Average rating: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Competing interests: | The reviewer is specialised in disaster public health, so there might be acadmic competing interests. |
This is an important paper to show that reliefe activitis may have a beneficial effect on mental status of people affected by a disaster.
Even so, it might be better the author revise the following points.
2. Methods
a It is not clear how the Tobit latent anxiety seviry is used for the study. Did the author re-calculate the level of anxiety among the participants? If so, please describe the modified anxiety levels in Table 2. Or if the score was used for regression analyses, please describe it.
b Please describe the definition of binge drinking.
c Please include the method of imputation used in Table 1 in the Method section.
d Please describe Wald test used in Table 3 and 4 in the Method section.
3. Results
a Table1. What are the numbers in bracket means.
b Please include average of anxiety score in each group so that the reader can see the trend.
c Table 3 and 4 are not consistent with main manuscript. In manuscript the author use 'beta' as outcome, but the tables show 'difference in anxiety'. Also there is no explanation about what the difference in anxiety means e.g. what score was subtracted by what.
4. Discussion
a Although the author discusse the novelty of the article in 4.2, it is not clear how the article is different from the research of Reference 10.
b As the authors discussed, previous studies sometimes show negative impact of volunteering on mental health. Please add discission about the reason why this discrepancy occurs e.g. differnce in disaster type, characteristics of the residents, etc.