14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A new anisotropic poroelasticity model to describe damage accumulation during cyclic triaxial loading of rock

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          SUMMARY

          Crustal rocks undergo repeated cycles of stress over time. In complex tectonic environments where stresses may evolve both spatially and temporally, such as volcanoes or active fault zones, these rocks may experience not only cyclic loading and unloading, but also rotation and/or reorientation of stresses. In such situations, any resulting crack distributions form sequentially and may therefore be highly anisotropic. Thus, the tectonic history of the crust as recorded in deformed rocks may include evidence for complex stress paths, encompassing different magnitudes and orientations. Despite this, the ways in which variations in principal stresses influence the evolution of anisotropic crack distributions remain poorly constrained. In this work, we build on the previous non-linear anisotropic damage rheology model by presenting a newly developed poroelastic rheological model which accounts for both coupled anisotropic damage and porosity evolution. The new model shares the main features of previously developed anisotropic damage and scalar poroelastic damage models, including the ability to simulate the entire yield curve through a single formulation. In the new model, the yield condition is defined in terms of invariants of the strain tensor, and so the new formulation operates with directional yield conditions (different values for each principal direction) depending on the damage tensor and triaxial loading conditions. This allows us to discern evolving yield conditions for each principal stress direction and fit the measured amounts of accumulated damage from previous loading cycles. Coupling between anisotropic damage and anisotropic compaction along with the damage-dependent yield condition produces a reasonable fit to the experimentally obtained stress–strain curves. Furthermore, the simulated time-dependent cumulative damage is well correlated with experimentally observed acoustic emissions during cyclic loading in different directions. As such, we are able to recreate many of the features of the experimentally observed directional 3-D Kaiser ‘damage memory’ effect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Reciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. I.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Finite Deformations of an Elastic Solid

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Geophysical Journal International
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0956-540X
                1365-246X
                July 2022
                March 24 2022
                July 2022
                March 24 2022
                February 11 2022
                : 230
                : 1
                : 179-201
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Geological Survey of Israel, Jerusalem, 9692100, Israel
                [2 ]Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics UB RAS, Laboratory of Solid Thermomechanics, Perm, 614013, Russia
                [3 ]Department of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering and Department of Mining Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Santiago, 7820436, Chile
                [4 ]Andean Geothermal Centre of Excellence, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 8330015, Chile
                [5 ]Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                [6 ]School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, UK
                Article
                10.1093/gji/ggac062
                083fe06a-14af-4cb6-bdb0-8372ba468b15
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article