6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Complementary Feeding Practices in 80 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Prevalence of and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dietary Diversity, Meal Frequency, and Dietary Adequacy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Adequate complementary feeding practices in early childhood contribute to better food preferences and health outcomes throughout the life course.

          Objectives

          The aim of this study was to describe patterns and socioeconomic inequalities in complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 mo in 80 low- and middle-income countries.

          Methods

          We analyzed national surveys carried out since 2010. Complementary feeding indicators for children aged 6–23 mo included minimum dietary diversity (MDD), minimum meal frequency (MMF), and minimum acceptable diet (MAD). Between- and within-country inequalities were documented using relative (wealth deciles), gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and absolute (estimated household income) socioeconomic indicators. Statistical analyses included calculation of the slope index of inequality, Pearson correlation and linear regression, and scatter diagrams.

          Results

          Only 21.3%, 56.2%, and 10.1% of the 80 countries showed prevalence levels >50% for MDD, MMF, and MAD, respectively. Western & Central Africa showed the lowest prevalence for all indicators, whereas the highest for MDD and MAD was Latin America & Caribbean, and for MMF it was East Asia & the Pacific. Log GDP per capita was positively associated with MDD ( R 2 = 48.5%), MMF (28.2%), and MAD (41.4%). Pro-rich within-country inequalities were observed in most countries for the 3 indicators; pro-poor inequalities were observed in 2 countries for MMF, and in none for the other 2 indicators. Breast milk was the only type of food with a pro-poor distribution, whereas animal-source foods (dairy products, flesh foods, and eggs) showed the most pronounced pro-rich inequality. Dietary diversity improved sharply when absolute annual household incomes exceeded ∼US$20,000. All 3 dietary indicators improved by age and no consistent differences were observed between boys and girls.

          Conclusions

          Monitoring complementary feeding indicators across the world and implementing policies and programs to reduce wealth-related inequalities are essential to achieve optimal child nutrition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries

          The Lancet, 382(9890), 427-451
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.

            The importance of breastfeeding in low-income and middle-income countries is well recognised, but less consensus exists about its importance in high-income countries. In low-income and middle-income countries, only 37% of children younger than 6 months of age are exclusively breastfed. With few exceptions, breastfeeding duration is shorter in high-income countries than in those that are resource-poor. Our meta-analyses indicate protection against child infections and malocclusion, increases in intelligence, and probable reductions in overweight and diabetes. We did not find associations with allergic disorders such as asthma or with blood pressure or cholesterol, and we noted an increase in tooth decay with longer periods of breastfeeding. For nursing women, breastfeeding gave protection against breast cancer and it improved birth spacing, and it might also protect against ovarian cancer and type 2 diabetes. The scaling up of breastfeeding to a near universal level could prevent 823,000 annual deaths in children younger than 5 years and 20,000 annual deaths from breast cancer. Recent epidemiological and biological findings from during the past decade expand on the known benefits of breastfeeding for women and children, whether they are rich or poor.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Nutr
                J Nutr
                jn
                The Journal of Nutrition
                Oxford University Press
                0022-3166
                1541-6100
                July 2021
                13 April 2021
                13 April 2021
                : 151
                : 7
                : 1956-1964
                Affiliations
                International Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas , Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                International Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas , Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                International Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas , Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                International Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas , Pelotas, RS, Brazil
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to GG-D (E-mail: giovagatica@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-2654
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-4725
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-8729
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-2180
                Article
                nxab088
                10.1093/jn/nxab088
                8245881
                33847352
                07854b42-abfd-4b70-8dae-0fa7d576e4d7
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 December 2020
                : 02 February 2021
                : 09 March 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, DOI 10.13039/100000865;
                Award ID: OPP1199234
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust, DOI 10.13039/100010269;
                Award ID: 101815/Z/13/Z
                Funded by: Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva, DOI 10.13039/501100012418;
                Categories
                Nutrient Requirements and Optimal Nutrition
                AcademicSubjects/MED00060
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00960
                Editor's Choice

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                complementary feeding,infant and young child feeding,socioeconomic factors,health equity,child nutrition

                Comments

                Comment on this article