148
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    8
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative Study of Hand-Sutured versus Circular Stapled Anastomosis for Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopy Assisted Distal Gastrectomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Mechanical stapler is regarded as a good alternative to the hand sewing technique, when used in gastric reconstruction. The circular stapling method has been widely applied to gastrectomy (open orlaparoscopic), for gastric cancer. We illustrated and compared the hand-sutured method to the circular stapling method, for Billroth-II, in patients who underwent laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

          Materials and Methods

          Between April 2009 and May 2011, 60 patients who underwent laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy, with Billroth-II, were enrolled. Hand-sutured Billroth-II was performed in 40 patients (manual group) and circular stapler Billroth-II was performed in 20 patients (stapler group). Clinicopathological features and post-operative outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

          Results

          Nosignificant differences were observed in clinicopathologic parameters and post-operative outcomes, except in the operation times. Operation times and anastomosis times were significantly shorter in the stapler group (P=0.004 and P<0.001).

          Conclusions

          Compared to the hand-sutured method, the circular stapling method can be applied safely and more efficiently, when performing Billroth-II anastomosis, after laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Disparities in gastric cancer chemotherapy between the East and West.

          There are still remarkable disparities in the treatment of gastric cancer between the East and West. Treatment outcomes for this disease have improved in Japan due to early detection and surgical resection with systematic node dissections, such as D2, whereas gastric cancer remains a virulent disease in Western countries. Differences in the types of surgery and their outcomes affect how adjuvant trials are conducted and interpreted. Recent Western randomized trials demonstrated the significant survival benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or intensive combination chemotherapy. However, baseline surgical quality and outcomes were quite different from those in Japan, and Japanese surgical/medical oncologists have not accepted the Western results. Several disparities are also evident in the results of chemotherapy trials for advanced gastric cancer. Although similar results were obtained with randomized studies using older regimens, the interpretation of the results differed between Japan and other countries. A combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil was used as the reference arm in ongoing randomized trials in most countries, whereas single-agent fluorouracil or S-1 alone was used in Japanese trials. Two triplet regimens have already demonstrated significant prolongation of survival in Western studies. However, these benefits seem to be marginal and these regimens may be replaced by newer regimens, which will soon be available in Europe and Asia, where a total of 2,600 patients have been accrued. Although these disparities between regions must be overcome, it is time for both Eastern and Western investigators to pursue further benefits by incorporating new agents into treatment regimens.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.

            Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is considered technically more complicated than the open method. Moreover, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with extraperigastric lymph node dissection in patients with gastric cancer have not been established yet. To evaluate short-term surgical validity, surgical outcome of the laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with extraperigastric lymph node dissection was compared with that of the conventional open distal gastrectomy (CODG) in patients with early gastric cancer. One hundred and forty-seven patients with early gastric cancer received radical distal gastrectomy during 2002 and 2003, where LADG was undergone in 71 patients. The clinicopathologic characteristics, postoperative outcomes and courses, and postoperative morbidities and mortalities were compared between the two groups. Data were retrieved from the stomach cancer database at Dong-A University Medical center. Baseline characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, tumor size, T stage, and lymph node metastasis were similar between the two groups. No significant differences were found between these groups in terms of the number of retrieved lymph nodes with respect to D1 + alpha (D1 + no. 7) and D1 + beta (D1 + no. 7, 8a, and 9) lymphadenectomy. In the LADG group, wound size was smaller (P < 0.0001), but operation time was longer (P = 0.0001) than in the CODG group. Perioperative recovery was faster in the LADG group than in the CODG group, as reflected by a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.0176) and less times of additional analgesics (P = 0.0370). Serum albumin level in LADG was higher (P = 0.0002) on day 7 than that in CODG, and the leukocyte count in LADG lower (P = 0.0445) on day 1 than that in CODG. Postoperative morbidities and mortalities were not significantly different between the two groups. Our data confirmed that LADG with extraperigastric (no. 7, 8, and 9) lymph node dissection proved to be feasible and acceptable surgical technique for early gastric cancer. At least taking a surgical point of view, LADG with extraperigastric lymph node dissection is suggested to be a preferred surgical option for patients with early gastric cancer. Its oncologic validity awaits larger and prospective multicenter trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract.

              A stapling instrument is described for end-to-end inverting anastomoses applicable principally to low rectal anastomosis or esophagogastric or esophagojejunal anastomosis. The instrument creates an inverting anastomosis held by a double staggered row of stainless steel wire staples creating an anastomosis 21.2 mm internal diameter with no significant inverted flange. The early experience is encouraging.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Gastric Cancer
                J Gastric Cancer
                JGC
                Journal of Gastric Cancer
                The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
                2093-582X
                2093-5641
                June 2012
                27 June 2012
                : 12
                : 2
                : 120-125
                Affiliations
                Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Ki Han Kim. Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 26, Dongdaesin-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 602-715, Korea. Tel: +82-51-240-5146, Fax: +82-51-247-9316, sshamee@ 123456dau.ac.kr
                Article
                10.5230/jgc.2012.12.2.120
                3392323
                22792525
                063aad36-a8d1-41b7-84b9-dc623bd62811
                Copyright © 2012 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 January 2012
                : 12 March 2012
                : 20 March 2012
                Categories
                Original Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                gastric cancer,billroth-ii,laparoscopy,staple
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                gastric cancer, billroth-ii, laparoscopy, staple

                Comments

                Comment on this article