Rights based approaches to sexual and reproductive health in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Abstract

Introduction

The Sustainable Development Goals, which are grounded in human rights, involve empowering women and girls and ensuring that everyone can access sexual and reproductive health and rights (Goal 5). This is the first systematic review reporting interventions involving rights-based approaches for sexual and reproductive health issues including gender-based violence, maternity, HIV and sexually transmitted infections in low and middle-income countries.

Aims

To describe the evidence on rights-based approaches to sexual and reproductive health in low and middle-income countries.

Methods

EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched until 9/1/2020. Inclusion criteria were:

• Study design: any interventional study.

• Population: females aged over 15 living in low and middle-income countries.

• Intervention: a “rights-based approach” (defined by the author) and/or interventions that the author explicitly stated related to "rights".

• Comparator: clusters in which no intervention or fewer components of an intervention were in place, or individuals not exposed to interventions, or exposed to fewer intervention components.

• Outcome: Sexual and reproductive health related outcomes.

A narrative synthesis of included studies was undertaken, and outcomes mapped to identify evidence gaps.

The systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019158950).

Results

Database searching identified 17,212 records, and 13,404 studies remained after de-duplication. Twenty-four studies were included after title and abstract, full-text and reference-list screening by two authors independently.

Rights-based interventions were effective for some included outcomes, but evidence was of poor quality. Testing uptake for HIV and/or other sexually transmitted infections, condom use, and awareness of rights improved with intervention, but all relevant studies were at high, critical or serious risk of bias. No study included gender-based violence outcomes.

Conclusion

Considerable risk of bias in all studies means results must be interpreted with caution. High-quality controlled studies are needed urgently in this area.