Average rating: | Rated 4.5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | I work for the platform ScienceOpen hosting this journal. |
This commentary raises the important issue of how we can shape the societal response to the climate change crisis through education and in particular teacher training programs. The Covid-19 pandemic taught us that technical solutions such as viable vaccines must be supported by society to be effective and must therefore go hand in hand with outreach and education programs. The time-scale of the climate crisis is longer, which gives an opportunity to address it through the educational infrastructure in place for children and young people, but the data shared in this work suggests that much more must be done. I was convinced by the strategy of creating training materials for teachers to provide a more unified presentation of challenges and solutions across a range of disciplines with the goal of effecting societal change to address climate change. While this should not be the only educational intervention, it is a start.
I would appreciate more information about the data-set of the study done by Greer, Sheldrake, et al., The ‘web of conditions’ governing England’s climate change education policy landscape. Journal of Education Policy, 38(1), 69–92, as this forms the central argument of the commentary and rationale for investing in teacher training materials across the entire curriculum.