21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of Maintenance Therapy for the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          At the present time, peri-implantitis has become a global burden that occurs with a frequency from 1% to 47% at implant level. Therefore, we aimed herein at assessing the impact of peri-implant maintenance therapy (PIMT) on the prevention of peri-implant diseases. Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted by 3 independent reviewers using several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to June 2015 without language restriction. Articles were included if they were clinical trials aimed at demonstrating the incidence of peri-implant diseases under a strict regime or not of PIMT. Implant survival and failure rate were studied as secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of PIMT and other reported variables upon peri-implant diseases. Thirteen and 10 clinical trials were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis, respectively. Mucositis was affected by history of periodontitis and mean PIMT at implant and patient levels, respectively. Similarly, significant effects of history of periodontal disease were obtained for peri-implantitis for both implant and patient levels. Furthermore, mean PIMT interval was demonstrated to influence the incidence of peri-implantitis at implant but not patient level. PIMT interval showed significance at both levels. For implant survival, implants under PIMT have 0.958 the incident event than those with no PIMT. Within the limitations of the present systematic review, it can be concluded that implant therapy must not be limited to the placement and restoration of dental implants but to the implementation of PIMT to potentially prevent biologic complications and hence to heighten the long-term success rate. Although it must be tailored to a patient's risk profiling, our findings suggest reason to claim a minimum recall PIMT interval of 5 to 6 mo. Additionally, it must be stressed that even in the establishment of PIMT, biologic complications might occur. Thus, patient-, clinical-, and implant-related factors must be thoroughly explored.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Dent. Res.
          Journal of dental research
          1544-0591
          0022-0345
          Apr 2016
          : 95
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA amonjec@umich.edu.
          [2 ] Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Cayetano Heredia Peruvian University, Lima, Perú
          [3 ] Department of Oral Implantology, Cayetano Heredia Peruvian University, Lima, Perú
          [4 ] Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
          [5 ] Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
          Article
          0022034515622432
          10.1177/0022034515622432
          26701350
          0099f1fa-a141-4fb2-9e56-003f183cd553
          © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.
          History

          dental implants,evidence-based dentistry,mucositis,peri-implantitis,periodontitis,risk factors

          Comments

          Comment on this article