17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sovereignty, privacy, and ethics in blockchain-based identity management systems

      research-article
      Ethics and Information Technology
      Springer Netherlands
      Identity management, SSI, Sovereignty, Privacy, Blockchain

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Self-sovereign identity (SSI) solutions implemented on the basis of blockchain technology are seen as alternatives to existing digital identification systems, or even as a foundation of standards for the new global infrastructures for identity management systems. It is argued that ‘self-sovereignty' in this context can be understood as the concept of individual control over identity relevant private data, capacity to choose where such data is stored, and the ability to provide it to those who need to validate it. It is also argued that while it might be appealing to operationalise the concept of ‘self-sovereignty’ in a narrow technical sense, depreciation of moral semantics obscures key challenges and long-term repercussions. Closer attention to the normative substance of the ‘sovereignty’ concept helps to highlight a range of ethical issues pertaining to the changing nature of human identity in the context of ubiquitous private data collection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.

          Judging others' personalities is an essential skill in successful social living, as personality is a key driver behind people's interactions, behaviors, and emotions. Although accurate personality judgments stem from social-cognitive skills, developments in machine learning show that computer models can also make valid judgments. This study compares the accuracy of human and computer-based personality judgments, using a sample of 86,220 volunteers who completed a 100-item personality questionnaire. We show that (i) computer predictions based on a generic digital footprint (Facebook Likes) are more accurate (r = 0.56) than those made by the participants' Facebook friends using a personality questionnaire (r = 0.49); (ii) computer models show higher interjudge agreement; and (iii) computer personality judgments have higher external validity when predicting life outcomes such as substance use, political attitudes, and physical health; for some outcomes, they even outperform the self-rated personality scores. Computers outpacing humans in personality judgment presents significant opportunities and challenges in the areas of psychological assessment, marketing, and privacy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Security without identification: transaction systems to make big brother obsolete

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                g.ishmaev@protonmail.com , g.ishmaev@tudelft.nl
                Journal
                Ethics Inf Technol
                Ethics Inf Technol
                Ethics and Information Technology
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                1388-1957
                1572-8439
                30 November 2020
                30 November 2020
                : 1-14
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.5292.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2097 4740, Technical University of Delft, ; Van Mourik Broekmanweg, 2628 XE Delft, The Netherlands
                Article
                9563
                10.1007/s10676-020-09563-x
                7701220
                0482857e-d191-4635-9828-9698c1202e20
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Delft University of Technology
                Categories
                Original Paper

                identity management,ssi,sovereignty,privacy,blockchain
                identity management, ssi, sovereignty, privacy, blockchain

                Comments

                Comment on this article