53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: Impacts and policy options.

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We review and synthesize information on invasions of nonnative forest insects and diseases in the United States, including their ecological and economic impacts, pathways of arrival, distribution within the United States, and policy options for reducing future invasions. Nonnative insects have accumulated in United States forests at a rate of ~2.5 per yr over the last 150 yr. Currently the two major pathways of introduction are importation of live plants and wood packing material such as pallets and crates. Introduced insects and diseases occur in forests and cities throughout the United States, and the problem is particularly severe in the Northeast and Upper Midwest. Nonnative forest pests are the only disturbance agent that has effectively eliminated entire tree species or genera from United States forests within decades. The resulting shift in forest structure and species composition alters ecosystem functions such as productivity, nutrient cycling, and wildlife habitat. In urban and suburban areas, loss of trees from streets, yards, and parks affects aesthetics, property values, shading, stormwater runoff, and human health. The economic damage from nonnative pests is not yet fully known, but is likely in the billions of dollars per year, with the majority of this economic burden borne by municipalities and residential property owners. Current policies for preventing introductions are having positive effects but are insufficient to reduce the influx of pests in the face of burgeoning global trade. Options are available to strengthen the defenses against pest arrival and establishment, including measures taken in the exporting country prior to shipment, measures to ensure clean shipments of plants and wood products, inspections at ports of entry, and post-entry measures such as quarantines, surveillance, and eradication programs. Improved data collection procedures for inspections, greater data accessibility, and better reporting would support better evaluation of policy effectiveness. Lack of additional action places the nation, local municipalities, and property owners at high risk of further damaging and costly invasions. Adopting stronger policies to reduce establishments of new forest insects and diseases would shift the major costs of control to the source and alleviate the economic burden now borne by homeowners and municipalities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species.

            Invasions of nonindigenous species threaten native biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, animal and plant health, and human economies. The best solution is to prevent the introduction of exotic organisms but, once introduced, eradication might be feasible. The potential ecological and social ramifications of eradication projects make them controversial; however, these programs provide unique opportunities for experimental ecological studies. Deciding whether to attempt eradication is not simple and alternative approaches might be preferable in some situations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Emerald Ash Borer Invasion of North America: History, Biology, Ecology, Impacts, and Management

              Since its accidental introduction from Asia, emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), has killed millions of ash trees in North America. As it continues to spread, it could functionally extirpate ash with devastating economic and ecological impacts. Little was known about EAB when it was first discovered in North America in 2002, but substantial advances in understanding of EAB biology, ecology, and management have occurred since. Ash species indigenous to China are generally resistant to EAB and may eventually provide resistance genes for introgression into North American species. EAB is characterized by stratified dispersal resulting from natural and human-assisted spread, and substantial effort has been devoted to the development of survey methods. Early eradication efforts were abandoned largely because of the difficulty of detecting and delineating infestations. Current management is focused on biological control, insecticide protection of high-value trees, and integrated efforts to slow ash mortality.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecol Appl
                Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
                Wiley-Blackwell
                1051-0761
                1051-0761
                Jul 2016
                : 26
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, New York, 12545, USA.
                [2 ] Science Policy Exchange, Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts, 01366, USA.
                [3 ] Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts, 01366, USA.
                [4 ] USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505, USA.
                [5 ] USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27701, USA.
                [6 ] Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1, Canada.
                [7 ] Center for Invasive Species Prevention, Bethesda, MD 20814 , USA.
                [8 ] Ecological Research Institute, Kingston, New York, 12401, USA.
                [9 ] Department of Entomology and Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, USA.
                [10 ] Department of Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755, USA.
                [11 ] The Nature Conservancy, New York State Chapter, Albany, New York, 12205, USA.
                Article
                10.1890/15-1176
                27755760
                b55c93bc-cda3-4fac-88b8-54c8448cabbe
                History

                disease,forest,insect,invasive,pathogen,policy
                disease, forest, insect, invasive, pathogen, policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article