6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Disruption of the anaphase-promoting complex confers resistance to TTK inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          TTK protein kinase (TTK), also known as Monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1), is a key regulator of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which functions to maintain genomic integrity. TTK has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in human cancers, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Several TTK inhibitors (TTKis) are being evaluated in clinical trials, and an understanding of the mechanisms mediating TTKi sensitivity and resistance could inform the successful development of this class of agents. We evaluated the cellular effects of the potent clinical TTKi CFI-402257 in TNBC models. CFI-402257 induced apoptosis and potentiated aneuploidy in TNBC lines by accelerating progression through mitosis and inducing mitotic segregation errors. We used genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screens in multiple TNBC cell lines to identify mechanisms of resistance to CFI-402257. Our functional genomic screens identified members of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) complex, which promotes mitotic progression following inactivation of the SAC. Several screen candidates were validated to confer resistance to CFI-402257 and other TTKis using CRISPR/Cas9 and siRNA methods. These findings extend the observation that impairment of the APC/C enables cells to tolerate genomic instability caused by SAC inactivation, and support the notion that a measure of APC/C function could predict the response to TTK inhibition. Indeed, an APC/C gene expression signature is significantly associated with CFI-402257 response in breast and lung adenocarcinoma cell line panels. This expression signature, along with somatic alterations in genes involved in mitotic progression, represent potential biomarkers that could be evaluated in ongoing clinical trials of CFI-402257 or other TTKis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Molecular Biology of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling Dynamics.

          The spindle assembly checkpoint is a safeguard mechanism that coordinates cell-cycle progression during mitosis with the state of chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle. The checkpoint prevents mitotic cells from exiting mitosis in the presence of unattached or improperly attached chromosomes, thus avoiding whole-chromosome gains or losses and their detrimental effects on cell physiology. Here, I review a considerable body of recent progress in the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying checkpoint signaling, and identify a number of unresolved questions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Targeting Mitosis in Cancer: Emerging Strategies.

            The cell cycle is an evolutionarily conserved process necessary for mammalian cell growth and development. Because cell-cycle aberrations are a hallmark of cancer, this process has been the target of anti-cancer therapeutics for decades. However, despite numerous clinical trials, cell-cycle-targeting agents have generally failed in the clinic. This review briefly examines past cell-cycle-targeted therapeutics and outlines how experience with these agents has provided valuable insight to refine and improve anti-mitotic strategies. An overview of emerging anti-mitotic approaches with promising pre-clinical results is provided, and the concept of exploiting the genomic instability of tumor cells through therapeutic inhibition of mitotic checkpoints is discussed. We believe this strategy has a high likelihood of success given its potential to enhance therapeutic index by targeting tumor-specific vulnerabilities. This reasoning stimulated our development of novel inhibitors targeting the critical regulators of genomic stability and the mitotic checkpoint: AURKA, PLK4, and Mps1/TTK.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional Genomic Landscape of Human Breast Cancer Drivers, Vulnerabilities, and Resistance.

              Large-scale genomic studies have identified multiple somatic aberrations in breast cancer, including copy number alterations and point mutations. Still, identifying causal variants and emergent vulnerabilities that arise as a consequence of genetic alterations remain major challenges. We performed whole-genome small hairpin RNA (shRNA) "dropout screens" on 77 breast cancer cell lines. Using a hierarchical linear regression algorithm to score our screen results and integrate them with accompanying detailed genetic and proteomic information, we identify vulnerabilities in breast cancer, including candidate "drivers," and reveal general functional genomic properties of cancer cells. Comparisons of gene essentiality with drug sensitivity data suggest potential resistance mechanisms, effects of existing anti-cancer drugs, and opportunities for combination therapy. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of this large dataset by identifying BRD4 as a potential target in luminal breast cancer and PIK3CA mutations as a resistance determinant for BET-inhibitors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                February 13 2018
                February 13 2018
                February 13 2018
                January 29 2018
                : 115
                : 7
                : E1570-E1577
                Article
                10.1073/pnas.1719577115
                65e9d916-328d-4b75-858b-0138f5b67931
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article