10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sources of Foods That Are Ready-to-Consume ('Grazing Environments') Versus Requiring Additional Preparation ('Grocery Environments'): Implications for Food-Environment Research and Community Health.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Local businesses that offer foods may create different 'grazing environments' (characterized by sources of ready-to-consume foods) and 'grocery environments' (characterized by source of foods for later preparation). Such environments may be relevant to different populations at different times and may vary by neighborhood. In neighborhoods within two demographically distinct areas of the Bronx, NY [Area A (higher-poverty, greater minority representation, lesser vehicle ownership) vs. Area B], researchers assessed all storefront businesses for food offerings. Food offerings could be ready-to-consume or require additional preparation. 'Healthful' offerings included fruits and vegetables, whole grains, and nuts; 'less-healthful' offerings included 'refined sweets' and 'salty/fatty fare.' 'Food businesses' (those primarily focused on selling food) were distinguished from 'other businesses' (not focused primarily on food selling). Area A had a higher percentage of street segments on which foods were available (28.6% vs. 6.9% in Area B; difference 21.7% points [95% CI 17.0, 26.5]) and a higher percentage of businesses offering foods (46.9% vs. 41.7% in Area B; difference 5.2% points [95% CI - 2.0, 12.4]). 'Less-healthful' items predominated in both 'grazing environments' and overall environments ('grazing' plus 'grocery environments'; the environments researchers typically measure) in both Areas A and B. 'Other businesses' represented about 2/3 of all businesses and accounted for nearly 1/3 of all the businesses offering food in both geographic areas. The lower-income area with greater minority representation and less private transportation had more businesses offering foods on more streets. There was near-perfect overlap between 'grazing environments' and overall environments in both geographic areas. Future research should consider the extent of 'grazing' and 'grocery environments,' and when each might be most relevant to populations of interest.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Community Health
          Journal of community health
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1573-3610
          0094-5145
          October 2018
          : 43
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine | Montefiore Health System, Bronx, NY, USA. slucan@yahoo.com.
          [2 ] Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine | Montefiore Health System, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Block Building, Room 410, Bronx, NY, 10461-1900, USA. slucan@yahoo.com.
          [3 ] Department of Environmental, Occupational, and Geospatial Health Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA.
          [4 ] Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
          [5 ] Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
          Article
          10.1007/s10900-018-0498-9 NIHMS948309
          10.1007/s10900-018-0498-9
          6119498
          29541958
          8156072b-626e-47fc-a1cd-68b104ed3140
          History

          Public health,Whole grains,Vegetables,Research,Processed foods,Nuts,Fruits,Food environment,Diet,Community nutrition

          Comments

          Comment on this article