should people who are undernourished and with cardio-vascular compromise, be admitted? Although there is some debate as to the medical risks associated with this before COVID-19, do these become more of a concern now? Will the number of admissions decrease during the pandemic? On the other hand, because of the fear of community transmission, would there be a feeling of safety with admission to an eating disorder programme, thus increasing admissions and placing an increased demand on such facilities. The continuation of day hospital programmes for eating disorder patients during the pandemic raises many vexed issues including one of viability during this time. Because of physical distancing and the mantra around the globe of “staying at home” the running of face to face programmes becomes at the least challenging. There is ample evidence of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) group programmes being conducted utilising video conferencing (telehealth) with good clinical efficacy [4]. However, their adaptation to half day and full day programmes have yet to be investigated. The extension of online and alternate methods of delivering care from brief guided self-help CBT ([e.g. [5]) to more comprehensive care is urgently needed. Many of our patients have rigid and inflexible eating behaviours with a very small range of foods that they can eat, and these are often brand related. At a time of food insecurity with bare supermarket shelves, brands may not be available resulting in less choice and increased risk of precipitous weight loss. The increasing news streaming regarding food insecurity may well act as a trigger for those who are ‘hoarders’ of food. Very low weight people with anorexia nervosa may be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 because of emaciation and their compromised physical health, although it isn’t clear that the degree that this applies to those less physically compromised. Studies have suggested that anorexia nervosa may accord a level of resilience to viral illness [6]. It is unclear why, but it could be that there are also non-biological effects, e.g. one explained by the social distancing experienced by people with this eating disorder. Notwithstanding this, if they do contract COVID-19 the effect is likely to be more profound than might be expected than for others of a similarly young age group. Many people with bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder are now at home for 24 hours a  day seven days per week. There is no escape from distancing oneself from food at home and there are limited opportunities to leave home to buy food. Bingeing on the family’s food when restocking is problematic, may lead to further family conflict, heightened emotional arousal, depression and anxiety as well as the likelihood of increased self- harm or even suicidality. Public Health England, a NHS body, and members of the British royal family released a set of guidelines on ‘mental health and well-being aspects of coronavirus’. [7]. Italy has reported suicides amongst medical staff and family members caring for COVID–19 sufferers because they felt responsible for the deaths [8]. Society will expect mental health professionals to address this. As of this month, 10 million Americans had lost their jobs with limited or no income or medical insurance [9]. Episodes of binge eating can be extremely costly and at times of severe fiscal restraint can lead to theft of food and if caught the resultant compounding effects of having to deal with judicial system. A former Australian of the Year and leading Psychiatrist, Professor McGorry, has made a call for the Australian government to urgently establish a national mental health response to address the increased need of the community at large [10]. We would go further and say an international response is needed to a virus which does not think nationally. Both the short-term and long -term consequences of having both an eating disorder and COVID-19 simultaneously are unknown and with time this is likely to become more apparent. It is therefore important that we rapidly develop a repository of comments, protocols, case histories, pertinent literature reviews as well as empirical papers on this topic. To expedite this, the Journal of Eating Disorders is running a special issue on this topic. There are, without doubt, many more important aspects warranting our immediate attention. We hope that this brief editorial will spur you, readers and researchers, into action.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                andreaphillipou@swin.edu.au
                Journal
                Int J Eat Disord
                Int J Eat Disord
                10.1002/(ISSN)1098-108X
                EAT
                The International Journal of Eating Disorders
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0276-3478
                1098-108X
                01 June 2020
                : 10.1002/eat.23317
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre for Mental Health Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 2 ] Department of Mental Health St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 3 ] Department of Mental Health Austin Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 4 ] Department of Psychiatry The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 5 ] Department of Psychiatry Alfred Health Melbourne Victoria Australia
                [ 6 ] Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre The University of Melbourne Victoria Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Dr Andrea Phillipou, Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia.

                Email: andreaphillipou@ 123456swin.edu.au

                [†]

                All these authors contributed equally.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-6619
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9902-0858
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6920-2159
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4812-5630
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4187-1182
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-6665
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7415-8252
                Article
                EAT23317
                10.1002/eat.23317
                7300745
                32476163
                0876f6ac-57f4-4bfd-88f4-088311a857b4
                © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 22 April 2020
                : 14 May 2020
                : 14 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 8, Words: 4691
                Funding
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
                Award ID: GNT1088785
                Award ID: GNT1142424
                Award ID: GNT1154651
                Award ID: GNT1161609
                Award ID: GNT1159953
                Categories
                Brief Report
                Brief Reports
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:18.06.2020

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                anorexia nervosa,australia,coronavirus,covid‐19,eating disorder,national survey,pandemic

                Comments

                Comment on this article