8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of experimental resin cements containing thio-urethane oligomers on the durability of ceramic-composite bonded interfaces

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Thio-urethane oligomers improve conversion and mechanical properties of resin cements. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of resin cements formulated with thio-urethane (TU) oligomers on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of ceramics to composites subjected to thermal/mechanical cycling.

          Methods: BisGMA/UDMA/TEGDMA (50/30/20 wt%) containg 0 (control, EC) or 20 wt% aliphatic or aromatic thiourethane (HDDI and BDI, respectively) were mixed with CQ/amine (0.2/0.8 wt%) and 25 wt% 0.7um Ba glass. Rely X Ultimate (RU-3M ESPE) was used as the commercial control. The cements were sandwiched between ceramic (IPS e.max Press) and resin composite blocks (Filtek Supreme, 3 M-ESPE). Eight bonded blocks were produced per experimental group. Prior to bonding, ceramic surfaces were etched (20 s – 10% HF) and silanized. Composite surfaces were treated with Single Bond Universal (3 M ESPE). Specimens were stored for 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C, and then either tested immediately, or subjected to thermal (10,000, 5 °C and 55 °C) or mechanical cycling (300,000 cycles). Sticks (1 mm 2, average of 25 sticks per block) were cut and tested for µTBS (1.0 mm/min). Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test ( α = 5%). Fracture surfaces were analyzed to determine failure modes.

          Results: The µTBS for HDDI and RU was significantly higher than BDI and EC cements. BDI led to significantly higher µTBS than EC after 24 h, Tc and Mf. µTBS decreased significantly after thermal/mechanical cycling for all groups. Failure modes were predominantly adhesive or mixed.

          Significance: The use of selected thio-urethane oligomers was able to increase the µTBS of composite-cement-ceramic specimens. Tc and Mf reduced µTBS for all resins cements.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Thiol-enes: Chemistry of the past with promise for the future

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations.

            Exposure of restorations in extracted teeth to cyclic thermal fluctuations to simulate one of the many factors in the oral environment has been common in many tracer penetration, marginal gap and bond strength laboratory tests. Temperature changes used have rarely been substantiated with temperature measurements made in vivo and vary considerably between reports. Justification and standardization of regimen are required. An assessment of reports describing temperature changes of teeth in vivo is followed by an analysis of 130 studies of laboratory thermal cycling of teeth by 99 first authors selected from 25 journals. A clinically relevant thermal cycling regimen was derived from the in vivo information, and is suggested as a benchmark standard. Variation of regimens used was large, making comparison of reports difficult. Reports of testing the effects of thermal cycling were often contradictory, but generally leakage increased with thermal stress, although it has never been demonstrated that cyclic testing is relevant to clinical failures. However, should this be done, the standard cyclic regimen defined is: 35 degrees C (28 s), 15 degrees C (2 s), 35 degrees C (28 s), 45 degrees C (2 s). No evidence of the number of cycles likely to be experienced in vivo was found and this requires investigation, but a provisional estimate of approximately 10,000 cycles per year is suggested. Thermal stressing of restoration interfaces is only of value when the initial bond is already known to be reliable. This is not the case for most current restorative materials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Elution of leachable components from composites.

              A significant amount of residual monomer or short chain polymers remain unbound in set composite material. Due to its potential impact on both the biocompatibility and the structural stability of the restoration, many investigators have studied the elution of these unbound molecules into aqueous media. The results of these studies suggest that elution of leachable components from composites is rapid, with the majority being released within a matter of hours. Weight losses of up to 2% of the mass of the composite have been reported under certain conditions. The studies have also shown that the extent and rate of elution of components from composites is dependent upon several factors. The quantity of leachables has been correlated to the degree of cure of the polymer network. The composition and solubility characteristics of the extraction solvent influence the kinetics and mechanism of the elution process. Elution is generally thought to occur via diffusion of molecules through the resin matrix, and is therefore dependent upon the size and chemical characteristics of the leachable species.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biomater Investig Dent
                Biomater Investig Dent
                IABO
                iabo21
                Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry
                Taylor & Francis
                2641-5275
                2019
                27 November 2019
                : 6
                : 1
                : 81-89
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Dental Materials, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, State University of Campinas , Campinas, Brazil;
                [b ]School of Dentistry, Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon;
                [c ]School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Ingá University Center , Prostothontics, Brazil
                Author notes
                CONTACT Carmem S. Pfeifer pfeiferc@ 123456ohsu.edu School of Dentistry, Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Health and Science University , 2730 SW Moody Ave., 6N036, Portland, OR97201, USA
                Article
                1693274
                10.1080/26415275.2019.1693274
                6964779
                03c0f0f7-fc3b-4aa9-a38e-6f58e9412a2b
                © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 August 2019
                : 29 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Pages: 9, Words: 6491
                Funding
                Funded by: FAPESP - São Paulo Research Foundation 10.13039/501100001807
                Award ID: 2016/03576-9
                Award ID: U01 DE023756
                Award ID: R15 DE023211
                Award ID: K02 DE025280
                This study was supported by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial research (grant numbers K02-DE025280; U01-DE023756; R15-DE023211) and FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado de São Paulo, grant number 2016/03576-9).
                Categories
                Original Article

                resin cement,thio-urethane oligomers,ceramic,thermocycling,load-cycling,bond strength

                Comments

                Comment on this article