5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adapting the European Health Literacy Survey for Fourth-Grade Students in Germany: Questionnaire Development and Qualitative Pretest

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Promoting health literacy in early life is regarded as an important means of sustaining health literacy and health over the life course. However, little evidence is available on children's health literacy, partly due to a scarcity of suitable measurement tools. Although there are 18 tools to measure specific items of health literacy for people younger than age 13 years, there is a lack of comparable, valid, and age-appropriate measures of generic health literacy.

          Objective:

          This study aimed to develop and qualitatively test an age-adapted version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q) for German-speaking children age 9 and 10 years. Although validated for adults and adolescents, the HLS-EU-Q has never been age-adapted or used with children.

          Methods:

          The content and language of HLS-EU-Q items were adapted for this age range. The literature was consulted to inform this process, and adaptations were developed and selected based on consensus among authors. From an item pool of 102 adapted items, 37 were given to 30 fourth-grade students in a cognitive pretest, which is a standard procedure in questionnaire development aiming to explore how items are interpreted. Participants (18 girls, 12 boys) were mostly age 9 or 10 years (range, 9–11 years).

          Key Results:

          Problems with misinterpretation were identified for some items and participants (e.g., items designed to assess participants' perceived difficulty in accessing and appraising health information were partly answered on the basis of knowledge and experience). A final selection of 26 well-performing items corresponded to the underlying HLS-EU-Q framework.

          Conclusions:

          This is the first age-adapted version of the HLS-EU-Q. A preliminary 26-item questionnaire was successfully developed that performed well in a cognitive pretest. However, further research needs to verify its validity and reliability. The present findings help to advance the measurement of generic self-reported health literacy in children and highlight the need for cognitive pretesting as an essential part of questionnaire development . [ HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2020;4(2):e119–e128.]

          Plain Language Summary:

          The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire is used for testing adults' health literacy. It was adapted for German-speaking children age 9 and 10 years. Based on a review of the original items and the literature, 26 questionnaire items were developed and tested in interviews with 30 children. Although problems with understanding could be identified, the questionnaire was mostly well understood.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Measuring health literacy in Asia: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asian countries

          Background Health literacy has been increasingly recognized as one of the most important social determinants for health. However, an appropriate and comprehensive assessment tool is not available in many Asian countries. This study validates a comprehensive health literacy survey tool European health literacy questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) for the general public in several Asian countries. Methods A cross-sectional survey based on multistage random sampling in the target countries. A total of 10,024 participants aged ≥15 years were recruited during 2013–2014 in Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The questionnaire was translated into local languages to measure general health literacy and its three domains. To evaluate the validity of the tool in these countries, data were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency analysis, and regression analysis. Results The questionnaire was shown to have good construct validity, satisfactory goodness-of-fit of the data to the hypothetical model in three health literacy domains, high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha >0.90), satisfactory item-scale convergent validity (item-scale correlation ≥0.40), and no floor/ceiling effects in these countries. General health literacy index score was significantly associated with level of education (P from <0.001 to 0.011) and perceived social status (P from <0.001 to 0.016), with evidence of known-group validity. Conclusions The HLS-EU-Q47 was a satisfactory and comprehensive health literacy survey tool for use in Asia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Shanghai declaration on promoting health in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

            (2017)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review

              Objective Improving health literacy at an early age is crucial to personal health and development. Although health literacy in children and adolescents has gained momentum in the past decade, it remains an under-researched area, particularly health literacy measurement. This study aimed to examine the quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents and to identify the best instrument for field use. Design Systematic review. Setting A wide range of settings including schools, clinics and communities. Participants Children and/or adolescents aged 6–24 years. Primary and secondary outcome measures Measurement properties (reliability, validity and responsiveness) and other important characteristics (eg, health topics, components or scoring systems) of health literacy instruments. Results There were 29 health literacy instruments identified from the screening process. When measuring health literacy in children and adolescents, researchers mainly focus on the functional domain (basic skills in reading and writing) and consider participant characteristics of developmental change (of cognitive ability), dependency (on parents) and demographic patterns (eg, racial/ethnic backgrounds), less on differential epidemiology (of health and illness). The methodological quality of included studies as assessed via measurement properties varied from poor to excellent. More than half (62.9%) of measurement properties were unknown, due to either poor methodological quality of included studies or a lack of reporting or assessment. The 8-item Health Literacy Assessment Tool (HLAT-8) showed best evidence on construct validity, and the Health Literacy Measure for Adolescents showed best evidence on reliability. Conclusions More rigorous and high-quality studies are needed to fill the knowledge gap in measurement properties of health literacy instruments. Although it is challenging to draw a robust conclusion about which instrument is the most reliable and the most valid, this review provides important evidence that supports the use of the HLAT-8 to measure childhood and adolescent health literacy in future school-based research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Lit Res Pract
                Health Lit Res Pract
                HLRP
                HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice
                SLACK Incorporated (Thorofare, NJ )
                2475-6024
                2474-8307
                April 2020
                08 May 2020
                : 4
                : 2
                : e119-e128
                Author notes

                Torsten Michael Bollweg, MA, is a Research Fellow, Centre for Prevention and Intervention in Childhood and Adolescence (CPI), Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University. Orkan Okan, PhD, is a Research Fellow and Project Manager, CPI, Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University. Paulo Pinheiro, MD, is a Senior Researcher, CPI, Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University. Janine Bröder, MSc, is a Research Fellow, CPI, Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University. Dirk Bruland, MSc, PhD, is a Senior Researcher, CPI, Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University. Alexandra Maria Freţian, MSc, is a Research Fellow, CPI, Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University. Olga Maria Domanska, MSc, is a Researcher, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute. Susanne Jordan, Dr PH, is a Senior Researcher and Deputy Head, Division of Health Behavior, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute. Ullrich Bauer, PhD, is a Professor and the Head, Department of Socialisation Research, CPI, Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University.

                Address correspondence to Torsten Michael Bollweg, MA, Centre for Prevention and Intervention in Childhood and Adolescence, Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University, Universitaetsstrasse 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany; email: torsten.bollweg@ 123456uni-bielefeld.de .

                Grant: T.M.B, O.O., J.B., A.M.F., and O.M.D. received grants (01EL1424A and 01EL1424D) from Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) within the frame of the Health Literacy in Childhood and Adolescence research consortium.

                Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

                Article
                10.3928_24748307-20200326-01
                10.3928/24748307-20200326-01
                7213025
                32392350
                07900fd7-642c-4d0c-bd78-bd7c95c15aac
                ©2020 Bollweg, Okan, Pinheiro, et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article non-commercially, provided the author is attributed and the new work is non-commercial.

                History
                : 30 January 2019
                : 23 July 2019
                Categories
                Orginal Research-Qualitative

                Comments

                Comment on this article