Average rating: | Rated 4.5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
Thank you very much for addressing the comments I have provided. The quality of work has really improved and is now more clear and comprehensive. The additions to literature review and clarification of aims has really helped the understanding of importance of this framework and gives a clearer idea of what will be addressed.
I just noticed a couple of minor typos:
1. p 8, first paragraph, last sentence. The comma after "and" should probably be before "and".
2. p 13, under "case study description", the following sentence seems to have a mistake: "Since previous efforts to eradicate single-use coffee cups across the campus had been of limited effectiveness, the university aims to develop of an intervention informed by behavioural science".
Good luck with the implementation of this project!